fix: strategic review — root cause analysis with dedup#2339
Conversation
…isting work For each finding, the review now asks 'why did the framework allow this?' and traces back to missing automation, broken hooks, or prompt gaps. Before filing a self-improvement issue, searches existing open issues and TODO.md to avoid duplicating work that already addresses the root cause. References existing items in the report instead of creating duplicates.
|
Warning You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again! |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Thu Feb 26 00:48:05 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
|
🤖 Augment PR SummarySummary: Extends the strategic review guidance to require root-cause analysis for each finding and to route systemic “self-improvement” work to the aidevops tooling repo. 🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎 |
![augmentcode[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1027498?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| - "Cancelled tasks still `[ ]` in TODO.md" → is there no automation that syncs cancellation from issue labels back to TODO.md? | ||
|
|
||
| **Before creating a self-improvement issue:** | ||
| 1. Search existing open issues: `gh issue list --repo <repo> --state open --json number,title --jq '.[] | select(.title | test("<keywords>"))'` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The dedup steps reference --repo <repo> and a local TODO.md, but the next paragraph says self-improvement issues always live in aidevops; if run from a product repo this could miss existing tooling work and still create duplicates. It may be worth clarifying which repo’s issues/TODO.md should be searched for dedup.
Severity: low
🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎, or 🚀 if it prevented an incident/outage.
…isting work (#2339) For each finding, the review now asks 'why did the framework allow this?' and traces back to missing automation, broken hooks, or prompt gaps. Before filing a self-improvement issue, searches existing open issues and TODO.md to avoid duplicating work that already addresses the root cause. References existing items in the report instead of creating duplicates.
1 participant
Summary
Follow-up to #2333 and #2336.