Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

GraphDB implementation [moved] #60

Closed
lvca opened this issue Dec 10, 2012 · 0 comments
Closed

GraphDB implementation [moved] #60

lvca opened this issue Dec 10, 2012 · 0 comments

Comments

@lvca
Copy link
Member

lvca commented Dec 10, 2012

This is Issue 60 moved from a Google Code project.
Added by 2010-07-13T22:57:06.000Z by l.garu...@gmail.com.
Please review that bug for more context and additional comments, but update this bug.
Closed (Fixed).

Original labels: Type-Enhancement, Priority-Medium, v0.9.21

Original description

Even if it's straightforward to implement a GraphDB on top of OrientDB, it would be great having a GraphDB class.
@lvca lvca closed this as completed Dec 10, 2012
@henryzhao81 henryzhao81 mentioned this issue May 15, 2015
Closed
lvca added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 15, 2015
@lvca
Merge pull request #62 from profeg/60-ParseCRLF
960f5dd 
#60 issue resolving
@publicocean0 publicocean0 mentioned this issue Aug 6, 2016
Closed
4 tasks
@CyprienGottstein CyprienGottstein mentioned this issue May 29, 2018
Closed
@tolgaulas tolgaulas mentioned this issue Nov 22, 2019
Closed
@madmac2501 madmac2501 mentioned this issue Apr 1, 2020
Closed
@madmac2501 madmac2501 mentioned this issue Jun 7, 2020
Closed
@madmac2501 madmac2501 mentioned this issue Jul 8, 2020
Closed
@madmac2501 madmac2501 mentioned this issue Nov 25, 2020
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@lvca