-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
⚠️ Nightly upstream-dev CI failed ⚠️ #9098
Comments
this looks real, and possibly related to #9081. I think this can be fixed by specifying the precision in the strategy, but cc @ilan-gold, @dcherian |
@keewis Thanks for the cc, but I really have no idea what is going on here. As I said in my PR that fixed a small roundtrip bug, this whole date-time business makes very little sense to me. It should in theory be possible to handle these as extension arrays and preserve the format, but that breaks a bunch of tests and code where the format is not expected (or this other custom data structure is expected) in very insane ways that I couldn't wrap my head around. |
I think the issue is not in the code, but in what we expect to get as the result of the roundtrip: if you look at the generated |
Workflow Run URL
Python 3.12 Test Summary
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: