fix: t1340 strategic review — cross-repo, action/TODO split, concurrency#2336
Conversation
…urrency awareness Three refinements from live testing of the opus strategic review (t1340): 1. Cross-repo: read pulse-repos.json and iterate ALL managed repos, not just aidevops. Product repos flagged as higher priority. Caught awardsapp #183 (parent open, all subtasks done) that the first version missed entirely. 2. Action/TODO split: act directly on safe mechanical things (prune, merge green PRs, file issues), create TODOs for state changes that need verification (marking tasks complete, unblocking chains). 3. Concurrency: treat worker count as informational, not a hard limit. Only flag if there's evidence of harm (rate limits, OOM, timeouts).
|
Warning You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again! |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Thu Feb 26 00:40:56 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
|
🤖 Augment PR SummarySummary: Refines the opus-tier strategic review procedure based on live testing to reduce missed work and unsafe state edits.
🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎 |
![augmentcode[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1027498?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
|
||
| # Active worktrees | ||
| ```bash | ||
| # Active worktrees (all repos share the worktree namespace) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
git worktree list is scoped to the current Git repository, so the note that “all repos share the worktree namespace” seems incorrect and could cause the review to miss stale worktrees in other repos.
Severity: medium
🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎, or 🚀 if it prevented an incident/outage.
|
|
||
| 2. **Clean stale worktrees** — run `git worktree prune` and identify worktree directories that can be removed (merged PRs, closed branches). List them but do NOT remove directories without confirming the branch is fully merged. | ||
| 1. **`git worktree prune`** — safe, only removes worktrees whose directories are already gone. | ||
| 2. **Merge CI-green PRs with approved reviews** — `gh pr merge --squash`. Same as the pulse does. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
gh pr merge --squash without a PR identifier or --repo can end up acting on the current-branch PR (or fail), which seems risky given the new cross-repo workflow described above.
Severity: medium
🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎, or 🚀 if it prevented an incident/outage.
…urrency awareness (#2336) Three refinements from live testing of the opus strategic review (t1340): 1. Cross-repo: read pulse-repos.json and iterate ALL managed repos, not just aidevops. Product repos flagged as higher priority. Caught awardsapp #183 (parent open, all subtasks done) that the first version missed entirely. 2. Action/TODO split: act directly on safe mechanical things (prune, merge green PRs, file issues), create TODOs for state changes that need verification (marking tasks complete, unblocking chains). 3. Concurrency: treat worker count as informational, not a hard limit. Only flag if there's evidence of harm (rate limits, OOM, timeouts).
1 participant
Summary
Three refinements from live-testing the opus strategic review with the user:
pulse-repos.json, iterates ALL managed repos (not just aidevops). Product repos flagged higher priority. This caught awardsapp feat: add ClawdHub skill registry as import source #183 (parent open, all 8 subtasks done) that v1 missed entirely.Follow-up to #2333 (merged before refinements landed).