This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rphmeier
added
A3-in_progress
Pull request is in progress. No review needed at this stage.
B3-apinoteworthy
C1-low
PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders.
labels
Feb 23, 2021
8 tasks
|
At some point we might improve how the randomness gets collected too ala https://github.com/w3f/research-internal/issues/691 but this requires a protocol upgrade, and thus should be delayed until Sassafras. |
github-actions
bot
added
A0-please_review
Pull request needs code review.
and removed
A3-in_progress
Pull request is in progress. No review needed at this stage.
labels
Feb 23, 2021
andresilva
approved these changes
Mar 1, 2021
we need to track when the current and previous epoch started so that we know the block number by each existing on-chain was known
andresilva
reviewed
Mar 5, 2021
|
||
( | ||
seed, | ||
block_number.saturating_sub(RANDOM_MATERIAL_LEN.into()), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a bit tricky but I think it's the safest thing we can ensure here.
andresilva
reviewed
Mar 5, 2021
@rphmeier I can't add you as a reviewer but I'd appreciate if you could have a look at this. |
shawntabrizi
reviewed
Mar 8, 2021
shawntabrizi
reviewed
Mar 8, 2021
shawntabrizi
reviewed
Mar 8, 2021
shawntabrizi
reviewed
Mar 8, 2021
gavofyork
reviewed
Mar 8, 2021
gavofyork
approved these changes
Mar 8, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aside from the changes to the docs.
This was referenced Mar 10, 2021
shawntabrizi
approved these changes
Mar 10, 2021
bot merge |
Trying merge. |
ghost
deleted the
rh-babe-randomness-api
branch
March 10, 2021 16:31
This was referenced Jun 2, 2021
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
A0-please_review
Pull request needs code review.
C1-low
PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
type Randomness = Babe
lacked a lot of clarity.There are actually 3 types of randomness we'd want to get from BABE with different security and timing considerations. I changed the API of BABE to reflect those so you'd do one of
instead.
TODO in this PR:
polkadot companion: paritytech/polkadot#2504