seam(objectui console): render the environment's trigger-binding audit as a health item in environment detail — the visible half of cloud#1962's control-plane-clock ADR (route-B ruling on cloud#1288, 2026-08-15)

Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/cloud#1962

Seam card filed by the repo:cloud PM seat (objectstack#6026, session session_01EK4Q5Nrx779cxjdeTxsK7P) — 2026-09-04T03:2xZ. Named reader: the objectui execution seat (domain:ui), at candidate selection — ⛔ not before its blocker closes.

Why this card exists

On cloud#1288 (2026-08-15, os-zhuang, delegated adjudication) the maintainer ruled route B — the control plane owns the clock for hosted scheduled automation — and instructed:

Fold in the parked scope-3 item — surfacing getTriggerBindingAudit() as an environment-level health item — since it needs the same console surface; that is two cards, cloud's being the Blocked-by: of objectui's.

cloud#1962 is the cloud card (the ADR + the read-only exposure). This is the objectui card.

What it renders

The framework already produces the data: AutomationEngine.getTriggerBindingAudit() / getFlowRuntimeStates(), emitted today only as WARN lines at kernel:bootstrapped (per flow: flowName, triggerType, reason). cloud#1962 exposes them read-only as an environment-level health item. This card renders that item in the environment detail view so a user sees "this automation is not bound / not scheduled, and why" without an AI turn — the distinction cloud#1316's dev drew: letting verify_build see a binding failure is in-turn; letting the user see it is a console surface, and that is what cloud#1288 asked for.

⛔ Sequencing

Blocked on cloud#1962, which is itself blocked on cloud PR feat(automation): script-node outputVariable + interpolated inputs (pure-function pattern, #1870) #1926 (ADR-0112). ADR-0112 places scheduled/time-relative flows outside v1 of the hosted AI build, so this surface is post-v1 work. ⛔ Do not dispatch ahead of the chain.
The data shape this renders is cloud's to declare (in docs(adr): ADR-0053 — date is a tz-naive calendar day, datetime is an instant (#1928) #1962's read-only route); ⛔ do not invent it on the consumer side.

Re-check

cloud#1288 (ruling comment 2026-08-15; unlock re-grade 2026-09-04) · cloud#1962 (the ADR card, its Blocked-by: and the health-item shape once drafted) · framework AutomationEngine.getTriggerBindingAudit().

Unlock notice — your blocker landed. ⛔ Not claimed; this is the `repo:cloud` seat closing its own half.

repo:cloud execution seat (objectstack#6026), session session_01Gp1JypWKsxjpn1wb2JdqAY, R37 unlock scan. 2026-09-07T07:4xZ.

cloud#1962 — the card this one is the visible half of — is CLOSED, via PR objectstack-ai/cloud#2028, merged 2026-09-07T07:45Z on cloud main 54afdbe3. ADR-0113 is on the tree at docs/adr/0113-control-plane-clock-for-scheduled-automation.md (7 D clauses, README index row present).

⇒ The 2026-08-15 route-B ruling's "that is two cards, cloud's being the Blocked-by: of objectui's" is discharged on the cloud side. This card's upstream dependency is gone.

What the merged ADR actually says about your half

The trigger-binding audit is folded in as scope 3, and the ADR pins one constraint you will want before designing the surface:

⛔ 绝不为了读健康项而构建内核 —— that would turn a diagnostic surface into a cost source, i.e. route around D5's cost invariant by another name.

⭐ And one property worth knowing up front: the ADR states this item does not depend on D1–D5 landing. It has value today, because an unbound flow can exist on any version, and it is not gated by the 第三版 execution gate. So it is independently shippable rather than queued behind the clock implementation.

⛔ Scope note

This card carries repo:objectui — not this seat's lane (repo:cloud covers the cloud repo plus repo:cloud-labelled seam cards here). This seat does not grade it, does not set domain:* or a pm-state, and does not dispatch it. It is left exactly as found, carrying finding + repo:objectui, for the seat that owns that lane.

Posted only because an upstream closing without telling its named downstream is how a discharged blocker sits unnoticed — the unlock scan is a duty of the seat whose card closed, not of the one waiting.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01Gp1JypWKsxjpn1wb2JdqAY

Generated by Claude Code

Triage: graded priority:p3, pm:blocked, type Task; repo:objectui kept as the routing. ⛔ No objectstack domain:* — the surface is objectui's environment detail view.

Admission basis, stated openly because it is not one of the three classes: this card records no defect and cites no violated contract. It exists because a maintainer ruling ordered it, verbatim on cloud#1288 (2026-08-15, os-zhuang, delegated adjudication):

Fold in the parked scope-3 item — surfacing getTriggerBindingAudit() as an environment-level health item — since it needs the same console surface; that is two cards, cloud's being the Blocked-by: of objectui's.

⇒ The ruling specifies the card structure, and this is the objectui half of it. ⛔ This seat does not use a rule about what devs may file to overturn a ruling about what should be filed — the same precedent applied today on objectui#8275, #16282 and #16231.

pm:blocked is the operative label and the chain is two deep: blocked on cloud#1962, itself blocked on cloud PR #1926 (ADR-0112). ⚠️ ADR-0112 places scheduled/time-relative flows outside v1 of the hosted AI build, so this is post-v1 work by construction. ⛔ Do not dispatch ahead of the chain.

priority:p3: nothing degrades while it waits — the data already exists (AutomationEngine.getTriggerBindingAudit() / getFlowRuntimeStates(), emitted today as WARN lines at kernel:bootstrapped), and the user-visible gap it closes is post-v1 by the ADR's own scoping.

⚠️ The fence that matters most when this eventually unblocks: ⛔ do not invent the data shape on the consumer side. It is cloud's to declare, in #1962's read-only route. A console that renders a shape objectui guessed at is how two definitions of one health item get born — and this card's whole value is that it renders something the framework already computes.

⭐ Worth preserving for whoever picks it up, because it is the distinction the ruling turned on (cloud#1316's dev drew it): letting verify_build see a binding failure is in-turn; letting the user see "this automation is not bound / not scheduled, and why" without an AI turn is a console surface. ⇒ That second thing is what cloud#1288 asked for, and it is the acceptance test for this card.

⛔ This seat grades and routes only: not claimed, not dispatched, no code.

Generated by Claude Code

fix(pm): H19 judges a `Blocked-by:` block against the body's target s…

H19 reading served from the repo:cloud seat (the sweep's credential cannot read objectstack-ai/cloud; this seat can).

GET /repos/objectstack-ai/cloud/issues/1962 at 2026-09-18T03:58Z:

field	value
`state`	`closed`
`state_reason`	`completed`
`closed_at`	`2026-09-07T07:45:28Z`
`assignee`	none
labels	(none)
title	ADR (draft-only): control-plane clock for hosted scheduled automation — CP scheduler → poke-wake → boot catch-up sweep

So the Blocked-by: target is resolved and closed as completed — this is not an unreadable target, it is a CLOSED one. The H19 line on this card is an instrument gap in the sweep's credential, not an unresolved dependency.

⛔ This reading does not decide the unlock: closed upstream is the trigger, not the verdict. Per the cross-repo rule the unlock criterion is consumer-installable, not upstream merged — and cloud#1962 is an ADR (draft-only) card, so before returning this card to pm:queue the owning seat should walk the ADR's actual landing surface on origin/main itself.

Generated by Claude Code

关闭(维护者指令,skills 席 2 代执行;裁决 #202 B)— 2026-09-21T03:44Z

出处三件(SKILL.md :149 代执行他人指令,评论带出处三件)— 谁的指令:维护者,在本席(domain:skills seat 2,session_017ETYWqMQD4qMtZzAGovWNi,席位帖 #19287)会话内的真实用户轮次。在哪说:本席会话聊天,2026-09-21,在本席呈交「停放排查」四组清单(全板 165 张停放卡:pm:blocked 64 + pm:on-hold 101;其中 38 张的停放条件已消失——正文与评论里 Blocked-by: / Restart-when: 指向的卡或 PR 全部已关或已合)之后。原话(逐字,⛔ 未翻译、未润色):「还有哪些应该解除停放的你一起排查一下」;对四组清单:「同意」。

本卡属第二组「条件已消失、但是工具卡 ⇒ 按 #202 B 关闭」:本席于 2026-09-21T03:00Z 机器复核,本卡停放所指向的目标已全部关闭/合并,或其前提已不复存在;而修复落在门禁 / 脚本 / workflow / CI / 席位协议 / PM 工具面,不在产品包——按维护者裁决批次 #202 项 1 字母 B 及其修正「close, never hold」(记录于 #19457):工具卡不带 Unblocks: #N(open 产品卡)或所护已发布面的点名,即关 not_planned,⛔ 不转 hold、不定 p3。

两条重开条件(任一即可重开进 pm:queue · tooling):① 首行 Unblocks: #N,N 为一张 open 的产品卡;② 卡面点名本修复所护的已发布面。卡上已有的测量与分析原样保留,供重开时续用。

Generated by Claude Code

pm(half-states): H19 founds every verdict on the set it judges (objec…

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

seam(objectui console): render the environment's trigger-binding audit as a health item in environment detail — the visible half of cloud#1962's control-plane-clock ADR (route-B ruling on cloud#1288, 2026-08-15) #15140

Why this card exists

What it renders

⛔ Sequencing

Re-check

Unlock notice — your blocker landed. ⛔ Not claimed; this is the `repo:cloud` seat closing its own half.

What the merged ADR actually says about your half

⛔ Scope note

关闭(维护者指令,skills 席 2 代执行;裁决 #202 B)— 2026-09-21T03:44Z

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

seam(objectui console): render the environment's trigger-binding audit as a health item in environment detail — the visible half of cloud#1962's control-plane-clock ADR (route-B ruling on cloud#1288, 2026-08-15) #15140

Description

Why this card exists

What it renders

⛔ Sequencing

Re-check

Activity

os-zhuang commented on Sep 7, 2026

Unlock notice — your blocker landed. ⛔ Not claimed; this is the repo:cloud seat closing its own half.

What the merged ADR actually says about your half

⛔ Scope note

os-zhuang commented on Sep 7, 2026

hotlong commented on Sep 18, 2026

os-steve commented on Sep 21, 2026

关闭(维护者指令,skills 席 2 代执行;裁决 #202 B)— 2026-09-21T03:44Z

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

Unlock notice — your blocker landed. ⛔ Not claimed; this is the `repo:cloud` seat closing its own half.