Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use same cache directory #466

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2024
Merged

Use same cache directory #466

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2024

Conversation

jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Oct 29, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Updated test configurations for the Executor to improve resource allocation and cache file management during test execution.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the TestCacheExecutorPysqa class within the tests/test_cache_executor_pysqa_flux.py file. The modifications involve updating parameters for the Executor instantiation in the test_executor method, specifically changing the cwd parameter and introducing a new cache_directory parameter. These adjustments affect how the Executor manages resources and cache files during testing. The tearDown method remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
tests/test_cache_executor_pysqa_flux.py Updated cwd parameter from "exe_working_directory" to "cache"; added cache_directory with value "cache" in test_executor method.

Possibly related PRs

🐰 In the cache where I hop and play,
The paths have changed in a clever way.
From "exe" to "cache," I now do roam,
With new treasures found, I feel at home!
So let’s test our jumps and bounds with glee,
For a happy cache is the best place to be! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c65100b and c054c7f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/test_cache_executor_pysqa_flux.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/test_cache_executor_pysqa_flux.py (1)

37-37: LGTM! Good alignment of cache and working directories.

The changes consistently use the same directory for both cache storage and working directory, which is a good practice for test organization and cleanup.

Also applies to: 39-39

@@ -34,8 +34,9 @@ class TestCacheExecutorPysqa(unittest.TestCase):
def test_executor(self):
with Executor(
backend="pysqa_flux",
resource_dict={"cores": 2, "cwd": "exe_working_directory"},
resource_dict={"cores": 2, "cwd": "cache"},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consistent test isolation improvements needed across test files

The review suggestion is valid and should be applied consistently across the test suite. The investigation reveals that:

  1. All test files use hardcoded "cache" directory
  2. All files implement tearDown for cleanup, but none use tempfile for isolation
  3. No setUp methods are currently implemented in any of these files
  4. Similar cleanup pattern if os.path.exists("cache"): shutil.rmtree("cache") is repeated

Suggested improvements for all affected files:

  • tests/test_cache_executor_pysqa_flux.py
  • tests/test_executor_backend_mpi.py
  • tests/test_cache_shared.py
  • tests/test_cache_hdf.py
  • tests/test_cache_executor_serial.py
🔗 Analysis chain

Consider improving path handling and test isolation.

While the current implementation works, consider these improvements:

  1. Use tempfile.mkdtemp() for test isolation
  2. Use absolute paths to avoid potential working directory issues

Here's a suggested implementation:

+import tempfile
+
 class TestCacheExecutorPysqa(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        self.test_dir = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="cache_executor_test_")
+
     def test_executor(self):
         with Executor(
             backend="pysqa_flux",
-            resource_dict={"cores": 2, "cwd": "cache"},
+            resource_dict={"cores": 2, "cwd": self.test_dir},
             block_allocation=False,
-            cache_directory="cache",
+            cache_directory=self.test_dir,
         ) as exe:
 
     def tearDown(self):
-        if os.path.exists("cache"):
-            shutil.rmtree("cache")
+        if os.path.exists(self.test_dir):
+            shutil.rmtree(self.test_dir)

Let's check if other test files use similar cache directory patterns:

Also applies to: 39-39


Let's examine the cache directory usage in the other test files to understand the pattern and verify if the suggested improvements should be applied consistently.


Let's check if these test files already have cleanup mechanisms in place and if they use any temporary directory solutions.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for cache directory patterns in test files
echo "Searching for cache directory patterns in tests:"
rg -l "cache_directory|cwd.*cache" tests/

Length of output: 312


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check cache directory usage in the identified test files
echo "=== test_executor_backend_mpi.py ==="
rg "cache_directory|cwd.*cache" tests/test_executor_backend_mpi.py -B 2 -A 2

echo -e "\n=== test_cache_shared.py ==="
rg "cache_directory|cwd.*cache" tests/test_cache_shared.py -B 2 -A 2

echo -e "\n=== test_cache_hdf.py ==="
rg "cache_directory|cwd.*cache" tests/test_cache_hdf.py -B 2 -A 2

echo -e "\n=== test_cache_executor_serial.py ==="
rg "cache_directory|cwd.*cache" tests/test_cache_executor_serial.py -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 4827


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for cleanup and temporary directory usage
echo "=== Checking for tearDown and temporary directory usage ==="
for file in tests/test_executor_backend_mpi.py tests/test_cache_shared.py tests/test_cache_hdf.py tests/test_cache_executor_serial.py; do
    echo -e "\n=== $file ==="
    # Look for tearDown methods and cleanup code
    rg "def tearDown|rmtree|tempfile" "$file" -B 1 -A 3
    
    # Look for setUp methods
    echo -e "\n--- setUp methods in $file ---"
    rg "def setUp" "$file" -B 1 -A 3
done

Length of output: 2585

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit 968b38e into main Oct 29, 2024
23 of 24 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the samecache branch October 29, 2024 16:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant