Skip to content

Conversation

@skberkeley
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves #607
Rather than specifying a single output file as requested, I decided to allow specifying a directory instead, since lute transform can take any number of files to be transformed.

@skberkeley skberkeley self-assigned this Nov 21, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@annieetang annieetang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this creating the output file as the same name as the original file? do you think we could add an option to specify the specific output file name as well? in case users want to specify the file name differently too

@skberkeley
Copy link
Contributor Author

is this creating the output file as the same name as the original file? do you think we could add an option to specify the specific output file name as well? in case users want to specify the file name differently too

I considered it, but lute transform can take in any number of input files, so I opted to just keep the original base file names instead

Copy link
Contributor

@annieetang annieetang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, but I'd defer to maybe @hgoldstein for a check to see if it works with the external ask?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

lute transform should have an --output flag

3 participants