Clarify inclusivity of search.from and search.to
#4873
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kazarmy
requested review from
wargio,
thestr4ng3r,
ret2libc and
Rot127
as code owners
wargio
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2025
Rot127
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Your checklist for this pull request
RZ_APIfunction and struct this PR changes.RZ_API).ell searchbook#136Detailed description
As a continuation of #4871, this pr clarifies the inclusivity of the
search.fromandsearch.toconfig variables.Test plan
The clarification is reasonable. All builds are green.
Closing issues
...