Skip to content

Update JTAG IDCODE#85

Merged
bluewww merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
various-3
Jun 8, 2022
Merged

Update JTAG IDCODE#85
bluewww merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
various-3

Conversation

@bluewww
Copy link
Collaborator

@bluewww bluewww commented Jun 8, 2022

  • Update idcode
  • Fix wrong ibex halt and exception address

@bluewww bluewww merged commit 7fa2d75 into master Jun 8, 2022
@bluewww bluewww deleted the various-3 branch June 8, 2022 20:02
bluewww added a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2023
After !77

This PR replaces legacy `RI5CY` with `CV32E40P` in either the SoC (FC controller) and the cluster (8 core instances)

**HW (RTL)**:

- [x] Replace cv32e40p with OBI adapter into SoC
- [x] Add FPU wrapper into SoC using APU connection. FPU is now instantiated in `fc_subsystem`
- [x] Replace cv32e40p with OBI adapter into Cluster
- [x] Add `pulp_clock_gating` tech cell for ASIC, disable clock gating for FPGA (as in RI5CY) **[TODO: do it properly without using `ifdef`]** (#85)
- [x] Add one [performance counters test](https://github.com/pulp-platform/regression_tests/tree/cv32perf_counters/perf_counters) in assembly for cv32 to be executed with pulp-runtime

**SW**:

Main SW changes concerns:

1. Different mapping of the HW loops (`Xpulp` extensions)
2. Different structure and mapping of the performance counters
3. Enable clint timer irq (Freertos and RTL)

- [x] Change `PULP RISCV GCC toolchain` version used in the CI with cv32e40p target with: `/usr/pack/riscv-1.0-kgf/pulp-gcc-2.2.0`
- [x] Update `pulp-runtime` with cv32e40p target with: `v0.0.9`
- [x] Update `FreeRTOS` version with cv32e40p target with: `570b2c1c`

**MISC**

- [x] Update README
- [x] Update CHANGELOG

- The testset has been previously overhauled in !63 and !65. In particular !63 removed some tests that used the legacy pulp-sdk and RI5CY and were not a fit anymore with cv32

Within this project boundary, there exits three issues tracked in #87, #86 and #85 that will be addressed in separate MRs

Fixes #59 #60 #84
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant