Skip to content

Translate 04-git-server hosted #119

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 3, 2015
Merged

Translate 04-git-server hosted #119

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 3, 2015

Conversation

branchzero
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@networm networm mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2015
95 tasks
@networm networm modified the milestone: v1.0.0 Jul 29, 2015
If you don't want to go through all of the work involved in setting up your own Git server, you have several options for hosting your Git projects on an external dedicated hosting site.
Doing so offers a number of advantages: a hosting site is generally quick to set up and easy to start projects on, and no server maintenance or monitoring is involved.
Even if you set up and run your own server internally, you may still want to use a public hosting site for your open source code – it's generally easier for the open source community to find and help you with.
如果你不想设立自己的 Git 服务器,你可以选择托管你的 Git 项目到一个外部独立托管站点。
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

去掉 “外部独立” 如何?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

去掉之后,托管到托管站点感觉有些怪,所以把第二个托管改成了寄存,这样感觉如何?
@sanddudu

@sanddudu
Copy link
Contributor

@branchzero 审校完成

@branchzero
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sanddudu 已做出修改。

If you don't want to go through all of the work involved in setting up your own Git server, you have several options for hosting your Git projects on an external dedicated hosting site.
Doing so offers a number of advantages: a hosting site is generally quick to set up and easy to start projects on, and no server maintenance or monitoring is involved.
Even if you set up and run your own server internally, you may still want to use a public hosting site for your open source code – it's generally easier for the open source community to find and help you with.
如果你不想设立自己的 Git 服务器,你可以选择托管你的 Git 项目到一个寄存站点。
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

如果你不想

如果不想

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

到一个寄存站点。

到一个外部专业的托管网站。

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

下面还有几处“站点”,请统一为“网站”吧。

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

托管你的 Git 项目=》将你的 Git 项目托管到

@networm
Copy link
Member

networm commented Jul 30, 2015

@branchzero 已审校。

Even if you set up and run your own server internally, you may still want to use a public hosting site for your open source code – it's generally easier for the open source community to find and help you with.
如果你不想设立自己的 Git 服务器,你可以选择托管你的 Git 项目到一个寄存站点。
这带来了一些好处:一个托管站点可以用来快速建立并开始项目,且无需进行服务器维护和监控工作。
即使你在内部设立并且运行了自己的服务器,你仍然可以为你的开源代码选择使用一个公共托管站点 - 这通常更有助于开源社区来发现和帮助你。
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

你仍然可以为你的开源代码选择使用一个公共托管站点=》你仍然可以把你的开源代码托管在公共托管站点

@IceNature
Copy link
Contributor

@branchzero 已完成

@branchzero
Copy link
Contributor Author

@networm @IceNature 感谢建议,已经完善:)

networm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2015
Translate 04-git-server hosted
@networm networm merged commit b6bc335 into progit:master Aug 3, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants