Re-phrase making-accessories to be more direct #205
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The "Making Accessories" page suffers from a case of the waffles;
makes accessory design easy
- not really! 😆Many micro:bit accessories
- how many?are designed to use an edge connector
- What proportion that were "designed to" use the edge connector actually successfully pull it off?I have attempted to reword this page to be more direct, making truthful statements that are useful to a PCB designer and avoiding unquantifiable, fluffy statements.
One key thing that's missing from documentation around the Edge Connector (unless I missed it) is any direct link to a suitable connector part. Is there a particular reason why the Foundation is not linking to suppliers? Is there a preferred supplier that could be linked to?
Hosting and linking to a datasheet for a compatible part might be a good compromise if all else fails. EG: Here's 4ucon's connector I found on Coolcomponents - http://www.4uconnector.com/online/object/4udrawing/10156.pdf