-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 871
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NUMERIC index bug for long type #6534
Comments
select from r +----+-----+------+----+----+ 3 item(s) found. Query executed in 0.002 sec(s). 0 item(s) found. Query executed in 0.004 sec(s). |
a is integer, b is long |
Why don't use SQL instead of lucene indexes? |
because my class has a billion of rows. The query above is simplified just for your test |
long/integer type are not supported . That means that if you run range query with lucene syntax it will not work since there is not logic in the integration between OrientDB and Lucene to handle range query. |
it would be better to write in documentation this important limitation else developers invests time to develop architectures not working then. In orientdb 3.0 will be available? |
@publicocean0 we can mark this as enhancement. It shouldn't be hard to support it |
surely it requires 10 minutes |
We support range queries over numeric fields and date/datetime fields starting from version 2.2.14. |
OrientDB Version, operating system, or hardware.
Operating System
Expected behavior and actual behavior
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: