Skip to content

Conversation

jurasic-pf
Copy link
Collaborator

@jurasic-pf jurasic-pf commented May 6, 2025

Why?

normalize_by_coil_currents had no effect on the resulting response table. I believe there was a mixup of what was meant with num_windings and current.

Loading a polygon filament with 4 fields per row, e.g.

x y z w
1 2 3 1e6

resulted in num_windings=1e6 and current=1. When normalizing, only current was taken into account and not num_windings.

@jurasic-pf jurasic-pf marked this pull request as ready for review May 6, 2025 19:17
@jurasic-pf jurasic-pf requested a review from jons-pf May 6, 2025 19:17
Copy link
Collaborator Author


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

}
}
}
absl::Status status = NumWindingsToCircuitCurrents(magnetic_configuration);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this is the right place to do this. The import should store the 4th column in num_windings. The migration into the circuit currents, for the normalization to work in the response table computation, should be done only there and not here, I think.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants