-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
[RISCV] Remove -riscv-asm-relax-branches flag #142855
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
lenary
wants to merge
1
commit into
llvm:main
Choose a base branch
from
lenary:pr/riscv-remove-relax-branch-option
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This flag has been superseded by `.option exact`, as the test updates show. Given the flag was always hidden, it makes sense to me to remove it, and move tests that required it to use `.option exact`.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mc @llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v Author: Sam Elliott (lenary) ChangesThis flag has been superseded by Given the flag was always hidden, it makes sense to me to remove it, and move tests that required it to use Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142855.diff 5 Files Affected:
diff --git a/lld/test/ELF/riscv-branch.s b/lld/test/ELF/riscv-branch.s
index 1a2b446b5a43b..5f73fd19f9aa3 100644
--- a/lld/test/ELF/riscv-branch.s
+++ b/lld/test/ELF/riscv-branch.s
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# REQUIRES: riscv
-# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=riscv32-unknown-elf -mattr=-relax -riscv-asm-relax-branches=0 %s -o %t.rv32.o
-# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=riscv64-unknown-elf -mattr=-relax -riscv-asm-relax-branches=0 %s -o %t.rv64.o
+# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=riscv32-unknown-elf %s -o %t.rv32.o
+# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=riscv64-unknown-elf %s -o %t.rv64.o
# RUN: ld.lld %t.rv32.o --defsym foo=_start+4 --defsym bar=_start -o %t.rv32
# RUN: ld.lld %t.rv64.o --defsym foo=_start+4 --defsym bar=_start -o %t.rv64
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
# RUN: not ld.lld %t.rv64.o --defsym foo=_start+1 --defsym bar=_start-1 -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-ALIGN %s
# ERROR-ALIGN: improper alignment for relocation R_RISCV_BRANCH: 0x1 is not aligned to 2 bytes
+.option exact
+
.global _start
_start:
beq x0, x0, foo
diff --git a/lld/test/ELF/riscv-undefined-weak.s b/lld/test/ELF/riscv-undefined-weak.s
index 57841127792ff..c89ac1fe10226 100644
--- a/lld/test/ELF/riscv-undefined-weak.s
+++ b/lld/test/ELF/riscv-undefined-weak.s
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# REQUIRES: riscv
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=riscv64 /dev/null -o %t2.o
# RUN: ld.lld -shared -soname=t2 %t2.o -o %t2.so
-# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=riscv64 -riscv-asm-relax-branches=0 %s -o %t.o
+# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=riscv64 %s -o %t.o
# RUN: llvm-readobj -r %t.o | FileCheck --check-prefix=RELOC %s
# RUN: ld.lld -e absolute %t.o -o %t
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
# RUN: llvm-objdump -d --no-show-raw-insn %t | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECK,PLT %s
# RUN: llvm-readelf -x .data %t | FileCheck --check-prefixes=HEX,HEX-WITH-PLT %s
+.option exact
+
.weak target
.global absolute, relative, branch
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/MCTargetDesc/RISCVAsmBackend.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/MCTargetDesc/RISCVAsmBackend.cpp
index 424c3fe5f829f..6a42e646b3f22 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/MCTargetDesc/RISCVAsmBackend.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/MCTargetDesc/RISCVAsmBackend.cpp
@@ -27,8 +27,6 @@
using namespace llvm;
-static cl::opt<bool> RelaxBranches("riscv-asm-relax-branches", cl::init(true),
- cl::Hidden);
// Temporary workaround for old linkers that do not support ULEB128 relocations,
// which are abused by DWARF v5 DW_LLE_offset_pair/DW_RLE_offset_pair
// implemented in Clang/LLVM.
@@ -110,9 +108,6 @@ bool RISCVAsmBackend::fixupNeedsRelaxationAdvanced(const MCFixup &Fixup,
const MCValue &,
uint64_t Value,
bool Resolved) const {
- if (!RelaxBranches)
- return false;
-
int64_t Offset = int64_t(Value);
unsigned Kind = Fixup.getTargetKind();
diff --git a/llvm/test/ExecutionEngine/JITLink/RISCV/ELF_branch.s b/llvm/test/ExecutionEngine/JITLink/RISCV/ELF_branch.s
index 29d3c5906d200..5d3a048ae69c6 100644
--- a/llvm/test/ExecutionEngine/JITLink/RISCV/ELF_branch.s
+++ b/llvm/test/ExecutionEngine/JITLink/RISCV/ELF_branch.s
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# RUN: rm -rf %t && mkdir -p %t
-# RUN: llvm-mc -triple=riscv64 -filetype=obj -riscv-asm-relax-branches=0 \
+# RUN: llvm-mc -triple=riscv64 -filetype=obj \
# RUN: -o %t/elf_riscv64_branch.o %s
-# RUN: llvm-mc -triple=riscv32 -filetype=obj -riscv-asm-relax-branches=0 \
+# RUN: llvm-mc -triple=riscv32 -filetype=obj \
# RUN: -o %t/elf_riscv32_branch.o %s
# RUN: llvm-jitlink -noexec \
# RUN: -slab-allocate 100Kb -slab-address 0xfff00ff4 -slab-page-size 4096 \
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
# RUN: -check %s %t/elf_riscv32_branch.o
#
+ .option exact
+
.text
# Empty main entry point.
.globl main
diff --git a/llvm/test/MC/RISCV/long-jump-disable-relax.s b/llvm/test/MC/RISCV/option-exact-long-jump-disable.s
similarity index 86%
rename from llvm/test/MC/RISCV/long-jump-disable-relax.s
rename to llvm/test/MC/RISCV/option-exact-long-jump-disable.s
index 815c2dfcec07a..6e4b5fdd31e17 100644
--- a/llvm/test/MC/RISCV/long-jump-disable-relax.s
+++ b/llvm/test/MC/RISCV/option-exact-long-jump-disable.s
@@ -1,14 +1,16 @@
-## Test that long branches are not relaxed with -riscv-asm-relax-branches=0
+## Test that long branches are not relaxed with .option exact
# RUN: split-file %s %t
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=riscv64 -mattr=+c \
-# RUN: -riscv-asm-relax-branches=0 %t/pass.s \
+# RUN: %t/pass.s \
# RUN: | llvm-objdump -dr -M no-aliases - \
# RUN: | FileCheck %t/pass.s
# RUN: not llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=riscv64 -mattr=+c -o /dev/null \
-# RUN: -riscv-asm-relax-branches=0 %t/fail.s 2>&1 \
+# RUN: %t/fail.s 2>&1 \
# RUN: | FileCheck %t/fail.s
#--- pass.s
+ .option exact
+
.text
test_undefined:
## Branches to undefined symbols should not be relaxed
@@ -33,6 +35,8 @@ test_defined_in_range:
bar:
#--- fail.s
+ .option exact
+
.text
## Branches to defined out-of-range symbols should report an error
test_defined_out_of_range:
|
lenary
added a commit
to lenary/eld
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2025
This is being removed from LLVM, as the same functionality is available using `.option exact`, and llvm/llvm-project#142855 makes the same change to this test.
lenary
added a commit
to lenary/eld
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2025
This is being removed from LLVM, as the same functionality is available using `.option exact`, and llvm/llvm-project#142855 makes the same change to this test. Signed-off-by: Sam Elliott <quic_aelliott@quicinc.com>
MaskRay
approved these changes
Jun 5, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This flag has been superseded by
.option exact
, as the test updates show.Given the flag was always hidden, it makes sense to me to remove it, and move tests that required it to use
.option exact
.