-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DFBUGS-840: Propagate VR conditions .Message #394
base: release-4.17
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@nirs: This pull request references RHSTOR-6642 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "odf-4.18" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@nirs: This pull request references RHSTOR-6642 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "odf-4.17" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@nirs: This pull request references RHSTOR-6642 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "odf-4.17" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Need to replace the RHSTOR issue with DFBUGS item. |
@nirs: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-840](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-840), which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@nirs: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-840](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-840), which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@nirs: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-840](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-840), which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@nirs: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-840](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-840), which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@nirs: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-840](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-840), which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (kramdoss@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
When a VR condition is not met, we set the protected PVC condition message using the error message returned from isVRConditionMet(). When using csi-addons > 0.10.0, we use now the message from the condition instead of the default message. Since the Validated condition is not reported by older version of csi-addons, and we must wait until the Validated condition status is known when VRG is deleted, isVRConditionMet() returns now also the state of the condition, which can be: - missing: condition not found - stale: observed generation does not match object generation - unknown: the special "Unknown" value - known: status is True or False When we validate the Validate condition we have these cases: - Condition is missing: continue to next condition. - Condition is met: continue to the next condition. - Condition not met and its status is False. This VR will never complete and it is safe to delete since replication will never start. If VRG is deleted, we return true since the VR reached the designed state. Otherwise we return false. In this case we updated the protected pvc condition with the message from the VR condition. - Condition is not met and is stale or unnown: we need to check again later. There is no point to check the completed condition since a VR cannot complete without validation.In this case we updated the protected pvc condition with the message generated by isVRConditionMet() for stale or unknown conditions. Example protected pvc DataReady condition with propagated message when VR validation failed: conditions: - lastTransitionTime: "2024-11-06T15:33:06Z" message: 'failed to meet prerequisite: rpc error: code = FailedPrecondition desc = system is not in a state required for the operation''s execution: failed to enable mirroring on image "replicapool/csi-vol-fe2ca7f8-713c-4c51-bf52-0d4b2c11d329": parent image "replicapool/csi-snap-e2114105-b451-469b-ad97-eb3cbe2af54e" is not enabled for mirroring' observedGeneration: 1 reason: Error status: "False" type: DataReady Signed-off-by: Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 795fea2)
8054e2e
to
6993ca6
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: nirs The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@ShyamsundarR @raghavendra-talur change should be ready for merge. |
When a VR condition is not met, we set the protected PVC condition
message using the error message returned from isVRConditionMet(). When
using csi-addons > 0.10.0, we use now the message from the condition
instead of the default message.
Since the Validated condition is not reported by older version of
csi-addons, and we must wait until the Validated condition status is
known when VRG is deleted, isVRConditionMet() returns now also the state
of the condition, which can be:
When we validate the Validate condition we have these cases:
Condition is missing: continue to next condition.
Condition is met: continue to the next condition.
Condition not met and its status is False. This VR will never
complete and it is safe to delete since replication will never start.
If VRG is deleted, we return true since the VR reached the designed
state. Otherwise we return false. In this case we updated the
protected pvc condition with the message from the VR condition.
Condition is not met and is stale or unnown: we need to check again
later. There is no point to check the completed condition since a VR
cannot complete without validation.In this case we updated the
protected pvc condition with the message generated by
isVRConditionMet() for stale or unknown conditions.
Example protected pvc DataReady condition with propagated message when
VR validation failed:
Backport notes:
JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DFBUGS-840