drop use of obsolete _1 symbols #13
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The symbols have always been used through implicit includes from ros_comm, but ROS-O considers changing these includes right now because of excessive deprecation warnings building all of ROS. ros-o/ros_comm#3
Contributor
|
I compiled this on Noetic/20.04 and it didn't cause any problems. I don't have a melodic container around for testing, so to be safe i made a new branch |
Contributor
Author
|
Sure, thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The symbols have always been used through implicit includes from ros_comm, but ROS-O considers changing these includes right now because of excessive deprecation warnings building all of ROS.
ros-o/ros_comm#3
@jonbinney One more for the collection :-)