Skip to content

[3.9] [doc] Remove duplicated operator.itemgetter example (GH-24178) #25646

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 27, 2021

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

  • Remove duplicated itemgetter example
  • Add spaces
    (cherry picked from commit 743e2ba)

Co-authored-by: Andre Delfino adelfino@gmail.com

* Remove duplicated itemgetter example
* Add spaces
(cherry picked from commit 743e2ba)

Co-authored-by: Andre Delfino <adelfino@gmail.com>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andresdelfino and @orsenthil: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andresdelfino and @orsenthil: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andresdelfino and @orsenthil: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

2 similar comments
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andresdelfino and @orsenthil: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andresdelfino and @orsenthil: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@orsenthil orsenthil merged commit 4a3d73d into python:3.9 Apr 27, 2021
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

@orsenthil: Please replace # with GH- in the commit message next time. Thanks!

@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-743e2ba-3.9 branch April 27, 2021 04:16
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andresdelfino and @orsenthil: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants