Repository navigation
docs(research): the disk-tiered MoE streaming analysis against llm_shared/optimization (#13030) - #16571
Conversation
…m_shared/optimization (#13030) Research handed off by a research-only session. The external engine stays unnamed, per the third-party naming convention. Findings are filed as #16569 (a sampled fidelity score for every lossy optimization) and #16570 (persisted layer access frequency, blocked by #13035). Two ideas are rejected on hidden metrics, and one structural MoE-sparsity gap is recorded without being filed.
|
Important
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars. ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Content review: approve. Well-sourced research write-up, docs-only. Verified both "filed separately" findings exist and match the description exactly: #16569 (fidelity-score-on-lossy-toggles, OPEN) and #16570 (persisted access-frequency, blocked by #13035, OPEN). Correctly gates its "What We Can Adopt" verdicts against the existing #13031-13036 audit state (notably: #13035's adapter-never-registered means the underlying engine has no production caller yet, which the doc explicitly uses to discount throughput claims to zero and count only maintenance cost — good discipline). Evidence is concrete file:line citations against the current tree, not just prose claims. No manual link (closingIssuesReferences=[]), matches body (closes nothing, as stated). CI green. Ready to add to a batch. |
Refs #13030
Single-issue rationale: a docs-only research write-up for the #13030 umbrella. The findings are filed as their own issues (#16569, #16570), so this PR carries only the analysis and its index row.
Thinking Path
A research-only session compared an external disk-tiered MoE expert-streaming engine with AutoBot's
llm_shared/optimization/stack, with Phase 1 and Phase 2 done under the audit-first gate. It made no commits and left the doc uncommitted in the shared main checkout. That tree must stay clean, so the doc lands here on a branch cut from the latestorigin/main.What Changed
docs/research/moe-expert-tiered-streaming.md: the analysis, with file:line evidence intollm_shared/optimization/. The external engine stays unnamed, per the third-party naming convention. A closing "Filed issues" table maps each finding to its issue.docs/research/_index.md: the index row, citing umbrella(optimization): large-model inference on lean hardware is scaffolded but non-functional — 7 defects #13030 and the filed issues.Findings:
LayerInferenceAdapter.Verification
d03f48d1c.Model Used
Claude Opus 5 (coordinator session). The research itself came from a separate research-only session.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code