Skip to content

ci: convert distcheck to free runner #141382

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2025

Conversation

marcoieni
Copy link
Member

@marcoieni marcoieni commented May 22, 2025

Move to free runner to make CI more efficient.
r? @ghost

try-job: x86_64-gnu-distcheck

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 22, 2025
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented May 22, 2025

FWIW, 2h 35m is not so terrible and I wouldn't mind landing that, we definitely have slower runners now.

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

mmm yes, but what's the con of having a faster job? 🚀

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented May 22, 2025

x64 is still way more popular than aarch64, so having distcheck coverage for that seems a bit more important. But I don't mind that much, just wanted to see if a free runner is also a viable alternative here.

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

I see. Makes sense. I have almost no preference. Let's see how the try job goes.
@bors try

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2025
ci: convert distcheck to free runner

try-job: x86_64-gnu-distcheck
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 22, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 27677ef with merge 29e0b66...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 22, 2025

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 29e0b66 (29e0b6670513bc6e6d566de6eadb62eb1df794ce)

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented May 22, 2025

2h 24m. I would just land it like this, to keep the original behavior.

@marcoieni marcoieni marked this pull request as ready for review May 22, 2025 10:52
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 22, 2025
@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

makes sense. If it becomes too slow in the future, we can always switch to the arm runner.

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented May 22, 2025

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 22, 2025

📌 Commit 27677ef has been approved by Kobzol

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 22, 2025
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#141355 (ci: improve citool job db errors)
 - rust-lang#141359 (Fix `FnOnce` impl for `AsyncFn`/`AsyncFnMut` self-borrowing closures in new solver)
 - rust-lang#141362 (Normalize aliases to correct kind of error term)
 - rust-lang#141377 (Remove unnecessary `is_empty` checks)
 - rust-lang#141381 (try_cast_aligned: avoid bare int-to-ptr casts)
 - rust-lang#141382 (ci: convert distcheck to free runner)
 - rust-lang#141389 (ci: prepare aws access keys for migration)
 - rust-lang#141390 (Don't allow `poly_select` in new solver)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 9507b10 into rust-lang:master May 22, 2025
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone May 22, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#141382 - marcoieni:distcheck-free-x86, r=Kobzol

ci: convert distcheck to free runner

try-job: x86_64-gnu-distcheck
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants