-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
feat(test): validate commands and generators #317
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #317 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 49.39% 65.81% +16.41%
===========================================
Files 80 80
Lines 6818 6818
Branches 281 316 +35
===========================================
+ Hits 3368 4487 +1119
+ Misses 3447 2328 -1119
Partials 3 3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sweet
Feel free to fast-track if needed. |
I don't see a need to, it's not urgent |
FYI this repo doesn't require any time before merging |
This repository extends the Web Team contributing guidelines. |
Oh 😥 |
Follow-up #315: Prevents that from happening in the future by validating the command objects as a test.