add alert pragma to unsafe functions #186
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates across various modules focus on enhancing documentation clarity and consistency by incorporating Changes
Recent Review StatusConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (8)
- deque/deque.mbt (4 hunks)
- hashmap/hashmap.mbt (1 hunks)
- immutable_set/immutable_set.mbt (4 hunks)
- list/list.mbt (8 hunks)
- priority_queue/priority_queue.mbt (1 hunks)
- queue/queue.mbt (2 hunks)
- stack/stack.mbt (2 hunks)
- vec/vec.mbt (9 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Additional comments not posted (30)
priority_queue/priority_queue.mbt (1)
110-110: The addition of the@alertannotation to thepop_exnfunction documentation is a good practice for making the potential panic behavior explicit. This aligns well with the PR's objectives of enhancing documentation clarity and safety.queue/queue.mbt (2)
171-171: The addition of the@alertannotation to thepeek_exnfunction documentation is a positive change, making the potential panic behavior explicit. This enhances documentation clarity and safety.
216-216: Adding the@alertannotation to thepop_exnfunction documentation is a good practice, clearly indicating the potential for panic if the queue is empty. This contributes to the overall goal of enhancing documentation for safety.hashmap/hashmap.mbt (1)
43-43: The addition of the@alertannotation to thesetfunction documentation is a good practice for making the potential panic behavior explicit when the hash map is full. This aligns well with the PR's objectives of enhancing documentation clarity and safety.deque/deque.mbt (3)
186-186: The addition of the@alertannotation to thepop_front_exnfunction documentation is a positive change, making the potential panic behavior explicit. This enhances documentation clarity and safety.
202-202: Adding the@alertannotation to thepop_back_exnfunction documentation is a good practice, clearly indicating the potential for panic if the deque is empty. This contributes to the overall goal of enhancing documentation for safety.
274-274: The addition of the@alertannotation to theop_getmethod documentation is an excellent way to make the potential for panic explicit when the index is out of bounds. This aligns with the PR's objectives of enhancing documentation clarity and safety.stack/stack.mbt (2)
280-280: The addition of the@alert unsafeannotation to thepop_exnfunction is a good practice as it clearly documents the potential for a panic if the stack is empty. This enhances code safety and developer awareness.
392-392: Similarly, the@alert unsafeannotation on thepeek_exnfunction effectively communicates the risk of a panic when attempting to peek at an empty stack. This is a valuable addition to the documentation.list/list.mbt (8)
250-250: The@alert unsafeannotation on theheadfunction clearly indicates the risk of a panic when the list is empty. This is a crucial documentation update for enhancing code safety.
295-295: Adding the@alert unsafeannotation to thelastfunction is a good practice, as it warns developers about the potential for a panic if the list is empty. This improves code documentation and safety.
402-402: The@alert unsafeannotation on thezipfunction is important for indicating the risk of a panic when the two lists have different lengths. This enhances the clarity of potential issues for developers.
436-436: The addition of the@alert unsafeannotation to thenthfunction is beneficial for documenting the potential for a panic if the index is out of bounds. This is a valuable update for code safety.
585-585: The@alert unsafeannotation on themaximumfunction effectively communicates the risk of a panic when the list is empty. This documentation update is crucial for developer awareness.
607-607: Similarly, the@alert unsafeannotation on theminimumfunction clearly indicates the potential for a panic if the list is empty. This is an important documentation enhancement.
852-852: The@alert unsafeannotation added to thefindfunction is a good practice, as it warns developers about the risk of a panic if no element satisfies the provided condition. This improves code documentation.
906-906: Finally, the@alert unsafeannotation on thefindifunction clearly documents the potential for a panic if no element satisfies the condition with the given index. This is a valuable update for enhancing code safety.immutable_set/immutable_set.mbt (4)
89-89: The addition of the@alertannotation forremove_minis appropriate and clearly communicates the potential for a panic if theImmutableSetis empty. This enhances the documentation's clarity and safety awareness.
180-180: The@alertannotation for theminfunction is correctly added and effectively warns users about the unsafe behavior when theImmutableSetis empty. This is a good practice for improving code safety and documentation.
213-213: Adding the@alertannotation to themaxfunction is a good decision. It successfully alerts users to the potential panic when theImmutableSetis empty, aligning with the PR's objectives to enhance documentation and safety.
572-572: The@alertannotation for thefindfunction is well-placed and informative, warning users about the potential panic if the value is not found in theImmutableSet. This addition is consistent with the PR's goal of improving documentation and developer awareness of unsafe operations.vec/vec.mbt (9)
112-112: The addition of the@alertannotation forop_getis a good practice for indicating potential panics due to out-of-bounds access. This enhances code safety and developer awareness.
131-131: The@alertannotation forop_setfollows the same rationale asop_get, clearly documenting the risk of panicking when the index is out of bounds. This consistency in documentation is beneficial.
202-202: Adding an@alertannotation topop_exnto indicate it can panic if the vector is empty is a valuable update. It's important for developers to be aware of such conditions to avoid runtime errors.
254-254: The@alertannotation fordraineffectively communicates the risk of panicking due to invalid index ranges. This explicit documentation of unsafe behavior is crucial for maintaining robust code.
529-529: The@alertannotation forsplit_atis correctly added to warn about the potential panic when the index is out of bounds. This is another example of improving code safety through documentation.
724-724: The@alertannotation forswapis essential for indicating the risk of panicking due to invalid indices. This kind of documentation helps prevent errors by making the potential risks clear.
754-754: Including an@alertannotation forremoveto document the panic condition when the index is out of bounds is a prudent choice. It enhances the clarity and safety of the code.
807-807: The@alertannotation forresizeis important for indicating that the function can panic if a negative new length is provided. This helps in avoiding unintended misuse of the function.
838-838: The addition of the@alertannotation forinsertto document the potential for panicking with an out-of-bounds index is a good practice. It ensures that the documentation accurately reflects the function's behavior.
|
Alerts category (identifier after |
|
For some scenarios, we can use the alert message to provide useful suggestions: |
Good idea. So we first need to classify various error types. The situations that may cause panic now include index overflow, empty structure, full structure, and that no elements satisfies some predicate. But some cases I have difficulty finding shorter word/phrase to summarize. Should we open an issue/discussion? Also I found that some functions should not have panic behavior, I will consider modifying them in other pull request. |
|
per discussion with @bobzhang, the compiler should turn off |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #186 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 80.45% 80.45%
=======================================
Files 45 45
Lines 2047 2047
=======================================
Hits 1647 1647
Misses 400 400 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
I updated the discussion in #180 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- immutable_set/immutable_set.mbt (3 hunks)
- vec/vec.mbt (9 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- immutable_set/immutable_set.mbt
- vec/vec.mbt
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit