Skip to content

Conversation

@WenqingLan1
Copy link
Contributor

@WenqingLan1 WenqingLan1 commented Sep 8, 2025

Added sm_103 arch for executables with cuda arch dependency.
Removed duplicate installation of hpc-x and nccl in cuda12.9.dockerfile and cuda12.8.dockerfile

@WenqingLan1 WenqingLan1 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 8, 2025 21:58
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 8, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.97%. Comparing base (60189dd) to head (bb389ad).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #737   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.97%   85.97%           
=======================================
  Files         102      102           
  Lines        7579     7579           
=======================================
  Hits         6516     6516           
  Misses       1063     1063           
Flag Coverage Δ
cpu-python3.12-unit-test 71.05% <ø> (ø)
cuda-unit-test 83.87% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

RUN echo PATH="$PATH" > /etc/environment && \
echo LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$LD_LIBRARY_PATH" >> /etc/environment && \
echo SB_MICRO_PATH="$SB_MICRO_PATH" >> /etc/environment && \
echo "source /opt/hpcx/hpcx-init.sh && hpcx_load" | tee -a /etc/bash.bashrc >> /etc/profile.d/10-hpcx.sh
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't need to call hpcx_load proactively?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if no custom hpc-x installed we can just remove hpcx_load, but for cuda13.0 I see Dilip installed a custom hpc-x version so might need to wait later to see how to cope with both situations.

ifeq ($(shell echo $(CUDA_VER)">=12.8" | bc -l), 1)
ifeq ($(shell echo $(CUDA_VER)">=12.9" | bc -l), 1)
# Get commit 87048bd from msscl to support updated nccl and sm_100
$(eval ARCHS := 100 103)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks there are some duplicated changes with [#739]

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes. I'm assuming we will merge cuda13.0 [#739] first. I will take care of the code merge later here.

@guoshzhao guoshzhao added enhancement New feature or request containers SuperBench Containers labels Sep 19, 2025
@guoshzhao guoshzhao changed the title Add sm_103 support for cuda12.9 docker image Dockerfile - add sm_103 support for cuda12.9 docker image Sep 19, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@polarG polarG left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@guoshzhao guoshzhao mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2025
30 tasks
@WenqingLan1 WenqingLan1 closed this Oct 8, 2025
@WenqingLan1 WenqingLan1 deleted the wenqinglan/sb-run-validation branch October 8, 2025 00:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

containers SuperBench Containers enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants