Skip to content

Conversation

@brizental
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@brizental brizental requested a review from Dexterp37 December 14, 2020 17:08
Copy link
Contributor

@Dexterp37 Dexterp37 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I took a first high level pass :) Will take a closer look after this first round.

@brizental brizental requested a review from Dexterp37 December 15, 2020 10:15
brizental added 6 commits December 15, 2020 12:57
They are unnecessary since the check-size job was disabled.
Since this is the first metric type to be implemented,
I had to change a bit the database module to record
and return a special MetricPayload type instead of simply a string.
@brizental brizental requested a review from Dexterp37 December 15, 2020 14:30
Copy link
Contributor

@Dexterp37 Dexterp37 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See my other comments. My major concern is about the requirement to pass in the Glean object to the specific metrics API.

@brizental brizental requested a review from Dexterp37 December 16, 2020 08:53
Copy link
Contributor

@Dexterp37 Dexterp37 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r+wc

@Dexterp37
Copy link
Contributor

@brizental can you also file a bug for adding documentation? Did we settle on adding docs to the Glean Book?

@brizental
Copy link
Contributor Author

@brizental can you also file a bug for adding documentation? Did we settle on adding docs to the Glean Book?

Done https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1682785.

Yes, on the MVP proposal we settled on the Glean book and I still stand by that decision, even though I am not clear on how we add Glean.js docs there.

@brizental brizental merged commit d400397 into mozilla:main Dec 16, 2020
@brizental brizental deleted the 1679379-boolean branch December 16, 2020 10:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants