[doc] Remove duplicated operator.itemgetter example #24178
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
Contributor
|
Thanks @andresdelfino for the PR, and @orsenthil for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8, 3.9. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2021
* Remove duplicated itemgetter example * Add spaces (cherry picked from commit 743e2ba) Co-authored-by: Andre Delfino <adelfino@gmail.com>
|
GH-25646 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch. |
|
GH-25647 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch. |
orsenthil
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2021
orsenthil
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Don't understand how we got here, but we have two examples for operator.itemgetter when used with dictionaries.
These are the PRs that added them:
#1280
#3431
Note that when each PR was created no example existed, yet they vary greatly on date.
Having two examples for the exact same use case is confusing. I'm preserving Raymond's example as it is clearer.
Also, fix markup by removing a blank line.