Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove old UI test #1289

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 30, 2023
Merged

Remove old UI test #1289

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 30, 2023

Conversation

ggwpez
Copy link
Member

@ggwpez ggwpez commented Aug 29, 2023

Default bound for the Genesis builder got removed here #1221, therefore deleting the UI test.

Also cleaning up the UI CI job. Seems to have some legacy dust - i could not determine why this substrate-test-utils was in there 🤔

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
@paritytech-ci paritytech-ci requested review from a team August 29, 2023 21:45
@@ -312,9 +312,8 @@ test-frame-support:
# Ensure we run the UI tests.
RUN_UI_TESTS: 1
script:
- time cargo test --locked -p frame-support-test --features=frame-feature-testing,no-metadata-docs,try-runtime,experimental --manifest-path ./substrate/frame/support/test/Cargo.toml
- time cargo test --locked -p frame-support-test --features=frame-feature-testing,frame-feature-testing-2,no-metadata-docs,try-runtime,experimental --manifest-path ./substrate/frame/support/test/Cargo.toml
- SUBSTRATE_TEST_TIMEOUT=1 time cargo test -p substrate-test-utils --release --locked -- --ignored timeout
Copy link
Member Author

@ggwpez ggwpez Aug 29, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apparently it was running this test:


Either way, it does not belong into a FRAME CI job.

I wonder if we still need this substrate_test_utils::test macro or can use tokio::test instead.

@ggwpez ggwpez added A1-insubstantial Pull request requires no code review (e.g., a sub-repository hash update). R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes labels Aug 29, 2023
@paritytech-ci paritytech-ci requested a review from a team August 30, 2023 05:28
Comment on lines +30 to +32
// Deny all warnings since we emit warnings as part of a Runtime's UI.
std::env::set_var("RUSTFLAGS", "--deny warnings");

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We already do this in the CI job?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes but then the result is different from running it locally.

@ggwpez ggwpez merged commit 7768b77 into master Aug 30, 2023
13 checks passed
@ggwpez ggwpez deleted the oty-fix-ci branch August 30, 2023 09:32
bkchr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2023
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
Daanvdplas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2023
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
bgallois pushed a commit to duniter/duniter-polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Liam Aharon <liam.aharon@hotmail.com>
serban300 pushed a commit to serban300/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
serban300 pushed a commit to serban300/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
serban300 pushed a commit to serban300/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
serban300 pushed a commit to serban300/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
serban300 pushed a commit to serban300/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
serban300 pushed a commit to serban300/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
serban300 pushed a commit to serban300/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
serban300 pushed a commit to serban300/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
serban300 pushed a commit to serban300/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
serban300 pushed a commit to serban300/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
serban300 pushed a commit to serban300/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2024
serban300 pushed a commit to serban300/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2024
bkchr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A1-insubstantial Pull request requires no code review (e.g., a sub-repository hash update). R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants