ci: add pr-review-mention.yml caller stub - #203
Conversation
Adds the standard thin caller stub so @donpetry-bot mention triggers and reviewer-assignment events in this repo dispatch the pr-review agent cascade in petry-projects/.github-private. Closes #113
|
Note Gemini is unable to generate a review for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported. |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
No description provided. |
Matches the canonical standard template (standards/workflows/pr-review-mention.yml) and the updated compliance checker (petry-projects/.github PR #<tbd>).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds the missing pr-review-mention.yml thin caller stub so PR comment mentions / reviewer-assignment events in this repo can route into the org-level pr-review-mention reusable workflow (closing the compliance gap for required workflows).
Changes:
- Introduces
.github/workflows/pr-review-mention.ymlthin-caller workflow that listens toissue_comment,pull_request_review_comment, andpull_request: review_requested. - Wires the job to the centralized reusable workflow
petry-projects/.github/.github/workflows/pr-review-mention-reusable.yml@v1withsecrets: inherit.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
|
@donpetry-bot - please review |
Dev-Lead Fix CI — no-changesPR: #203 | SHA: |
|
No description provided. |
…erit secrets: inherit passes all secrets to the reusable — SonarCloud flags this as a security hotspot. The reusable declares exactly two required secrets; pass only those. Also corrects the header comment to list both secrets. Addresses Copilot review comment and SonarCloud hotspots on PR #203. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
No description provided. |
|
No description provided. |
|
Summary
pr-review-mention.ymlthin caller stub so@donpetry-botmentions and reviewer-assignment events in.github-privatedispatch the pr-review agent cascadeRoot cause
The stub was never deployed to this repo when
pr-review-mentionwas adopted as an org standard (petry-projects/.github@a2b3b46). As a result,issue_commentevents fired here but nothing listened for them.Closes #113
Notes
Uses
@v2— companion PR petry-projects/.github#302 updates the compliance checker to expect@v2forpr-review-mention-reusable, so this stub and the checker are in sync.Test plan
@donpetry-bot - please reviewon a PR in this repo and verify apr-review-mentionworkflow run starts and the bot posts an acknowledgement commentmissing-pr-review-mention.ymlfinding for this repo (issue Compliance: missing-pr-review-mention.yml #113) closes on next Friday run🤖 Generated with Claude Code