Skip to content

Conversation

@opensearch-trigger-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Backport bf5b43d from #18910.

(cherry picked from commit bf5b43d)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@opensearch-trigger-bot opensearch-trigger-bot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner August 7, 2025 03:15
@finnegancarroll
Copy link
Contributor

@prudhvigodithi can merge this bugfix when CI passes?

@prudhvigodithi
Copy link
Member

@finnegancarroll we should update the 3.2 release notes as well, can you please check?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 7, 2025

✅ Gradle check result for 2eec24a: SUCCESS

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 7, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (3.2@5ce98e5). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             3.2   #18954   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage       ?   72.87%           
  Complexity     ?    69307           
======================================
  Files          ?     5642           
  Lines          ?   318636           
  Branches       ?    46107           
======================================
  Hits           ?   232199           
  Misses         ?    67602           
  Partials       ?    18835           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@prudhvigodithi prudhvigodithi merged commit 5cddeb8 into 3.2 Aug 7, 2025
32 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the backport/backport-18910-to-3.2 branch August 7, 2025 04:52
@prudhvigodithi
Copy link
Member

@finnegancarroll we should update the 3.2 release notes as well, can you please check?

NVM I see skip changelog label added to the original PR #18910. So we should be good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants