Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

F/slash jailed validators #137

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 10, 2023
Merged

F/slash jailed validators #137

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 10, 2023

Conversation

maurolacy
Copy link
Collaborator

@maurolacy maurolacy commented Oct 9, 2023

This slashes jailed validators as well as tombstoned ones, for consistency with Consumer side accounting; both on-chain, and in-contract (virtual-staking) after #136.

@maurolacy maurolacy changed the base branch from main to f/slashing-accounting October 9, 2023 08:14
@maurolacy maurolacy requested review from uint and hashedone October 9, 2023 09:28
@maurolacy maurolacy force-pushed the f/slash-jailed-validators branch 3 times, most recently from b6d2c2f to eae2968 Compare October 9, 2023 10:20
@maurolacy maurolacy changed the base branch from f/slashing-accounting to main October 9, 2023 10:34
@maurolacy maurolacy force-pushed the f/slash-jailed-validators branch from eae2968 to 808c1d2 Compare October 9, 2023 10:39
Copy link
Collaborator

@JakeHartnell JakeHartnell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, can't wait to test all this.

@maurolacy maurolacy merged commit 9beccb6 into main Oct 10, 2023
2 checks passed
@maurolacy
Copy link
Collaborator Author

LGTM, can't wait to test all this.

Hi, will do a release once #136, #138 and related follow-ups are merged, which should be soon.

@maurolacy maurolacy deleted the f/slash-jailed-validators branch October 10, 2023 06:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants