spec(ui): declare titleField on KanbanConfigSchema — the one item-titled view config of five that omits the key its four siblings already declare (executes objectui#8367 ruling A, decision batch #87)

Filed by the domain:spec @ objectui seat (session_01Jmxdo7bmeqCQHLSfmLVX9w, os-warren) as the cross-repo leg the ruling below assigns to it. ⛔ Filed unassigned, not claiming — this is objectstack's lane to dispatch.

The ruling this executes — ⛔ not a proposal, and ⛔ not re-openable here

Director seat, decision batch #87, 2026-09-08, recorded at objectstack-ai/objectui#8367 comment 5582071618, and confirmed by the maintainer at comment 5582246697, verbatim: 「批 #87 同意」.

Ruled. titleField joins KanbanConfigSchema in objectstack/packages/spec: optional z.string(), absence resolving through the ADR-0079 record display-name chain exactly as the CalendarConfigSchema docblock already states (ruling #13748 「不要求超过渲染器真正需要的」). This is a regularisation of a family where Calendar / Gallery / Timeline / Gantt already declare the same key under the same name and type — not new surface.

⛔ B refused, and refused as a class: this repo does not declare a key the spec refuses by name. A live key either goes upstream or is removed (契约优先; commandment #0.1 — no renderer-side dialect).

⇒ The direction is settled. What is open here is the implementation, not the choice.

The measurement behind it — taken by the objectui#8367 dev, ⛔ re-derive before quoting

All of the following is quoted from objectui#8367 comment 5574629565, measured against the installed @objectstack/spec 17.3.0 (resolved at node_modules/.pnpm/@objectstack+spec@17.3.0_ai@7.0.65_zod@4.4.3_ — the version was read, not assumed). ⚠️ It was measured on the published dist of 17.3.0, ⛔ not on this repo's source tree, so the first thing to do here is re-derive it against packages/spec/src on current main.

Spec 17.3.0 KanbanConfigSchema = { groupByField: z.string() (required), summarizeField: z.string().optional(), columns: z.array(z.string()) (required) }, z.core.$strict.

titleField is already declared — same spelling, same z.string() — on four sibling view configs:

schema	`titleField`
`CalendarConfigSchema`	optional
`GalleryConfigSchema`	optional
`TimelineConfigSchema`	optional
`GanttConfigSchema`	required
`KanbanConfigSchema`	⛔ absent — this card

Probes, with both controls firing on the same call shape (this is the discipline the reading rests on, and a "not found" without both legs does not count):

KanbanConfigSchema  CONTROL-1  bogus key   -> ok=false  unrecognized_keys=["zzUnlikelyBogusKey__"]   (the parser CAN refuse)
KanbanConfigSchema  CONTROL-2  canonical   -> ok=true   unrecognized_keys=[]                          (a refusal is about the NAME)
KanbanConfigSchema  PROBE      titleField  -> ok=false  unrecognized_keys=["titleField"]
CalendarConfigSchema POSITIVE  titleField  -> ok=true   unrecognized_keys=[]                          (ACCEPTED)

Six other candidate spellings were probed on the same shape and every one was refused: title, titleKey, displayField, primaryField, nameField, labelField.

Why this is a defect and not a wish

The key is live in objectui today. kanbanViewOptions floors it at 'name', ListView forwards it onto the generated object-kanban node, and objectui carries a pin literally named "floors titleField at name, as the four sibling faces do". Today an author writing titleField gets opposite answers from two validation faces — the spec refuses it by name, objectui's mirror accepts it only by not looking (.passthrough()).

⇒ That is the declared-vs-enforced gap, and under ruling A the repair is here, upstream, not in the consumer.

Shape — pre-decided by the spec's own docblock, ⛔ do not redesign

The ruling names the shape rather than leaving it open, because the spec has already written it down for this exact key on CalendarConfigSchema:

titleField: optional z.string().
Absence resolves through the ADR-0079 record display-name chain (titleFormat → displayNameField → type-aware derivation → 'Untitled'), per ruling 视图声明 calendar 可视化但缺 calendar 配置块时，平台不报错——直接渲染成一屏错位画面（全部记录堆在今天） #13748 「不要求超过渲染器真正需要的」.
⛔ Not required — GanttConfigSchema spells it required, and that is the one sibling this card does not copy.

@objectstack/spec: minor. ⛔ No ADR text — the ruling says so explicitly; ADR-0079 and #13748 already carry the semantics.

`Clause-②: yes`

This widens the published accept set of KanbanConfigSchema. The ruling's "not new surface" is about product judgement (the key exists on four siblings under the same name and type), ⛔ not a claim that clause ② does not apply. It applies, and the card carries the tier and the pre-enqueue contract review that go with it.

⚠️ One item deliberately NOT ruled into this card

objectui#7742 records the node-level titleField — the board reading an undeclared titleField on ObjectKanbanSchema. The batch-#87 ruling says the same direction disposes it, "in the same objectstack card if the shape allows".

⛔ This seat did not measure whether the shape allows it, and is ⛔ not asserting that it does. That conditional is handed over as a question, not a fence: does the node-level kanban face have a home in this same schema family, such that one declaration serves both? If yes, land both here and say so. If no, report back on objectui#7742 and it gets its own leg. ⛔ Do not widen this card on an assumption either way.

Executable acceptance criterion

A published @objectstack/spec release whose KanbanConfigSchema accepts titleField — i.e. the four-leg probe above re-run against the released package, with both controls firing, and the PROBE line flipping from unrecognized_keys=["titleField"] to ok=true.

⚠️ The downstream unblock criterion is installability, ⛔ not "merged here": objectui#8367 stays blocked until a released version carrying this is pinned in objectui (its console pin bump), because objectui consumes this package as a published artifact.

Downstream, blocked on this card

finding(app-shell,types): the view-level titleField is undeclared on BOTH faces — the spec refuses it by name, this repo's mirror accepts it only via .passthrough(), and it is live objectui#8367 — flipped to pm:blocked with Blocked-by: pointing here in the same stroke as this filing. Once the pin moves, objectui declares titleField as a real member, .passthrough() stops carrying it, and PR fix(app-shell): stop emitting the third kanban lane spelling groupBy objectui#8356's pinned refused set narrows to exactly ['cardFields'] — ⛔ that pin is never widened.
finding(types,plugin-kanban): the ruled KanbanSchema carries three zero-read members (allowCollapse, cardTemplates, columnWidths) and the board reads an undeclared titleField — enforce-or-remove on the shape objectui#7664 declared objectui#7742 — see the conditional above.

Refs: objectstack-ai/objectui#8367 (the ruling and the measurement) · objectstack-ai/objectui#8221 (the same principle for sort, ⛔ ruled separately and ⛔ not assumed to take the same outcome) · objectstack-ai/objectui#7742 · objectstack-ai/objectui#8356 · ADR-0079 · #13748

Claim: PM loop round 1 (consolidated seat) — start gate: the dev starts when one of the five running devs reports (cap 5, maintainer 「并发加到5个」); the claim is posted now so the slot is held
Session: session_018rzQyhLGC5iVs11V3TzRs5
Branch: claude/issue-16894-kanban-titlefield
Worktree: objectstack-issue-16894
Domain: domain:spec
File surface: packages/spec/src/ui/view.zod.ts (KanbanConfigSchema, :1241-1249), packages/spec/src/ui/view.test.ts (the describe('KanbanConfigSchema') block), generated packages/spec/authorable-surface/ui.json + content/docs/references/ui/view.mdx, .changeset/*.md; read-only measurement of packages/lint/src/validate-list-view-field-refs.ts (POSITIONS.kanban) — reported, not edited (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: S→M, mode:subagent, model: opus (--tier at 419facddee: "no path-derived mandate … Clause ② SUSPECT surface" on view.zod.ts / view.test.ts; built at TIER_DEFAULT, reviewed in-seat at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER = this session, per the standing trial on #16905)
Clause-②: yes — the card body, verbatim: "This widens the published accept set of KanbanConfigSchema. The ruling's "not new surface" is about product judgement … ⛔ not a claim that clause ② does not apply"; KanbanConfigSchema is strictObject, so a declared key flips a refusal to an acceptance and adds ui/KanbanConfig:titleField to the ratchet
Thread-read: none
Serial constraints cleared: none — no open objectstack PR touches packages/spec/src/ui/** or authorable-surface/ui.json (21 open PRs scanned); in-flight domain:spec cards (#16772 system/i18n, #16237 data lane, #15540 field.zod.ts, #14816 i18n.zod.ts) claim no ui/** path. ⚠️ PR #16883 also edits docs/audits/2026-07-unknown-key-strictness-ledger.counts.md — if check:generated moves it, rebase rather than fight. Premise re-derived on origin/main 8d4690b8f5: KanbanConfigSchema still lacks titleField; six item-titled configs exist (the card's table says four and mis-states Timeline as optional — it is required at :966); objectui#7742's node-level half is already declared on ObjectKanbanPropsSchema (component.zod.ts:2711) — the dev reports that back on objectui#7742 and does not widen this card.

Generated by Claude Code

Claim withdrawn at shift close — pm:dispatched → pm:queue, assignee cleared, needs:contract-review removed (it was hung by this session's pre-claim 5594673675 and there is no PR; the next claim re-declares Clause-② for itself). Consolidated seat session_018rzQyhLGC5iVs11V3TzRs5, 2026-09-09T06:32Z, on the maintainer's instruction in this session's chat at 02:59Z, verbatim: 「当前任务处理完就下班」.

The pre-claim's start gate (a slot under the cap of 5) never opened: no worktree, no branch, no dev was ever started for this card, so nothing is on any branch. The dispatch dossier inside 5594673675 (premise checks, file surface, acceptance) remains a valid brief for the next dispatcher — re-run its premise checks against the current tree before dispatching; ⛔ do not inherit its readings.

Generated by Claude Code

Claim: PM loop round 1
Session: session_01JbZnqu8bt6YqfJsr9vaFb3
Branch: claude/issue-16894-kanban-titlefield
Worktree: objectstack-issue-16894
Domain: domain:spec
Seat: domain:spec#2 (seat post #18549 — a SECOND concurrent seat on this lane, opened on the maintainer's explicit instruction; seat 1 is #6017 and this claim does not touch it)
File surface: packages/spec/src/ui/view.zod.ts (KanbanConfigSchema, re-derived this round at :1346 — ⛔ NOT the :1241-1249 of the withdrawn 2026-09-09 claim, the block has moved), packages/spec/src/ui/view.test.ts, the regenerated packages/spec/authorable-surface/ui.json and content/docs/references/ui/view.mdx, .changeset/*.md. Read-only: packages/lint/src/validate-list-view-field-refs.ts, packages/spec/src/type-alias-convention.pin.test.ts (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: M, mode:subagent, model: default judgement tier — quoting this round's own node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --tier packages/spec/src/ui/view.zod.ts packages/spec/src/ui/view.test.ts: "Model tier — no path-derived mandate: the surface hits none of the 3 declared glob(s)" and "Clause ② SUSPECT surface — a hint, not a verdict". Built at default tier, reviewed in-seat at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER per 强制条款②
Clause-②: yes
Thread-read: 5690506734
Serial constraints cleared: packages/spec/src/ui/view.zod.ts is held by no in-flight card. The one neighbouring hold in this directory is packages/spec/src/ui/component.zod.ts (#18305, PR #18403) — a DIFFERENT file, declared here because it is the same directory, not because it intersects. Seat 1's other held files (packages/spec/scripts/build-schemas.ts #18301 · scripts/pm/check-widening-tells.mjs #17848 · scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs #17919 · packages/lint/src/validate-translation-references.ts #18203) are all outside this surface. packages/spec/src/type-alias-convention.pin.test.ts is shared with this seat's own #18190 and is declared READ-ONLY on both.

Premise re-derivation, taken 2026-09-17T00:46Z against origin/main — ⛔ the withdrawn claim's readings are NOT inherited (comment 5597118378 says so in terms: 「re-run its premise checks against the current tree before dispatching; ⛔ do not inherit its readings」).

git grep -n 'titleField' origin/main -- packages/spec/src/ui/view.zod.ts — the sibling family is present and KanbanConfigSchema still omits the key:

line	carrier
`:1057`	`titleField: z.string().optional()`
`:1071`	`titleField: z.string()` (required)
`:1407`	`titleField: z.string().optional()` — the ADR-0079 fallback docblock the ruling names
`:1490`	`titleField: z.string()` (required)
`:1638`	`titleField: z.string().optional()`
`KanbanConfigSchema` `:1346`	⛔ absent — the defect stands

⚠️ The card's sibling table (Calendar/Gallery/Timeline optional, Gantt required) is NOT what this re-derivation reads — the tree shows two required carriers and three optional, and a sixth carrier the card does not list at all. The dev re-derives which schema owns which line before quoting any of it; ⛔ the card's table is not evidence.

The dispatched direction is the ruling's, not this seat's: director batch #87, 2026-09-08, objectui#8367 comment 5582071618, maintainer verbatim 「批 #87 同意」 — optional z.string(), absence resolving through the ADR-0079 record display-name chain. ⛔ Not re-openable here.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
"issue": 16894,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/issue-16894-kanban-titlefield",
"pr": "#18561",
"session": "session_01JbZnqu8bt6YqfJsr9vaFb3",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "KanbanConfigSchema now declares titleField as optional z.string() with a Kanban-flavoured parallel of the CalendarConfigSchema describe, exactly the shape director batch #87 ruled. Tests carry the card's four-leg probe with both controls firing on one call shape (bogus key still refused by name on 'this kanban configuration'; canonical block accepted; titleField flipped from unrecognized_keys to ok=true and surviving the parse as a member) plus an optionality leg. Generated artifacts were regenerated, never hand-edited: authorable-surface/ui.json gained exactly one row, ui/KanbanConfig:titleField, and gen:docs updated three reference pages. The DEFECT premise re-derived intact, but the card's sibling TABLE did not: the tree carries SIX titleField carriers, not five, and Timeline is REQUIRED where the card calls it optional. Ownership re-derived by enclosing schema, not quoted from the card: Gallery :1057 optional, Timeline :1071 required, Calendar :1407 optional, Gantt :1490 required, ListMap :1638 optional, Kanban :1346 absent. The ruling is unaffected because it prescribes the arity directly and names the Calendar docblock, which is the optional one. The card's deliberately-unruled conditional resolves to NO: ObjectKanbanPropsSchema in packages/spec/src/ui/component.zod.ts ALREADY declares titleField, as a deprecated legacy alias for cardTitle ('the board reads cardTitle || titleField'), a different semantic on a different schema, so one declaration cannot serve both faces and this card was not widened. objectui#7742 needs its own leg; that file is held by #18305 / PR #18403 and was read, never touched.",
"tests": "pnpm --filter @objectstack/spec build -> VERDICT command-exit 0 (under scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh, slot issue-16894). pnpm --filter @objectstack/spec typecheck -> TYPECHECK_EXIT=0, 'check:test-typecheck: OK - @objectstack/spec's test layer compiles ... 54 file(s) / 259 error(s) / 144 pinned signature(s)'. pnpm --filter @objectstack/spec test -> TEST_EXIT=0, 'Test Files 483 passed (483)' / 'Tests 13775 passed (13775)'. Targeted: pnpm --filter @objectstack/spec exec vitest run --maxWorkers=2 src/ui/view.test.ts -> 'Test Files 1 passed (1)' / 'Tests 376 passed (376)'. pnpm --filter @objectstack/spec check:generated -> 15 of 15 artifacts up to date after gen:docs. Every exit code was redirected to a file and captured before any pipe. NO ABLATION was owed or run: this card adds a declaration to a strictObject, it adds no guard and no new gate, so there is nothing whose failure mode needs proving; the control legs inside the new test carry that weight instead. One REVERSE-VERIFICATION control WAS run, on check:cross-package-test-inputs: all seven changed paths restored to BASE 79a046f and the changeset removed, gate re-run -> exit 1 with the identical FAIL, proving the red is pre-existing and not this diff. Restore proven the hard way, not by exit code: git checkout HEAD -- (never bare), then 'git diff HEAD' empty AND git hash-object matched the HEAD blob for all seven paths, with an absolute REPO_ROOT trap on EXIT INT TERM. Lint delivered as a PROVEN narrowing: pnpm exec eslint --no-inline-config --format json over the two changed .ts files -> exit 0, 2 files, 0 errors, 0 warnings, count read from the JSON's own length; population 6798 computed from ESLint's own resolved config via ESLint#isPathIgnored over git ls-files, not estimated; invariance is the config's own sentence - this repo 'never enables type-aware linting (no parserOptions.project, no typed @typescript-eslint rules) for ANY file' - so a two-file diff cannot move the verdict on the other 6796. Repo-wide pnpm lint left to CI. All readings taken at final commit 6d01b4b on a tree whose git status --porcelain is empty; origin/main had not moved from the branch point, so no merge was owed.",
"gates": "108 families derived on MY worktree at 6d01b4b via 'node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --commands' over the real 7-path change set (the PM's 78-command lead was for two source files and one commit behind; not reused). All 108 run, each exit code landed to disk before being read, reconciled: 'dispatch-gates --ran: 108 derived family(ies) accounted for - 105 run, 3 NOT-MEASURED (3 DERIVED from a recorded exit 3)'. 103 GREEN. Five non-zero, none a finding against this diff: (1) check:dual-build-cjs-loads, (2) check:lean-entry-closure, (3) check:type-check-debt - all exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET, each refusing because the whole monorepo is not built here; NOT MEASURED, declared to CI. (4) node scripts/check-plugin-teardown-shape.mjs --self-test - exit 1 but a prerequisite refusal in its own words, 'cannot read the positive control at 621a487 ... Deepen the clone'; this checkout is shallow (git rev-parse --is-shallow-repository = true). NOT MEASURED. I deliberately did NOT deepen: an interrupted fetch can leave a lock in the SHARED object store every worktree in this container uses, and the gate itself without --self-test ran GREEN. (5) pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs - exit 1, PRE-EXISTING on the base tree, proven by the control described under tests, not asserted; it names packages/cli/test/init-created-files-summary.e2e.test.ts descending packages/spec/dist/, and this diff touches neither that test nor turbo.json nor any declaration table. Four gates that first refused on prerequisites were UNBLOCKED and re-run green after 'pnpm exec turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/lint --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/client-react --concurrency=2' (34 tasks, exit 0): check:doc-formula-expressions, check:doc-security-posture, check:skill-examples, check:docs-transcript-drift - all exit 0. CI convergence NOT awaited, per standing contract.",
"line_budget": "n/a - the diff touches no skills/** file, so no published-skill line ratchet applies. For the record, the whole change is +58 source lines (view.zod.ts +19, view.test.ts +39), +1 authorable-surface row, +13 changeset lines and 12 regenerated doc lines.",
"deviations": [
"FILE SURFACE, +2 files: content/docs/references/api/protocol.mdx and content/docs/references/data/object.mdx are outside the dispatch's declared surface. Both are GENERATED by the mandated gen:docs run and neither was hand-edited - the kanban config shape is inlined on those two reference pages as well as on ui/view.mdx, so each picks up 'titleField?: string' in its kanban row. Omitting them leaves check:docs red. Every hunk in all three files is this one key and nothing else. Reported, not silently absorbed.",
"CONTRACT CONFLICT, labels: the standing os-dev contract puts 'POST /issues/{n}/labels' in the four-write budget and says to label the PR the moment it opens; this dispatch's Writes section lists only POST /pulls, POST /issues/{n}/comments and an optional PATCH /pulls/{n}. Per the standing file winning on conflict I checked whether a label was owed and found none is: the repo's .github/labeler.yml auto-applies the path labels and had already written documentation, size/s, tests, tooling, protocol:ui on PR 18561 (read back from GET /issues/18561/labels); skip-changeset does not apply because a changeset is present; needs:contract-review is the seat's by this dispatch. So ZERO label writes were made - an absence of a needed write, not an unreported one.",
"NARROWING, declared: the three exit-3 gates above would need the whole monorepo built. I did not build it - that is CI's farm, and holding the shared verify lock for it would have blocked every sibling agent. Declared rather than quietly skipped."
],
"contract_review": "READING ONLY, no label written either way, per dispatch. 'node scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs --pair 18561' -> EXIT 4. Its C1 row: needs:contract-review is on card #16894 while the delivering open draft PR #18561 does NOT carry it, so the DUAL carrier is hung half way and 'the PR carrier - the one a seat reads before flipping ready - is bare'. The script itself states hanging or clearing it from a checker would be self-clearance. Handing the reading to the seat; I neither attached, detached, nor waited.",
"files_changed": [
"packages/spec/src/ui/view.zod.ts",
"packages/spec/src/ui/view.test.ts",
"packages/spec/authorable-surface/ui.json (regenerated - one added row)",
"content/docs/references/ui/view.mdx (regenerated)",
"content/docs/references/api/protocol.mdx (regenerated - beyond declared surface, see deviations)",
"content/docs/references/data/object.mdx (regenerated - beyond declared surface, see deviations)",
".changeset/16894-kanban-config-titlefield.md (@objectstack/spec: minor, Clause-2 yes widening)"
],
"read_only_surfaces_respected": "packages/lint/src/validate-list-view-field-refs.ts read, never edited (finding below). packages/spec/src/type-alias-convention.pin.test.ts never opened for edit and not in the diff - no breach. packages/spec/src/ui/component.zod.ts (held by #18305 / PR #18403) read only, to answer the objectui#7742 conditional.",
"writes": 2,
"api_writes": "2 REST proxy writes: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft PR 18561) and POST /repos//issues/16894/comments (this report). Plus 3 git pushes to the feature branch, which are not REST writes. Zero PATCH: the PR body read back byte-identical apart from the trailing newline GitHub strips, with one line-start 'Clause-2: yes (widening)', first line 'Fixes #16894', exactly one closing-keyword reference in the whole body, and exactly one session-URL footer under its rule line.",
"mcp_calls": 0,
"open_questions": [],
"out_of_scope_findings": [
"TO FILE (class c - a metadata-authoring trap; dedupe words: validate-list-view-field-refs, POSITIONS.kanban, titleField, list-view field ref, kanban): POSITIONS.kanban in packages/lint/src/validate-list-view-field-refs.ts lists groupByField (error), summarizeField (warning) and columns (warning) - and no titleField. Every sibling face lists it: calendar.titleField warns, gantt.titleField and timeline.titleField error. From this release a stale or misspelled kanban.titleField names nothing and is reported by nothing, while the identical typo one block away is caught; the renderer silently falls back to the display name, so the author sees a board that works and a title that is not theirs. The file is READ-ONLY on this card by dispatch, so it was reported and not edited - and the bounded in-place-fix exemption does not apply anyway: it is a different package and would add a verification surface. Nothing in this PR turns it red, and no gate reconciles that table against the spec's member lists (checked: the only pin, validate-list-view-field-refs.test.ts '#14107 - every other walked position', enumerates POSITIONS rows, not spec keys).",
"TO FILE (class a - a reproducible red; dedupe words: cross-package-test-inputs, init-created-files-summary, packages/spec/dist, #7802, declared glob): pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs exits 1 on origin/main 79a046f independent of this card - control-proven, see tests. It reports @objectstack/cli descending a directory tree from packages/spec/dist/ out of packages/cli/test/init-created-files-summary.e2e.test.ts with part of that radius reached by no declared glob. CAVEAT the filer should carry: this was measured on a worktree where packages/spec/dist exists because I built it, so whether CI sees the same red is unverified from here.",
"noted, not filed: KanbanConfigSchema carries no object-level .describe(), where GalleryConfigSchema, TimelineConfigSchema, CalendarConfigSchema and ListMapConfigSchema all do, so its nested-shape heading in the generated reference renders with no description sentence. Cosmetic, generated-docs only, no accept set involved. Successor: whichever card next edits KanbanConfigSchema - it is a one-line addition inside a block that card will already have open.",
"noted, not filed: the card body's sibling table is wrong in two ways (Timeline called optional where the tree has it required; five carriers listed where the tree has six, ListMapConfigSchema unmentioned). Not filed as a defect because the card is being closed by this PR and the PR body records the corrected table; the ruling it executes is unaffected. Successor: none - the record lives in PR 18561's body.",
"noted, not filed: the issue body was checked for sanitizer truncation as instructed. None found - 6732 characters through the REST read, terminating on its own 'Refs:' line, with no truncated tag-shaped fragment anywhere in it."
]
}

Generated by Claude Code

PM 复核 · #16894 / PR #18561 —— 交付核验通过,但本席未达档,⛔ 不审、⛔ 不入队

domain:spec seat 2 (session_01JbZnqu8bt6YqfJsr9vaFb3, seat post #18549), R1, 2026-09-17T01:51Z. 对 GitHub 与树核验,⛔ 不对终报自述核验。

形态与范围(亲核)

GET /pulls/18561:draft: true · base: main · head 6d01b4b63e · changed_files: 7。首行字面 Fixes #16894;Clause-②: yes (widening) 在行首。

⚠️ 终报的 JSON 把这行写成了 ASCII 的 Clause-2:,本席按最坏情况当场验了 PR 正文的真实字节:是 CJK ②,没问题。并用闸门自己的读取器实测该值可读:readClause2Line('Clause-②: yes (widening)') → value=yes arm="widening" ⇒ 尾缀不破坏判据。⛔ 这条是实测,不是看着像。

文件面 +2(content/docs/references/api/protocol.mdx、data/object.mdx),偏差已申报:两者都是 gen:docs 的产物、非手改,漏掉会让 check:docs 变红。受理。

双载体已补齐 —— 这是本席欠的,不是 dev 欠的

Dev 跑 check-clause2-carriers --pair 18561 得 exit 4:needs:contract-review 在卡上、不在 PR 上,闸门半挂。它把读数交回席位而没有自己挂 —— 这是对的,脚本自己写着从检查器挂或清就是自查放行。

本席已在 PR #18561 挂标并回读(6 标齐),重跑 --pair 18561 → exit 0,「both carriers agree」。

⛔ 本席不做条款②复核 —— 档位实测未达

读数	值
`CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER`(`dispatch-gates.mjs:10730`)	`claude-fable-5-1`
本席 `session_context.model`	`claude-opus-5`
本席 `external_metadata.last_served_model`	`claude-opus-5`

⇒ 本席 未达档。按〈执行座位职责〉「条款②复核只在实测达档的席内做…未达档席 ⛔ 不审、不起该档子代理」:

⛔ 本席不做这份复核;
⛔ 本席不起达档子代理去做它(该条同样禁止);
⛔ PR spec(ui): declare titleField on KanbanConfigSchema — the optional key its five item-titled siblings already carry #18561 不翻 ready、不入队 —— 「无席内条款②复核 PASS 在案 ⛔ 禁止入队」;
✅ needs:contract-review 双载体挂着不动,PR 留 draft。

⚠️ 前席收班简报要求下一席「起一个达档复审」。本席不照办:那是给一个自身达档的席位写的交接建议,⛔ 压不过 SKILL.md 的禁令(优先序:章程 > 交接笔记)。据此本卡进入等达档席状态,与前席那 4 条同因待落的 PR 同一堆。

CI —— 收敛中,0 红

head 6d01b4b63e 上 32 个 check:11 个 in_progress,0 红。按 check 名读最新一次运行。⛔ 这不是放行读数,且放行本来也被上一节挡住。

dev 自带的控制实验 —— 值得记

check:cross-package-test-inputs 红。Dev 没有声称它无辜,而是做了反向验证:七个改动路径全部还原到 base 79a046f8c、changeset 移除,git diff HEAD 空且七个 blob 的 hash-object 与 HEAD 一致(带 EXIT/INT/TERM trap),重跑 → 同样的 exit 1。⇒ 红是既存的,证明而非断言。本轮三个 dev 各自独立撞到同一条,两个做了双向 ablation。已有卡 #18353 与 #18440,⛔ 不立孪生卡。

范围外发现

POSITIONS.kanban 缺 titleField 行 —— ⭐ 本席对树复测后确认(kanban :322 只有 groupByField/summarizeField;calendar :332、gantt :340、timeline :359、gallery/map :366 都有),已立 #18565。⚠️ 该卡点明:本 PR 落地前它不可动工,因为在那之前 titleField 在 kanban 上根本不可授权。

Dev 顺带答掉了卡上那个「刻意未裁」的条件:ObjectKanbanPropsSchema 已声明 titleField,但那是 cardTitle 的废弃别名、另一个 schema 上的另一种语义 ⇒ 一处声明服务不了两个面,本卡没有被它扩面。

卡面订正(记录,⛔ 不另立卡)

卡的 sibling 表两处与树不符:Timeline 在树上是 required(卡说 optional),且树上有六个 titleField 载体而非五个(ListMapConfigSchema 未列)。⛔ 不影响裁决 —— 批 #87 直接规定了 arity 并点名 Calendar 的 docblock,而那一个正是 optional 的。订正记录在 PR #18561 正文。

Generated by Claude Code

🚨 升级 —— 本卡的达档阻塞已经不是"一条 PR 等着",而是堵住本车道约 1/8 的可派发队列

domain:spec seat 2 (session_01JbZnqu8bt6YqfJsr9vaFb3, seat post #18549), 2026-09-17T04:00Z. ⛔ 本条不改任何状态,只呈报读数。

现状回顾

PR #18561 交付核验通过(5707217120),但本席实测未达档 —— CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER = claude-fable-5-1,本席 session_context.model 与 last_served_model 皆 claude-opus-5。按〈执行座位职责〉「条款②复核只在实测达档的席内做…未达档席 ⛔ 不审、不起该档子代理」,本席 ⛔ 不审、⛔ 不翻 ready、⛔ 不入队,且 ⛔ 不得起达档子代理代劳。PR 停在 draft,needs:contract-review 双载体挂着。

新读数 —— 外溢范围,本轮实测

packages/spec/src/ui/view.zod.ts 是本车道的枢纽文件。它被 PR #18561 持有,而按同文件硬串行:

80 张 domain:spec 可派发卡(open · pm:queue · 未认领 · 无决策/retriage 标)中,
10 张的正文点名 ui/view.zod.ts 或其中声明的 schema(ListViewSchema / KanbanConfigSchema / GalleryConfig / TimelineConfig / CalendarConfig):

#15184 · #16282 · #16885 · #17232 · #17393 · #17445 · #17499 · #17507 · #17987 · #18048

⚠️ 读数纪律:这 10 张是正文提及,是上界而非确证 —— 有些可能只是引用而不需编辑该文件。本席逐卡读过并确证需要编辑它的有 3 张:#17232、#16885、以及 #15811(后者由源码 grep 确证:ui/view.zod.ts 含 6 处 ExpressionInputSchema,不在上面按正文匹配的名单里 ⇒ 真实数字高于正文匹配)。

⇒ 保守说法:至少 3 张已确证被堵,上界约 10–11 张,约占本车道可派发队列的 1/8。

为什么这轮说得出来

R4 取卡时,按取卡全序排在最前的两张 —— #16885(已裁 B,director 批 #126 item 4,维护者「同意」)与 #15811(已裁 A,director 批 #122 item 2,维护者「同意」)—— 两张都已裁、都可派、都因为这一个文件而取不了。⛔ 不是"暂时没好卡",是最好的两张被同一个塞子堵住。

⛔ 本席不做的事

⛔ 不起达档子代理绕过它 —— 章程同一句话禁止的正是这个。
⛔ 不降档自审 —— 「未达档席 ⛔ 不审」。
⛔ 不翻 ready 不入队 —— 「无席内条款②复核 PASS 在案 ⛔ 禁止入队」。
⛔ 不照前席收班简报的"起一个达档复审"行事 —— 那是写给自身达档席位的交接建议,压不过章程。
⛔ 不因为队列堵了就把本卡降级处理。塞子的存在不是绕过规则的理由。

需要维护者的一个动作

安排一个实测达档(claude-fable-5-1)的席位来做这一份条款②复核。它一旦 PASS,#18561 入队落地,上述整簇卡同时解冻。

⚠️ 另有一簇同因待复核的卡在席 1 手里(#18492 · #18503 · #18525 · #18528,皆 Clause-②: yes),⛔ 那些不是本席的面,但同一个安排应该能一并解开。

Generated by Claude Code

授权在案 —— 维护者令本席按 PR #18511 的新规则,起达档子代理复核

domain:spec seat 2 (session_01JbZnqu8bt6YqfJsr9vaFb3, seat post #18549), 2026-09-17T07:22Z.

维护者原话(逐字,本会话 chat)

你现在就可以用新规则起达档子代理复核 #18561

前一轮维护者递来 PR #18511 的链接,本席回报了三条读数;这是对该回报的答复。

规则状态 —— 本席如实记录它尚未合并

新文本 '起隔离达档子代理转录核档采信' 在 origin/main : 0
旧文本 '不审、不起该档子代理'          在 origin/main : 1
LIT control '条款②复核' 在 origin/main            : 2   ⇒ 零是读数,⛔ 不是断路
PR #18511 已落 main                              : 否
PR #18511 授权批准                                : os-zhuang APPROVED 2026-09-17T07:15:10Z
GOVERNED_APPROVERS(常量,本席现读)               : ['os-zhuang', 'hotlong']

⇒ 本席按 维护者裁决 > AGENTS.md > 红线 > 核心条款 > 细则 的优先序行事:新规则虽未落 main,但维护者是其治理来源且已明示启用。⛔ 本席不据此自行推断其它未合并规则可用;本授权只及于本卡这一次复核。

⛔ 本席未做、也不会做的

⛔ 未对 PR skills(pm-dispatch): off-tier seat discharges clause-② review by spawning an at-tier subagent (ruling C) #18511 提交任何批准 review(受管面,永不批准)。
⛔ 未合并 PR skills(pm-dispatch): off-tier seat discharges clause-② review by spawning an at-tier subagent (ruling C) #18511,⛔ 未碰它 —— 它是 domain:skills 的卡(finding(pm-dispatch): SKILL.md forbids an off-tier seat from spawning a clause-② review subagent while contract-review.md prescribes exactly that — so a default-tier lane has no legal route to a Clause-② yes verdict at all #18434,assignee os-justin),不是本车道。
⛔ 不自审本卡的条款② —— 本席实测 claude-opus-5 < CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER(claude-fable-5-1),新规则同样禁止未达档席自审。

按新规则自身的护栏执行

起隔离的达档复核子代理,只喂卡片、既有裁决与 PR 本体;⛔ 不喂本席的派发令,⛔ 不喂本席的验收结论;简报写成对抗性。
档位不取 get_session(那量的是派发会话)—— 取子代理转录中逐请求的 model 盖章,按 N/N 报数。
PASS、FAIL 与作废都落记录;同 head 再起子代理须引前次作废因,⛔ 不重起求 PASS。
复核记录用 check-clause2-carriers --template 的同形格式,Served-tier: 写常量名。

所审 head:6d01b4b63e07b5fbdc0069ce8f5143167b9813ff(现读,PR 仍 draft,mergeable_state: clean)。

⚠️ 本 PR 经 check-governed-merges --pr 18561 判 NOT governed ⇒ PASS 之后走普通队列落地,⛔ 不是受管面的四件套。

Generated by Claude Code

✅ MERGED —— `origin/main` 亲验;卡由 `Fixes` 代关,标同笔摘

domain:spec seat 2(session_01JbZnqu8bt6YqfJsr9vaFb3,座位贴 #18549),R7。⏱️ 本条全部读数取自同一动作:2026-09-17T08:18Z。

reading	value
squash commit	`0bd7dae9b1` — `spec(ui): declare` titleField`on`KanbanConfigSchema `— the optional key its five item-titled siblings already carry (#18561)`
parents	单亲
method	`git log --oneline origin/main \| grep -F '(#18561)'`,⛔ 非 `--grep`、⛔ 非 API `merged`
`origin/main` tip when read	`ad067addec`

主题探针 —— 亮控 ×3 + 暗控 ×2

LIT   view.zod.ts 上 `titleField: z.string().optional()`        4   (Gallery·Calendar·ListMap 既有 + 本次 Kanban)
LIT   authorable-surface/ui.json 的 `ui/KanbanConfig:titleField` 1
LIT   生成参考页 view.mdx 出现 titleField                        54
DARK  packages/lint 的 POSITIONS.kanban 长出 titleField(必须 0)  0
DARK  伪造键 zzNotAKey9999(必须 0)                              0

⭐ 第一条暗控问的是范围有没有溢出:复核员的边界旗 (a) 点名了 POSITIONS.kanban 缺 titleField 这个洞,而本 PR 不该顺手修它 —— 它是 #18565。落地形态读到 0,说明切分在树上成立,⛔ 不只是评审时的口头承诺。

os-regen 静默吞并检查 —— 数字对得上复核记录

本 PR 碰 authorable-surface/** 与 content/docs/references/**,两者都在 grep os-regen .gitattributes 的清单上,所以队列合并同样可能静默丢边。落地后实测:

authorable-surface/ui.json 总行数        1219   (达档复核在 head 上测得 1218 → 1219)
其中 `ui/KanbanConfig:*` 行数               4   (复核测得 3 → 4)

⇒ 与复核记录逐位吻合,兄弟条目一条未丢。

收口

PR 正文全文扫闭合关键词(⛔ 不只看首行):只有 Fixes #16894 一处,无 Part of。⇒ 合并只关了本卡,车道盘点复核后无任何卡被静默误关。本卡 state: closed / completed,pm:dispatched 已同笔摘除。

条款② 留痕

达档复核记录:5710778226,PASS,所判 head 6d01b4b63e。
采纳与清标 provenance:5710846911。
⭐ 本卡是本席第一张走「未达档席起隔离达档子代理」新路(skills(pm-dispatch): off-tier seat discharges clause-② review by spawning an at-tier subagent (ruling C) #18511,ruling C)落地的卡。

本 PR 没有做、且各有去处的三件

(a) POSITIONS.kanban 的 lint 洞 → [finding] POSITIONS.kanban is the one item-titled face with no titleField row — from #16894 the key is authorable and a misspelt one is walked by nothing, while the identical typo on calendar/timeline errors #18565(已立,⛔ 未立孪生)。
(d)(e) objectui 侧:ObjectView.tsx 那道 || 'name' 地板、以及 TSDoc 链序 → objectui#8367 的 objectui 腿。
(f) 下游解锁是可安装性不是合并:objectui#8367 要等带本键的 @objectstack/spec 发版并在 objectui 里 pin 住。

🔓 顺带解锁

packages/spec/src/ui/view.zod.ts 是本车道的枢纽塞子,随本 PR 落地已拔出。逐卡确证需要编辑它的三张卡 —— #17232 · #16885 · #15811 —— 自此可派。

Generated by Claude Code

spec(ui): declare `titleField` on `KanbanConfigSchema` — the optional…

fix(lint): walk `kanban.titleField` at calendar's level — the one ite…

spec(ui): declare titleField on KanbanConfigSchema — the one item-titled view config of five that omits the key its four siblings already declare (executes objectui#8367 ruling A, decision batch #87) #16894

Description

The ruling this executes — ⛔ not a proposal, and ⛔ not re-openable here

The measurement behind it — taken by the objectui#8367 dev, ⛔ re-derive before quoting

Why this is a defect and not a wish

Shape — pre-decided by the spec's own docblock, ⛔ do not redesign

Clause-②: yes

⚠️ One item deliberately NOT ruled into this card

Executable acceptance criterion

Downstream, blocked on this card

Activity

yinlianghui commented on Sep 9, 2026

yinlianghui commented on Sep 9, 2026

os-bill commented on Sep 17, 2026

os-bill commented on Sep 17, 2026

os-bill commented on Sep 17, 2026

PM 复核 · #16894 / PR #18561 —— 交付核验通过,但本席未达档,⛔ 不审、⛔ 不入队

形态与范围(亲核)

双载体已补齐 —— 这是本席欠的,不是 dev 欠的

⛔ 本席不做条款②复核 —— 档位实测未达

CI —— 收敛中,0 红

dev 自带的控制实验 —— 值得记

范围外发现

卡面订正(记录,⛔ 不另立卡)

os-bill commented on Sep 17, 2026

🚨 升级 —— 本卡的达档阻塞已经不是"一条 PR 等着",而是堵住本车道约 1/8 的可派发队列

现状回顾

新读数 —— 外溢范围,本轮实测

为什么这轮说得出来

⛔ 本席不做的事

需要维护者的一个动作

os-bill commented on Sep 17, 2026

授权在案 —— 维护者令本席按 PR #18511 的新规则,起达档子代理复核

维护者原话(逐字,本会话 chat)

规则状态 —— 本席如实记录它尚未合并

⛔ 本席未做、也不会做的

按新规则自身的护栏执行

os-bill commented on Sep 17, 2026

✅ MERGED —— origin/main 亲验;卡由 Fixes 代关,标同笔摘

主题探针 —— 亮控 ×3 + 暗控 ×2

os-regen 静默吞并检查 —— 数字对得上复核记录

收口

条款② 留痕

本 PR 没有做、且各有去处的三件

🔓 顺带解锁

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

spec(ui): declare `titleField` on `KanbanConfigSchema` — the one item-titled view config of five that omits the key its four siblings already declare (executes objectui#8367 ruling A, decision batch #87) #16894

`Clause-②: yes`

✅ MERGED —— `origin/main` 亲验;卡由 `Fixes` 代关,标同笔摘