Improve TypedTasks

[sebastianvarela]

PR's key points

• Remove Rx!
• Improve payload of each task by sending it on success

How to review this PR?

…

[ThorBot]

	1 Warning
⚠️	Big PR, try to keep changes smaller if you can 😜

	4 Messages
📖	⌛️ [output] Slowest test: test_success_task_with_expiration_setted took 3.011 seconds
📖	⌛️ [iOS] Slowest test: test_success_task_with_expiration_setted took 3.005 seconds
📖	⌛️ [mac] Slowest test: test_success_task_with_expiration_setted took 3.006 seconds
📖	⌛️ [tv] Slowest test: test_success_task_with_expiration_setted took 3.007 seconds

Generated by 🚫 Danger

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 65.19% and project coverage change: +0.14 🎉

Comparison is base (9e30f27) 62.12% compared to head (71f1a4e) 62.27%.

❗ Current head 71f1a4e differs from pull request most recent head 1bcdbc0. Consider uploading reports for the commit 1bcdbc0 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master       #5      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   62.12%   62.27%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files          23       27       +4     
  Lines         697      766      +69     
==========================================
+ Hits          433      477      +44     
- Misses        264      289      +25     

Flag	Coverage Δ
ios	62.27% <65.19%> (+0.14%)	⬆️
mac	62.01% <65.19%> (-0.12%)	⬇️
tv	62.01% <65.19%> (-0.12%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
Sources/ActionReducer.swift	100.00% <ø> (ø)
Sources/StateType.swift	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ces/Utils/Foundation/DispatchQueueExtensions.swift	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...urces/Utils/RxSwift/ObservableTypeExtensions.swift	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...tils/RxSwift/PrimitiveSequenceTypeExtensions.swift	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
Sources/Utils/OrderedSet.swift	64.86% <37.50%> (ø)
Tests/Helpers/TestActions.swift	37.50% <37.50%> (ø)
Sources/Dispatcher.swift	72.03% <56.75%> (ø)
Sources/Store.swift	80.00% <71.42%> (ø)
Sources/Utils/Combine/DemandBuffer.swift	75.00% <75.00%> (ø)
... and 17 more

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.