-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 484
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove label mapping for service.instance.id
#3497
Remove label mapping for service.instance.id
#3497
Conversation
…ce.id`, because multiple containers should never share the same `service.instance.id`
…ce.id`, because multiple containers should never share the same `service.instance.id`
…ce.id`, because multiple containers should never share the same `service.instance.id`
…ce.id`, because multiple containers should never share the same `service.instance.id`
…ce.id`, because multiple containers should never share the same `service.instance.id`
# (Optional) One or more lines of additional information to render under the primary note. | ||
# These lines will be padded with 2 spaces and then inserted directly into the document. | ||
# Use pipe (|) for multiline entries. | ||
subtext: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@zeitlinger could you call out that this is a bug fix and also technically a breaking change? Include some of the details here about why this is a bug fix specifically and not a breaking change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
…ce.id`, because multiple containers should never share the same `service.instance.id`
Co-authored-by: Jacob Aronoff <jaronoff97@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jacob Aronoff <jaronoff97@users.noreply.github.com>
@jaronoff97 please check again |
@zeitlinger i want to think a bit more about this after some of the user feedback in the thread in slack. Maybe we should discuss this at our SIG meeting this week? |
@jaronoff97 as discussed in the meeting last week, this should be good to merge. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added proposal to document with pseudo code the naming strategy as it's quite complex
Co-authored-by: Cyrille Le Clerc <cyrille@cyrilleleclerc.com>
Co-authored-by: Cyrille Le Clerc <cyrille@cyrilleleclerc.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Thank you for the updated documentation, it really helps.
@zeitlinger @cyrille-leclerc Thank you for your contributions here! 🙇 |
|
||
|
||
- `pod.annotation[resource.opentelemetry.io/service.instance.id]` | ||
- `if (config[useLabelsForResourceAttributes]) pod.label[app.kubernetes.io/instance]` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@zeitlinger shouldn't we remove this line from the docs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
useLabelsForResourceAttributes
#3495Testing: updated existing
Documentation: updated existing