Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JACK buffer size fix. #11121
JACK buffer size fix. #11121
Changes from 14 commits
c2b1af8
82c7f71
fefbfd2
cfeffa7
1451803
b1b14b1
8f97592
4c1eb24
e52de39
75d0e29
f1bc670
096089d
6d24c26
705e097
e15cda3
b48e06d
185a681
44fa755
32379a6
31ba28e
f49bf12
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess it's highly unlikely that this CO is used somewhere in mappings or skins - and therefore can be removed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wanted to mention that it also needs to be removed from the Mixxx Controls section in the manual, but that CO does not seem to be documented anyway. 🤷
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Didn't we have an abstraction for sample and frame related time calculations?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not aware of something for this special case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I understand that for rate syncing with the frequency of the network clock
framesPerBuffer
is enough. But to show the visual waveform, not only rate, but also latency is needed.I don't understand this calculation. Shouldn't the waveform be in sync with the sound that the DJ hears (headphones or booth speakers) even if he's broadcasting a network stream?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this case the latency of the main DAC is lost. It would be an extra feature to compensate this.
This calculation is only to compensate the jitter that happens due to the different cycles of the audio and video thread.
At least this is unrelated to this PR. Do we want to file a bug for that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, please create a bug for this. It would be great, if you could add some pointers to this report, how a possible fix could look like.
I agree, that this is not related to this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here it is: #11219