Skip to content

Multithreading refactor for ObjectManager. #1911

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Apr 16, 2018

Conversation

elibol
Copy link
Contributor

@elibol elibol commented Apr 16, 2018

This PR refactors the ObjectManager to send/receive messages and create connections on the main thread. It also removes the ObjectManager queuing mechanism and instead relies on asio's internal queuing.

Copy link
Contributor

@pcmoritz pcmoritz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, I went through it with Melih, @stephanie-wang: Can you also have a look?

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/4933/
Test PASSed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/4934/
Test PASSed.

Copy link
Contributor

@stephanie-wang stephanie-wang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Can you update the comment that I pointed out before merging?

RAY_CHECK_OK(TransferCompleted(TransferQueue::TransferType::SEND));
return chunk_status.second;
}
// If status is not okay, and this is the first chunk to be gotten for this object,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment about "this is the first chunk to be gotten" isn't correct anymore, right? Can we remove that?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment seems to be correct to me. Can you explain why it's no longer correct?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't it be "If status is not okay, then return immediately..."? I don't think it matters which chunk of the object it is.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/4950/
Test FAILed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/4951/
Test FAILed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/4949/
Test PASSed.

@pcmoritz pcmoritz merged commit ddfc875 into ray-project:master Apr 16, 2018
royf added a commit to royf/ray that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2018
* master:
  Handle interrupts correctly for ASIO synchronous reads and writes. (ray-project#1929)
  [DataFrame] Adding read methods and tests (ray-project#1712)
  Allow task_table_update to fail when tasks are finished. (ray-project#1927)
  [rllib] Contribute DDPG to RLlib (ray-project#1877)
  [xray] Workers blocked in a `ray.get` release their resources (ray-project#1920)
  Raylet task dispatch and throttling worker startup (ray-project#1912)
  [DataFrame] Eval fix (ray-project#1903)
  [tune] Polishing docs (ray-project#1846)
  [tune] [rllib] Automatically determine RLlib resources and add queueing mechanism for autoscaling (ray-project#1848)
  Preemptively push local arguments for actor tasks (ray-project#1901)
  [tune] Allow fetching pinned objects from trainable functions (ray-project#1895)
  Multithreading refactor for ObjectManager. (ray-project#1911)
  Add slice functionality (ray-project#1832)
  [DataFrame] Pass read_csv kwargs to _infer_column (ray-project#1894)
  Addresses missed comments from multichunk object transfer PR. (ray-project#1908)
  Allow numpy arrays to be passed by value into tasks (and inlined in the task spec). (ray-project#1816)
  [xray] Lineage cache requests notifications from the GCS about remote tasks (ray-project#1834)
  Fix UI issue for non-json-serializable task arguments. (ray-project#1892)
  Remove unnecessary calls to .hex() for object IDs. (ray-project#1910)
  Allow multiple raylets to be started on a single machine. (ray-project#1904)

# Conflicts:
#	python/ray/rllib/__init__.py
#	python/ray/rllib/dqn/dqn.py
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants