Skip to content

docs(research): the disk-tiered MoE streaming analysis against llm_shared/optimization (#13030) - #16571

Merged
mrveiss merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
issue-13030-moe-tiered-research
Sep 13, 2026
Merged

mrveiss merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
issue-13030-moe-tiered-research

Conversation

@mrveiss

@mrveiss mrveiss commented Sep 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Refs #13030

Single-issue rationale: a docs-only research write-up for the #13030 umbrella. The findings are filed as their own issues (#16569, #16570), so this PR carries only the analysis and its index row.

Thinking Path

A research-only session compared an external disk-tiered MoE expert-streaming engine with AutoBot's llm_shared/optimization/ stack, with Phase 1 and Phase 2 done under the audit-first gate. It made no commits and left the doc uncommitted in the shared main checkout. That tree must stay clean, so the doc lands here on a branch cut from the latest origin/main.

What Changed

Findings:

Verification

Model Used

Claude Opus 5 (coordinator session). The research itself came from a separate research-only session.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…m_shared/optimization (#13030)

Research handed off by a research-only session. The external engine stays unnamed, per the third-party naming convention. Findings are filed as #16569 (a sampled fidelity score for every lossy optimization) and #16570 (persisted layer access frequency, blocked by #13035). Two ideas are rejected on hidden metrics, and one structural MoE-sparsity gap is recorded without being filed.
@mrveiss mrveiss added this to the Backlog milestone Sep 12, 2026
@mrveiss mrveiss added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation priority: low labels Sep 12, 2026
@mrveiss mrveiss self-assigned this Sep 12, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: f87e4d19-5126-425d-826c-e67fd67299d6


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Notice: 29 open PRs — past the runaway threshold (25)

There is no PR queue limit, and this is not a request to defer this PR. Work proceeds one issue at a time without a cap on open PRs; review capacity is the constraint.

This notice only means the count is high enough to be worth a glance for a runaway — something opening PRs in a loop, or a merge pipeline that has stalled so nothing is draining.

Currently open:

If the queue is draining normally, ignore this. Otherwise:

  1. Check whether CI is dispatching at all — see the ci-dispatch-watchdog status on these PRs
  2. Merge the ones whose CI has finished and review has passed: gh pr merge <number> --squash --delete-branch
  3. Look for a loop opening near-identical PRs

Warn-only runaway detector — .github/workflows/pr-queue-gate.yml. It never blocks a merge.

@mrveiss

mrveiss commented Sep 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Content review: approve.

Well-sourced research write-up, docs-only. Verified both "filed separately" findings exist and match the description exactly: #16569 (fidelity-score-on-lossy-toggles, OPEN) and #16570 (persisted access-frequency, blocked by #13035, OPEN). Correctly gates its "What We Can Adopt" verdicts against the existing #13031-13036 audit state (notably: #13035's adapter-never-registered means the underlying engine has no production caller yet, which the doc explicitly uses to discount throughput claims to zero and count only maintenance cost — good discipline). Evidence is concrete file:line citations against the current tree, not just prose claims.

No manual link (closingIssuesReferences=[]), matches body (closes nothing, as stated). CI green. Ready to add to a batch.

This was referenced Sep 12, 2026
@mrveiss
mrveiss merged commit 846edba into main Sep 13, 2026
46 checks passed
@mrveiss
mrveiss deleted the issue-13030-moe-tiered-research branch September 13, 2026 13:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation priority: low

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant