Skip to content

Conversation

mmustafa-tse
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

  • Same summary as this PR we had for the GTM kit

Testing Plan

  • [Y] Was this tested locally? If not, explain why.
  • Tested E2E locally with overrides as well as unit tested

Reference Issue (For mParticle employees only. Ignore if you are an outside contributor)

common.consentMappings
);

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

test/tests.js Outdated
window.dataLayer[5][0].should.equal('consent');
window.dataLayer[5][1].should.equal('update');
window.dataLayer[5][2].should.deepEqual(expectedDataLayerFinal[2]);
// Consent Update is index 5
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what even is index 4?

@rmi22186 rmi22186 merged commit 0cd8f36 into mparticle-integrations:development Oct 8, 2024
2 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2024
## [2.1.3](v2.1.2...v2.1.3) (2024-10-09)

### Bug Fixes

* send default and update consent payloads on kit init ([#48](#48)) ([0cd8f36](0cd8f36))
@mparticle-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.1.3 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants