Use homeModules as flake output name for Home Manager modules (backport #3387) #3388
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains a handful of changes centered around the flake output for Home Manager modules. My understanding is that, recently, convention has been converging on using
homeModules
as the name of the flake output (as this is closer tohomeConfigurations
and more in line withnixosModules
/nixosConfigurations
), which is the focus of this PR.This PR contains a few commits. The first simply adds
homeModules
as an alias ofhomeManagerModules
. The second migrates documentation and internal uses ofhomeManagerModules
to usehomeModules
instead, and the third inverts the first by defininghomeManagerModules
in terms ofhomeModules
, treating it as a backward-compatibility layer. I'm not sure what the stance of the project is on this issue, but while I'd personally like to see all three land, just havinghomeModules
available as an option (i.e., just the first commit here) would satisfy me.This is an automatic backport of pull request #3387 done by Mergify.