This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 23, 2020. It is now read-only.
Merge pull request #1 from llvm-mirror/master #8
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Merge from mirror
Merge from llvm-mirror
|
Sorry this was a mistake... |
llvm-mirror
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2015
…airs.
Store instructions do not modify register values and therefore it's safe
to form a store pair even if the source register has been read in between
the two store instructions.
Previously, the read of w1 (see below) prevented the formation of a stp.
str w0, [x2]
ldr w8, [x2, #8]
add w0, w8, w1
str w1, [x2, #4]
ret
We now generate the following code.
stp w0, w1, [x2]
ldr w8, [x2, #8]
add w0, w8, w1
ret
All correctness tests with -Ofast on A57 with Spec200x and EEMBC pass.
Performance results for SPEC2K were within noise.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@239432 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2015
These are really immediate DUPs, and suffer from the same problem
with long instructions with a high/2 variant (e.g. smull).
By extending a MOVI (or DUP, before this patch), we can avoid an ext
on the other operand of the long instruction, e.g. turning:
ext.16b v0, v0, v0, #8
movi.4h v1, #0x53
smull.4s v0, v0, v1
into:
movi.8h v1, #0x53
smull2.4s v0, v0, v1
While there, add a now-necessary combine to fold (VT NVCAST (VT x)).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@239799 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2015
In vectorized add reduction code, the final "reduce" step is sub-optimal. This change wll combine : ext v1.16b, v0.16b, v0.16b, #8 add v0.4s, v1.4s, v0.4s dup v1.4s, v0.s[1] add v0.4s, v1.4s, v0.4s into addv s0, v0.4s PR21371 http://reviews.llvm.org/D12325 Patch by Jun Bum Lim <junbuml@codeaurora.org>! git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@246790 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2016
The current behavior is incorrect, as the two CCs returned by changeFPCCToAArch64CC, intended to be OR'ed, are instead used in an AND ccmp chain. Consider: define i32 @t(float %a, float %b, float %c, float %d, i32 %e, i32 %f) { %cc1 = fcmp one float %a, %b %cc2 = fcmp olt float %c, %d %and = and i1 %cc1, %cc2 %r = select i1 %and, i32 %e, i32 %f ret i32 %r } Assuming (%a < %b) and (%c < %d); we used to do: fcmp s0, s1 # nzcv <- 1000 orr w8, wzr, #0x1 # w8 <- 1 csel w9, w8, wzr, mi # w9 <- 1 csel w8, w8, w9, gt # w8 <- 1 fcmp s2, s3 # nzcv <- 1000 cset w9, mi # w9 <- 1 tst w8, w9 # (w8 & w9) == 1, so: nzcv <- 0000 csel w0, w0, w1, ne # w0 <- w0 We now do: fcmp s2, s3 # nzcv <- 1000 fccmp s0, s1, #0, mi # mi, so: nzcv <- 1000 fccmp s0, s1, #8, le # !le, so: nzcv <- 1000 csel w0, w0, w1, pl # !pl, so: w0 <- w1 In other words, we transformed: (c < d) && ((a < b) || (a > b)) into: (c < d) && (a u>= b) && (a u<= b) whereas, per De Morgan's, we wanted: (c < d) && !((a u>= b) && (a u<= b)) Note that this problem doesn't occur in the test-suite. changeFPCCToAArch64CC produces disjunct CCs; here, one -> mi/gt. We can't represent that in the fccmp chain; it can't express arbitrary OR sequences, as one comment explains: In general we can create code for arbitrary "... (and (and A B) C)" sequences. We can also implement some "or" expressions, because "(or A B)" is equivalent to "not (and (not A) (not B))" and we can implement some negation operations. [...] However there is no way to negate the result of a partial sequence. Instead, introduce changeFPCCToANDAArch64CC, which produces the conjunct cond codes: - (a one b) == ((a olt b) || (a ogt b)) == ((a ord b) && (a une b)) - (a ueq b) == ((a uno b) || (a oeq b)) == ((a ule b) && (a uge b)) Note that, at first, one might think that, when PushNegate is true, we should use the disjunct CCs, in effect doing: (a || b) = !(!a && !(b)) = !(!a && !(b1 || b2)) <- changeFPCCToAArch64CC(b, b1, b2) = !(!a && !b1 && !b2) However, we can take advantage of the fact that the CC is already negated, which lets us avoid special-casing PushNegate and doing the simpler to reason about: (a || b) = !(!a && (!b)) = !(!a && (b1 && b2)) <- changeFPCCToANDAArch64CC(!b, b1, b2) = !(!a && b1 && b2) This makes both emitConditionalCompare cases behave identically, and produces correct ccmp sequences for the 2-CC fcmps. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@258533 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2016
Summary: This change merges adjacent 32 bit zero stores into a 64 bit zero store. e.g., str wzr, [x0] str wzr, [x0, #4] becomes str xzr, [x0] Therefore, four adjacent 32 bit zero stores will be a single stp. e.g., str wzr, [x0] str wzr, [x0, #4] str wzr, [x0, #8] str wzr, [x0, #12] becomes stp xzr, xzr, [x0] Reviewers: mcrosier, jmolloy, gberry, t.p.northover Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, mcrosier, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16933 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@260682 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 4, 2016
Summary: This reverts commit d88cc08. #0 0xfed467 in llvm::ARMFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves(llvm::MachineFunction&, llvm::BitVector&, llvm::RegScavenger*) const /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMFrameLowering.cpp:1625:52 #1 0x330d4cc in (anonymous namespace)::PEI::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/PrologEpilogInserter.cpp:186:3 #2 0x3193e12 in llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.cpp:60:13 #3 0x396237d in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1526:23 #4 0x3962a23 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1547:16 #5 0x3963d52 in runOnModule /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1603:23 #6 0x3963d52 in llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1706 #7 0x6bb910 in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:412:5 #8 0x6b3c25 in main /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:218:22 #9 0x7fd4a7d37ec4 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21ec4) #10 0x625c93 in _start (/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/llc+0x625c93) Reviewers: Subscribers: git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@268536 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 14, 2016
What happened here is that in the new PM there is a bunch of new copying
(actually, moving) and so this reads the HasProfileData member in
situations where it used to not be read.
It used to only be read strictly in the "runOnFunction" method and its
callees, where is *is* initialized (even after my patch).
So this ends up being benign as far as functional behavior of the
compiler (since we set HasProfileData in the "runImpl" method before we
ever make decisions based on it).
It's awesome that UBSan caught this. It highlights one more thing to
watch out for when porting passes.
Sanitizer bot log was:
-- Testing: 17049 tests, 32 threads --
Testing: 0 .. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80..
FAIL: LLVM :: Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-loads.ll (15184 of 17049)
******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-loads.ll' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/./bin/opt < /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-loads.ll -jump-threading -S | /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/./bin/FileCheck /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-loads.ll
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/./bin/opt < /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-loads.ll -passes=jump-threading -S | /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/./bin/FileCheck /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-loads.ll
--
Exit Code: 2
Command Output (stderr):
--
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.h:90:57: runtime error: load of value 136, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'
#0 0x2c33ba1 in llvm::JumpThreadingPass::JumpThreadingPass(llvm::JumpThreadingPass&&) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.h:90:57
#1 0x2bc88e4 in void llvm::PassManager<llvm::Function>::addPass<llvm::JumpThreadingPass>(llvm::JumpThreadingPass) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:282:40
#2 0x2bb2682 in llvm::PassBuilder::parseFunctionPassName(llvm::PassManager<llvm::Function>&, llvm::StringRef) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def:133:1
#3 0x2bb4914 in llvm::PassBuilder::parseFunctionPassPipeline(llvm::PassManager<llvm::Function>&, llvm::StringRef&, bool, bool) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilder.cpp:489:12
#4 0x2bb6f81 in llvm::PassBuilder::parsePassPipeline(llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module>&, llvm::StringRef, bool, bool) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilder.cpp:674:10
#5 0x986690 in llvm::runPassPipeline(llvm::StringRef, llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::Module&, llvm::TargetMachine*, llvm::tool_output_file*, llvm::StringRef, llvm::opt_tool::OutputKind, llvm::opt_tool::VerifierKind, bool, bool) /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/opt/NewPMDriver.cpp:85:8
#6 0x9af25e in main /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp:468:12
#7 0x7fd7e27dbf44 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21f44)
#8 0x960157 in _start (/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt+0x960157)
FileCheck error: '-' is empty.
FileCheck command line: /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/./bin/FileCheck /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-loads.ll
--
********************
Testing: 0 .. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90..
Testing Time: 128.90s
********************
Failing Tests (1):
LLVM :: Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-loads.ll
Expected Passes : 16725
Expected Failures : 129
Unsupported Tests : 194
Unexpected Failures: 1
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@272616 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2016
Reverse iterators to doubly-linked lists can be simpler (and cheaper)
than std::reverse_iterator. Make it so.
In particular, change ilist<T>::reverse_iterator so that it is *never*
invalidated unless the node it references is deleted. This matches the
guarantees of ilist<T>::iterator.
(Note: MachineBasicBlock::iterator is *not* an ilist iterator, but a
MachineInstrBundleIterator<MachineInstr>. This commit does not change
MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator, but it does update
MachineBasicBlock::reverse_instr_iterator. See note at end of commit
message for details on bundle iterators.)
Given the list (with the Sentinel showing twice for simplicity):
[Sentinel] <-> A <-> B <-> [Sentinel]
the following is now true:
1. begin() represents A.
2. begin() holds the pointer for A.
3. end() represents [Sentinel].
4. end() holds the poitner for [Sentinel].
5. rbegin() represents B.
6. rbegin() holds the pointer for B.
7. rend() represents [Sentinel].
8. rend() holds the pointer for [Sentinel].
The changes are #6 and #8. Here are some properties from the old
scheme (which used std::reverse_iterator):
- rbegin() held the pointer for [Sentinel] and rend() held the pointer
for A;
- operator*() cost two dereferences instead of one;
- converting from a valid iterator to its valid reverse_iterator
involved a confusing increment; and
- "RI++->erase()" left RI invalid. The unintuitive replacement was
"RI->erase(), RE = end()".
With vector-like data structures these properties are hard to avoid
(since past-the-beginning is not a valid pointer), and don't impose a
real cost (since there's still only one dereference, and all iterators
are invalidated on erase). But with lists, this was a poor design.
Specifically, the following code (which obviously works with normal
iterators) now works with ilist::reverse_iterator as well:
for (auto RI = L.rbegin(), RE = L.rend(); RI != RE;)
fooThatMightRemoveArgFromList(*RI++);
Converting between iterator and reverse_iterator for the same node uses
the getReverse() function.
reverse_iterator iterator::getReverse();
iterator reverse_iterator::getReverse();
Why doesn't iterator <=> reverse_iterator conversion use constructors?
In order to catch and update old code, reverse_iterator does not even
have an explicit conversion from iterator. It wouldn't be safe because
there would be no reasonable way to catch all the bugs from the changed
semantic (see the changes at call sites that are part of this patch).
Old code used this API:
std::reverse_iterator::reverse_iterator(iterator);
iterator std::reverse_iterator::base();
Here's how to update from old code to new (that incorporates the
semantic change), assuming I is an ilist<>::iterator and RI is an
ilist<>::reverse_iterator:
[Old] ==> [New]
reverse_iterator(I) (--I).getReverse()
reverse_iterator(I) ++I.getReverse()
--reverse_iterator(I) I.getReverse()
reverse_iterator(++I) I.getReverse()
RI.base() (--RI).getReverse()
RI.base() ++RI.getReverse()
--RI.base() RI.getReverse()
(++RI).base() RI.getReverse()
delete &*RI, RE = end() delete &*RI++
RI->erase(), RE = end() RI++->erase()
=======================================
Note: bundle iterators are out of scope
=======================================
MachineBasicBlock::iterator, also known as
MachineInstrBundleIterator<MachineInstr>, is a wrapper to represent
MachineInstr bundles. The idea is that each operator++ takes you to the
beginning of the next bundle. Implementing a sane reverse iterator for
this is harder than ilist. Here are the options:
- Use std::reverse_iterator<MBB::i>. Store a handle to the beginning of
the next bundle. A call to operator*() runs a loop (usually
operator--() will be called 1 time, for unbundled instructions).
Increment/decrement just works. This is the status quo.
- Store a handle to the final node in the bundle. A call to operator*()
still runs a loop, but it iterates one time fewer (usually
operator--() will be called 0 times, for unbundled instructions).
Increment/decrement just works.
- Make the ilist_sentinel<MachineInstr> *always* store that it's the
sentinel (instead of just in asserts mode). Then the bundle iterator
can sniff the sentinel bit in operator++().
I initially tried implementing the end() option as part of this commit,
but updating iterator/reverse_iterator conversion call sites was
error-prone. I have a WIP series of patches that implements the final
option.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@280032 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
nhaustov
pushed a commit
to nhaustov/llvm
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2016
Memory model fixes
bgamari
pushed a commit
to bgamari/llvm
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2016
Certain ARM instructions accept 32-bit immediate operands encoded as a 8-bit integer value (0-255) and a 4-bit rotation (0-30, even). Current ARM assembly syntax support in LLVM allows the decoded (32-bit) immediate to be specified as a single immediate operand for such instructions: mov r0, #4278190080 The ARMARM defines an extended assembly syntax allowing the encoding to be made more explicit, as in: mov r0, #255, llvm-mirror#8 ; (same 32-bit value as above) The behaviour of the two instructions can be different w.r.t flags, which is documented under "Modified immediate constants" in ARMARM. This patch enables support for this extended syntax at the MC layer. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223113 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
bgamari
pushed a commit
to bgamari/llvm
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2016
This frequently leads to cases like: ldr xD, [xN, :lo12:var] add xA, xN, :lo12:var ldr xD, [xA, llvm-mirror#8] where the ADD would have been needed anyway, and the two distinct addressing modes can prevent the formation of an ldp. Because of how we handle ADRP (aggressively forming an ADRP/ADD pseudo-inst at ISel time), this pattern also results in duplicated ADRP instructions (one on its own to cover the ldr, and one combined with the add). git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223172 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
bgamari
pushed a commit
to bgamari/llvm
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2016
No functional changes. Got myself bitten in r223113 when adding support for modified immediate syntax (regressions reported by joerg@britannica.bec.de, fixes in r223366 and r223381). Our assembler tests did not cover serveral different syntax variants. This patch expands the test coverage to check for the following cases: 1. Modified immediate operands may be expressed with expressions, as in #(4 * 2) instead of llvm-mirror#8. 2. Modified immediate operands may be _optionally_ prefixed by a '#' symbol or a '$' symbol. 3. Certain instructions (e.g. ADD) support single input register variants; [ADD r0, #mod_imm] is same as [ADD r0, r0, #mod_imm]. 4. Certain instructions have aliases which convert plain immediates to modified immediates. For an example, [ADD r0, -10] is not valid because -10 (in two's complement) cannot be encoded as a modified immediate, but ARMInstrInfo.td defines an alias which can transform this into a [SUB r0, 10]. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223475 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
bgamari
pushed a commit
to bgamari/llvm
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2016
…ndling into vector of loads,
and vectorizes it.
Test case :
float hadd(float* a) {
return (a[0] + a[1]) + (a[2] + a[3]);
}
AArch64 assembly before patch :
ldp s0, s1, [x0]
ldp s2, s3, [x0, llvm-mirror#8]
fadd s0, s0, s1
fadd s1, s2, s3
fadd s0, s0, s1
ret
AArch64 assembly after patch :
ldp d0, d1, [x0]
fadd v0.2s, v0.2s, v1.2s
faddp s0, v0.2s
ret
Reviewed Link : http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20141208/248531.html
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224119 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2017
#0 0x89cdeb in operator new[](unsigned long) /code/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:84:37 #1 0x4ec87c4 in llvm::RegisterBankInfo::ValueMapping const* llvm::RegisterBankInfo::getOperandsMapping<llvm::RegisterBankInfo::ValueMapping const* const*>(llvm::RegisterBankInfo::ValueMapping const* const*, llvm::RegisterBankInfo::ValueMapping const* const*) const /code/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/RegisterBankInfo.cpp:297:9 #2 0x9327ee in llvm::AArch64RegisterBankInfo::getInstrMapping(llvm::MachineInstr const&) const /code/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64RegisterBankInfo.cpp:540:30 #3 0x4eb8d07 in llvm::RegBankSelect::assignInstr(llvm::MachineInstr&) /code/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/RegBankSelect.cpp:546:24 #4 0x4eb9dd2 in llvm::RegBankSelect::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) /code/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/RegBankSelect.cpp:624:12 #5 0x3141875 in llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) /code/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.cpp:62:13 #6 0x396128d in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) /code/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1513:27 #7 0x3961832 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) /code/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1534:16 #8 0x3962540 in runOnModule /code/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1590:27 #9 0x3962540 in llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) /code/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1693 #10 0x8ae368 in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&) /code/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:562:8 #11 0x8a7a1b in main /code/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:316:22 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@293351 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
pxb1988
added a commit
to pxb1988/llvm
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2017
… on ConstantHoisting #0 0x0000000000dffa24 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) (/home/bob/projects/llvm-build/bin/llc+0xdffa24) llvm-mirror#1 0x0000000000dffcf6 SignalHandler(int) (/home/bob/projects/llvm-build/bin/llc+0xdffcf6) llvm-mirror#2 0x0000000000f0aa50 __restore_rt (/home/bob/projects/llvm-build/bin/llc+0xf0aa50) llvm-mirror#3 0x0000000000720cb3 (anonymous namespace)::AddressingModeMatcher::matchOperationAddr(llvm::User*, unsigned int, unsigned int, bool*) (/home/bob/projects/llvm-build/bin/llc+0x720cb3) llvm-mirror#4 0x0000000000720147 (anonymous namespace)::AddressingModeMatcher::matchAddr(llvm::Value*, unsigned int) (/home/bob/projects/llvm-build/bin/llc+0x720147) llvm-mirror#5 0x000000000071a34b (anonymous namespace)::CodeGenPrepare::optimizeMemoryInst(llvm::Instruction*, llvm::Value*, llvm::Type*, unsigned int) (/home/bob/projects/llvm-build/bin/llc+0x71a34b) llvm-mirror#6 0x0000000000714a07 (anonymous namespace)::CodeGenPrepare::optimizeInst(llvm::Instruction*, bool&) (/home/bob/projects/llvm-build/bin/llc+0x714a07) llvm-mirror#7 0x000000000070d15e (anonymous namespace)::CodeGenPrepare::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) (/home/bob/projects/llvm-build/bin/llc+0x70d15e) llvm-mirror#8 0x00000000009d78c3 llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) (/home/bob/projects/llvm-build/bin/llc+0x9d78c3) llvm-mirror#9 0x00000000009d7ab3 llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) (/home/bob/projects/llvm-build/bin/llc+0x9d7ab3) llvm-mirror#10 0x00000000009d7eba llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) (/home/bob/projects/llvm-build/bin/llc+0x9d7eba) llvm-mirror#11 0x000000000043de7a compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&) (/home/bob/projects/llvm-build/bin/llc+0x43de7a) llvm-mirror#12 0x000000000043b0eb main (/home/bob/projects/llvm-build/bin/llc+0x43b0eb) llvm-mirror#13 0x00000000011dee1d generic_start_main (/home/bob/projects/llvm-build/bin/llc+0x11dee1d) llvm-mirror#14 0x00000000011df08d __libc_start_main (/home/bob/projects/llvm-build/bin/llc+0x11df08d) llvm-mirror#15 0x000000000043a5ea _start (/home/bob/projects/llvm-build/bin/llc+0x43a5ea) Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: /home/bob/projects/llvm-build/bin/llc -O2 z.bc -march=thumb 1. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module 'z.bc'. 2. Running pass 'CodeGen Prepare' on function '@f' Segmentation fault (core dumped)
dtzWill
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2017
Summary: The code comments indicate that no effort has been spent on handling load/stores when the size isn't a multiple of the byte size correctly. However, the code only avoided types smaller than 8 bits. So for example a load of an i28 could still be considered as a candidate for vectorization. This patch adjusts the code to behave according to the code comment. The test case used to hit the following assert when trying to use "cast" an i32 to i28 using CreateBitOrPointerCast: opt: ../lib/IR/Instructions.cpp:2565: Assertion `castIsValid(op, S, Ty) && "Invalid cast!"' failed. #0 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) #1 SignalHandler(int) #2 __restore_rt #3 __GI_raise #4 __GI_abort #5 __GI___assert_fail #6 llvm::CastInst::Create(llvm::Instruction::CastOps, llvm::Value*, llvm::Type*, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::Instruction*) #7 llvm::IRBuilder<llvm::ConstantFolder, llvm::IRBuilderDefaultInserter>::CreateBitOrPointerCast(llvm::Value*, llvm::Type*, llvm::Twine const&) #8 (anonymous namespace)::Vectorizer::vectorizeLoadChain(llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Instruction*>, llvm::SmallPtrSet<llvm::Instruction*, 16u>*) Reviewers: arsenm Reviewed By: arsenm Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39295 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316663 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2017
Summary: We no longer add vectors of pointers as candidates for load/store vectorization. It does not seem to work anyway, but without this patch we can end up in asserts when trying to create casts between an integer type and the pointer of vectors type. The test case I've added used to assert like this when trying to cast between i64 and <2 x i16*>: opt: ../lib/IR/Instructions.cpp:2565: Assertion `castIsValid(op, S, Ty) && "Invalid cast!"' failed. #0 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) #1 SignalHandler(int) #2 __restore_rt #3 __GI_raise #4 __GI_abort #5 __GI___assert_fail #6 llvm::CastInst::Create(llvm::Instruction::CastOps, llvm::Value*, llvm::Type*, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::Instruction*) #7 llvm::IRBuilder<llvm::ConstantFolder, llvm::IRBuilderDefaultInserter>::CreateBitOrPointerCast(llvm::Value*, llvm::Type*, llvm::Twine const&) #8 Vectorizer::vectorizeStoreChain(llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Instruction*>, llvm::SmallPtrSet<llvm::Instruction*, 16u>*) Reviewers: arsenm Reviewed By: arsenm Subscribers: nhaehnle, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39296 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316665 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 28, 2017
Summary:
I have been getting rather difficult to reproduce SIGBUS crashes when
compiling certain FreeBSD sources, and their stack traces pointed
squarely at `SelectionDAG::salvageDebugInfo()`:
```
Core was generated by `/usr/obj/share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/bin/cc -cc1 -'.
Program terminated with signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
#0 isInvalidated () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SDNodeDbgValue.h:115
115 bool isInvalidated() const { return Invalid; }
(gdb) bt
#0 isInvalidated () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SDNodeDbgValue.h:115
#1 salvageDebugInfo () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp:7116
#2 0x00000000033b2516 in operator() () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp:3595
#3 __invoke<(lambda at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp:3593:59) &, llvm::SDNode *, llvm::SDNode *> () at /usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:4323
#4 __call<(lambda at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp:3593:59) &, llvm::SDNode *, llvm::SDNode *> () at /usr/include/c++/v1/__functional_base:349
#5 operator() () at /usr/include/c++/v1/functional:1562
#6 0x00000000033b0817 in operator() () at /usr/include/c++/v1/functional:1916
#7 NodeDeleted () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAG.h:293
#8 0x0000000003529dde in RemoveDeadNodes () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp:610
#9 0x00000000035556df in MorphNodeTo () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp:6794
#10 0x00000000033a9acc in MorphNode () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp:2594
#11 0x00000000033ac80b in SelectCodeCommon () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp:3601
#12 0x00000000023d464b in SelectCode () at /usr/obj/share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-tools/lib/clang/libllvm/X86GenDAGISel.inc:282902
#13 Select () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp:3072
#14 0x00000000033a5afa in DoInstructionSelection () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp:988
#15 0x00000000033a4e1a in CodeGenAndEmitDAG () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp:868
#16 0x00000000033a2643 in SelectAllBasicBlocks () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp:1624
#17 0x000000000339f158 in runOnMachineFunction () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp:466
#18 0x00000000023d03c4 in runOnMachineFunction () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp:175
#19 0x00000000035cc8c2 in runOnFunction () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.cpp:62
#20 0x00000000030dca9a in runOnFunction () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1520
#21 0x00000000030dccf3 in runOnModule () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1541
#22 0x00000000030dd228 in runOnModule () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1597
#23 run () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1700
#24 0x00000000014db578 in EmitAssembly () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp:815
#25 EmitBackendOutput () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp:1181
#26 0x00000000014d5b26 in HandleTranslationUnit () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenAction.cpp:292
#27 0x0000000001c4c332 in ParseAST () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Parse/ParseAST.cpp:159
#28 0x00000000015d546c in Execute () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:897
#29 0x0000000001cec311 in ExecuteAction () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:991
#30 0x00000000014b4f81 in ExecuteCompilerInvocation () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:252
#31 0x00000000014aa73f in cc1_main () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:221
#32 0x00000000014b2928 in ExecuteCC1Tool () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:309
#33 main () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:388
(gdb) frame 1
#1 salvageDebugInfo () at /share/dim/src/freebsd/clang600-import/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp:7116
7116 if (DV->isInvalidated())
(gdb) disassemble
Dump of assembler code for function salvageDebugInfo():
[...]
0x0000000003557348 <+744>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
0x0000000003557350 <+752>: mov (%r12),%r13
=> 0x0000000003557354 <+756>: cmpb $0x0,0x31(%r13)
0x0000000003557359 <+761>: jne 0x35573b0 <salvageDebugInfo()+848>
(gdb) info registers
[...]
r13 0x5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a 6510615555426900570
```
The `0x5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a` value in `r13` indicates the memory was either
uninitialized, or already freed.
Unfortunately I do not have a simple self-contained test case for this.
However, it seems pretty clear that the call to `AddDbgValue()` in
`salvageDebugInfo()` causes the problems, since it modifies
`SelectionDag::DbgInfo` while looping through one of its DenseMaps:
```
void SelectionDAG::salvageDebugInfo(SDNode &N) {
[...]
for (auto DV : GetDbgValues(&N)) {
if (DV->isInvalidated())
continue;
[...]
AddDbgValue(Clone, N0.getNode(), false);
[...]
}
}
```
At least, if I comment out the `AddDbgValue()` call, the crashes go
away. I propose to change this function slightly, similar to the
`SelectionDAG::transferDbgValues()` function just above it, to save the
cloned SDDbgValues in a separate SmallVector, and only call
AddDbgValue() on them after the for loop is done.
Reviewers: aprantl, bogner, bkramer, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: davide, krytarowski, JDevlieghere, emaste, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41589
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@321545 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2018
when a BUILD_VECTOR is created out of a sequence of EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT with a
specific pattern sequence, either <0, 2, 4, ...> or <1, 3, 5, ...>, replace the
BUILD_VECTOR with either vuzp1 or vuzp2.
With this patch LLVM generates the following code for the first function fun1 in the testcase:
adrp x8, .LCPI0_0
ldr q0, [x8, :lo12:.LCPI0_0]
tbl v0.16b, { v0.16b }, v0.16b
ext v1.16b, v0.16b, v0.16b, #8
uzp1 v0.8b, v0.8b, v1.8b
str d0, [x8]
ret
Without this patch LLVM currently generates this code:
adrp x8, .LCPI0_0
ldr q0, [x8, :lo12:.LCPI0_0]
tbl v0.16b, { v0.16b }, v0.16b
mov v1.16b, v0.16b
mov v1.b[1], v0.b[2]
mov v1.b[2], v0.b[4]
mov v1.b[3], v0.b[6]
mov v1.b[4], v0.b[8]
mov v1.b[5], v0.b[10]
mov v1.b[6], v0.b[12]
mov v1.b[7], v0.b[14]
str d1, [x8]
ret
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@326443 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2018
…d VPlan for tests." Memory leaks in tests. http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/builds/6289/steps/check-llvm%20asan/logs/stdio Direct leak of 192 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x554ea8 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:106 #1 0x56cef1 in llvm::VPlanTestBase::doAnalysis(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTestBase.h:53:14 #2 0x56bec4 in llvm::VPlanTestBase::buildHCFG(llvm::BasicBlock*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTestBase.h:57:3 #3 0x571f1e in llvm::(anonymous namespace)::VPlanHCFGTest_testVPInstructionToVPRecipesInner_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanHCFGTest.cpp:119:15 #4 0xed2291 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc #5 0xed44c8 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11 #6 0xed5890 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28 #7 0xef3634 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43 #8 0xef27e0 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc #9 0xebbc23 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46 #10 0xebbc23 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:51 #11 0x7f65569592e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0) and more. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@336718 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 14, 2018
…ering"
This reverts commit r337021.
WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0x1415cd65 in void write_signed<long>(llvm::raw_ostream&, long, unsigned long, llvm::IntegerStyle) /code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/NativeFormatting.cpp:95:7
#1 0x1415c900 in llvm::write_integer(llvm::raw_ostream&, long, unsigned long, llvm::IntegerStyle) /code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/NativeFormatting.cpp:121:3
#2 0x1472357f in llvm::raw_ostream::operator<<(long) /code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/raw_ostream.cpp:117:3
#3 0x13bb9d4 in llvm::raw_ostream::operator<<(int) /code/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h:210:18
#4 0x3c2bc18 in void printField<unsigned int, &(amd_kernel_code_s::amd_kernel_code_version_major)>(llvm::StringRef, amd_kernel_code_s const&, llvm::raw_ostream&) /code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/Utils/AMDKernelCodeTUtils.cpp:78:23
#5 0x3c250ba in llvm::printAmdKernelCodeField(amd_kernel_code_s const&, int, llvm::raw_ostream&) /code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/Utils/AMDKernelCodeTUtils.cpp:104:5
#6 0x3c27ca3 in llvm::dumpAmdKernelCode(amd_kernel_code_s const*, llvm::raw_ostream&, char const*) /code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/Utils/AMDKernelCodeTUtils.cpp:113:5
#7 0x3a46e6c in llvm::AMDGPUTargetAsmStreamer::EmitAMDKernelCodeT(amd_kernel_code_s const&) /code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/MCTargetDesc/AMDGPUTargetStreamer.cpp:161:3
#8 0xd371e4 in llvm::AMDGPUAsmPrinter::EmitFunctionBodyStart() /code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUAsmPrinter.cpp:204:26
[...]
Uninitialized value was created by an allocation of 'KernelCode' in the stack frame of function '_ZN4llvm16AMDGPUAsmPrinter21EmitFunctionBodyStartEv'
#0 0xd36650 in llvm::AMDGPUAsmPrinter::EmitFunctionBodyStart() /code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUAsmPrinter.cpp:192
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@337079 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 20, 2018
This reverts commit r337504 while I investigate a TSan bot failure that seems related: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-autoconf/builds/26526 #8 0x000055581f2895d8 (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-autoconf/build/tsan_debug_build/bin/clang-7+0x1eb45d8) #9 0x000055581f294323 llvm::ConstantAggrKeyType<llvm::ConstantArray>::create(llvm::ArrayType*) const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-autoconf/build/llvm/lib/IR/ConstantsContext.h:409:0 #10 0x000055581f294323 llvm::ConstantUniqueMap<llvm::ConstantArray>::create(llvm::ArrayType*, llvm::ConstantAggrKeyType<llvm::ConstantArray>, std::pair<unsigned int, std::pair<llvm::ArrayType*, llvm::ConstantAggrKeyType<llvm::ConstantArray> > >&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-autoconf/build/llvm/lib/IR/ConstantsContext.h:635:0 #11 0x000055581f294323 llvm::ConstantUniqueMap<llvm::ConstantArray>::getOrCreate(llvm::ArrayType*, llvm::ConstantAggrKeyType<llvm::ConstantArray>) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-autoconf/build/llvm/lib/IR/ConstantsContext.h:654:0 #12 0x000055581f2944cb llvm::ConstantArray::get(llvm::ArrayType*, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Constant*>) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-autoconf/build/llvm/lib/IR/Constants.cpp:964:0 #13 0x000055581fa27e19 llvm::SmallVectorBase::size() const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-autoconf/build/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:53:0 #14 0x000055581fa27e19 llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::Constant*>::resize(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-autoconf/build/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:347:0 #15 0x000055581fa27e19 (anonymous namespace)::EmitArrayConstant(clang::CodeGen::CodeGenModule&, clang::ConstantArrayType const*, llvm::Type*, unsigned int, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::Constant*>&, llvm::Constant*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-autoconf/build/llvm/tools/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp:669:0 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@337511 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2019
Introduces memory leak in FunctionTest.GetPointerAlignment that breaks sanitizer buildbots:
```
=================================================================
==2453==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 128 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105
#1 0x16936bc in llvm::User::operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/User.cpp:151:19
#2 0x7c3fe9 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:12
#3 0x7c3fe9 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136
#4 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
#5 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
#6 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
#7 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
#8 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
#9 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
#10 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
#11 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
#12 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
#13 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
Indirect leak of 40 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105
#1 0x151be6b in make_unique<llvm::ValueSymbolTable> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:1349:29
#2 0x151be6b in llvm::Function::Function(llvm::FunctionType*, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, unsigned int, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::Module*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/Function.cpp:241
#3 0x7c4006 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:16
#4 0x7c4006 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136
#5 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
#6 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
#7 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
#8 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
#9 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
#10 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
#11 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
#12 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
#13 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
#14 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 168 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
```
See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/builds/11358/steps/check-llvm%20asan/logs/stdio for more information.
Also introduces use-of-uninitialized-value in ConstantsTest.FoldGlobalVariablePtr:
```
==7070==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0x14e703c in User /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5
#1 0x14e703c in Constant /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Constant.h:44
#2 0x14e703c in llvm::GlobalValue::GlobalValue(llvm::Type*, llvm::Value::ValueTy, llvm::Use*, unsigned int, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Twine const&, unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalValue.h:78
#3 0x14e5467 in GlobalObject /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalObject.h:34:9
#4 0x14e5467 in llvm::GlobalVariable::GlobalVariable(llvm::Type*, bool, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Constant*, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::GlobalValue::ThreadLocalMode, unsigned int, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/Globals.cpp:314
#5 0x6938f1 in llvm::(anonymous namespace)::ConstantsTest_FoldGlobalVariablePtr_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantsTest.cpp:565:18
#6 0x1a240a1 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
#7 0x1a240a1 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
#8 0x1a26d26 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
#9 0x1a2815f in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
#10 0x1a43de8 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
#11 0x1a42c47 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
#12 0x1a42c47 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
#13 0x1a0dfba in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
#14 0x1a0dfba in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
#15 0x7f2081c412e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
#16 0x4dff49 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/unittests/IR/IRTests+0x4dff49)
SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5 in User
```
See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/30222/steps/check-llvm%20msan/logs/stdio for more information.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@355616 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dylanmckay
pushed a commit
to dylanmckay/llvm
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2019
Introduces memory leak in FunctionTest.GetPointerAlignment that breaks sanitizer buildbots:
```
=================================================================
==2453==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 128 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105
llvm-mirror#1 0x16936bc in llvm::User::operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/User.cpp:151:19
llvm-mirror#2 0x7c3fe9 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:12
llvm-mirror#3 0x7c3fe9 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136
llvm-mirror#4 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
llvm-mirror#5 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
llvm-mirror#6 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
llvm-mirror#7 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
llvm-mirror#8 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
llvm-mirror#9 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
llvm-mirror#10 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
llvm-mirror#11 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
llvm-mirror#12 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
llvm-mirror#13 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
Indirect leak of 40 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105
llvm-mirror#1 0x151be6b in make_unique<llvm::ValueSymbolTable> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:1349:29
llvm-mirror#2 0x151be6b in llvm::Function::Function(llvm::FunctionType*, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, unsigned int, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::Module*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/Function.cpp:241
llvm-mirror#3 0x7c4006 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:16
llvm-mirror#4 0x7c4006 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136
llvm-mirror#5 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
llvm-mirror#6 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
llvm-mirror#7 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
llvm-mirror#8 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
llvm-mirror#9 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
llvm-mirror#10 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
llvm-mirror#11 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
llvm-mirror#12 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
llvm-mirror#13 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
llvm-mirror#14 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 168 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
```
See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/builds/11358/steps/check-llvm%20asan/logs/stdio for more information.
Also introduces use-of-uninitialized-value in ConstantsTest.FoldGlobalVariablePtr:
```
==7070==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0x14e703c in User /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5
llvm-mirror#1 0x14e703c in Constant /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Constant.h:44
llvm-mirror#2 0x14e703c in llvm::GlobalValue::GlobalValue(llvm::Type*, llvm::Value::ValueTy, llvm::Use*, unsigned int, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Twine const&, unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalValue.h:78
llvm-mirror#3 0x14e5467 in GlobalObject /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalObject.h:34:9
llvm-mirror#4 0x14e5467 in llvm::GlobalVariable::GlobalVariable(llvm::Type*, bool, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Constant*, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::GlobalValue::ThreadLocalMode, unsigned int, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/Globals.cpp:314
llvm-mirror#5 0x6938f1 in llvm::(anonymous namespace)::ConstantsTest_FoldGlobalVariablePtr_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantsTest.cpp:565:18
llvm-mirror#6 0x1a240a1 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
llvm-mirror#7 0x1a240a1 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
llvm-mirror#8 0x1a26d26 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
llvm-mirror#9 0x1a2815f in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
llvm-mirror#10 0x1a43de8 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
llvm-mirror#11 0x1a42c47 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
llvm-mirror#12 0x1a42c47 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
llvm-mirror#13 0x1a0dfba in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
llvm-mirror#14 0x1a0dfba in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
llvm-mirror#15 0x7f2081c412e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
llvm-mirror#16 0x4dff49 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/unittests/IR/IRTests+0x4dff49)
SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5 in User
```
See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/30222/steps/check-llvm%20msan/logs/stdio for more information.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@355616 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2019
Looks like a MachinePipeliner algorithm problem found by
sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast.
I will backout this test first while investigating the problem to
unblock buildbot.
==49637==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address
0x614000002e08 at pc 0x000004364350 bp 0x7ffe228a3bd0 sp 0x7ffe228a3bc8
READ of size 4 at 0x614000002e08 thread T0
#0 0x436434f in
llvm::SwingSchedulerDAG::checkValidNodeOrder(llvm::SmallVector<llvm::NodeSet,
8u> const&) const
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:3736:11
#1 0x4342cd0 in llvm::SwingSchedulerDAG::schedule()
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:486:3
#2 0x434042d in
llvm::MachinePipeliner::swingModuloScheduler(llvm::MachineLoop&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:385:7
#3 0x433eb90 in
llvm::MachinePipeliner::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:207:5
#4 0x428b7ea in
llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.cpp:73:13
#5 0x4d1a913 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1648:27
#6 0x4d1b192 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1685:16
#7 0x4d1c06d in runOnModule
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1752:27
#8 0x4d1c06d in llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1865
#9 0xa48ca3 in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:611:8
#10 0xa4270f in main
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:365:22
#11 0x7fec902572e0 in __libc_start_main
(/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
#12 0x971b69 in _start
(/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan/bin/llc+0x971b69)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@363105 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dylanmckay
pushed a commit
to dylanmckay/llvm
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 12, 2019
Looks like a MachinePipeliner algorithm problem found by
sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast.
I will backout this test first while investigating the problem to
unblock buildbot.
==49637==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address
0x614000002e08 at pc 0x000004364350 bp 0x7ffe228a3bd0 sp 0x7ffe228a3bc8
READ of size 4 at 0x614000002e08 thread T0
#0 0x436434f in
llvm::SwingSchedulerDAG::checkValidNodeOrder(llvm::SmallVector<llvm::NodeSet,
8u> const&) const
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:3736:11
llvm-mirror#1 0x4342cd0 in llvm::SwingSchedulerDAG::schedule()
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:486:3
llvm-mirror#2 0x434042d in
llvm::MachinePipeliner::swingModuloScheduler(llvm::MachineLoop&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:385:7
llvm-mirror#3 0x433eb90 in
llvm::MachinePipeliner::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:207:5
llvm-mirror#4 0x428b7ea in
llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.cpp:73:13
llvm-mirror#5 0x4d1a913 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1648:27
llvm-mirror#6 0x4d1b192 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1685:16
llvm-mirror#7 0x4d1c06d in runOnModule
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1752:27
llvm-mirror#8 0x4d1c06d in llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1865
llvm-mirror#9 0xa48ca3 in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:611:8
llvm-mirror#10 0xa4270f in main
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:365:22
llvm-mirror#11 0x7fec902572e0 in __libc_start_main
(/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
llvm-mirror#12 0x971b69 in _start
(/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan/bin/llc+0x971b69)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@363105 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2019
…_GEP Before, we weren't able to select things like this for G_GEP: add x0, x8, #8 And instead we'd materialize the 8. This teaches GISel to do that. It gives some considerable code size savings on 252.eon-- about 4%! Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65248 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@366959 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2019
…ymbol that belongs to a section with a broken sh_name" It broke BB: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/builds/16955/steps/test/logs/stdio Expected<T> must be checked before access or destruction. Unchecked Expected<T> contained error: a section [index 1] has an invalid sh_name (0xffff) offset which goes past the end of the section name string tableStack dump: 0. Program arguments: /srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm /srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/test/tools/llvm-nm/Output/format-sysv-section.test.tmp2.o --format=sysv #0 0x00000000008af7c4 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x8af7c4) #1 0x00000000008ad8be llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x8ad8be) #2 0x00000000008afbd8 SignalHandler(int) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x8afbd8) #3 0x00007f0a6b989730 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x12730) #4 0x00007f0a6b48d7bb raise (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x377bb) #5 0x00007f0a6b478535 abort (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x22535) #6 0x000000000042004b llvm::Expected<llvm::StringRef>::fatalUncheckedExpected() const (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x42004b) #7 0x00000000008367f5 (/sv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x8367f5) #8 0x0000000000817b80 llvm::object::IRObjectFile::findBitcodeInObject(llvm::object::ObjectFile const&) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x817b80) #9 0x0000000000838416 llvm::object::SymbolicFile::createSymbolicFile(llvm::MemoryBufferRef, llvm::file_magic, llvm::LLVMContext*) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x838416) #10 0x00000000007f36cb llvm::object::createBinary(llvm::MemoryBufferRef, llvm::LLVMContext*) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x7f36cb) #11 0x0000000000413123 dumpSymbolNamesFromFile(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >&) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x413123) #12 0x0000000000412e38 main (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x412e38) #13 0x00007f0a6b47a09b __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2409b) #14 0x00000000004120da _start (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x4120da) FileCheck error: '-' is empty. FileCheck command line: /srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/FileCheck /srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.src/test/tools/llvm-nm/format-sysv-section.test --check-prefix=ERR -- git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@370662 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2019
Summary: This reverts commit r372204. This change causes build bot failures under msan: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/35236/steps/check-llvm%20msan/logs/stdio: ``` FAIL: LLVM :: DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir (19531 of 33579) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir' FAILED ******************** Script: -- : 'RUN: at line 1'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/llc -O0 -start-before=livedebugvalues -filetype=obj -o - /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/llvm-dwarfdump -v - | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir -- Exit Code: 2 Command Output (stderr): -- ==62894==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0xdfcafb in llvm::AArch64FrameLowering::resolveFrameOffsetReference(llvm::MachineFunction const&, int, bool, unsigned int&, bool, bool) const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64FrameLowering.cpp:1658:3 #1 0xdfae8a in resolveFrameIndexReference /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64FrameLowering.cpp:1580:10 #2 0xdfae8a in llvm::AArch64FrameLowering::getFrameIndexReference(llvm::MachineFunction const&, int, unsigned int&) const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64FrameLowering.cpp:1536 #3 0x46642c1 in (anonymous namespace)::LiveDebugValues::extractSpillBaseRegAndOffset(llvm::MachineInstr const&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:582:21 #4 0x4647cb3 in transferSpillOrRestoreInst /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:883:11 #5 0x4647cb3 in process /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:1079 #6 0x4647cb3 in (anonymous namespace)::LiveDebugValues::ExtendRanges(llvm::MachineFunction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:1361 #7 0x463ac0e in (anonymous namespace)::LiveDebugValues::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:1415:18 #8 0x4854ef0 in llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.cpp:73:13 #9 0x53b0b01 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1648:27 #10 0x53b15f6 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1685:16 #11 0x53b298d in runOnModule /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1750:27 #12 0x53b298d in llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1863 #13 0x905f21 in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:601:8 #14 0x8fdc4e in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:355:22 #15 0x7f67673632e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0) #16 0x882369 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/llc+0x882369) MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64FrameLowering.cpp:1658:3 in llvm::AArch64FrameLowering::resolveFrameOffsetReference(llvm::MachineFunction const&, int, bool, unsigned int&, bool, bool) const Exiting error: -: The file was not recognized as a valid object file FileCheck error: '-' is empty. FileCheck command line: /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir ``` Reviewers: bkramer Reviewed By: bkramer Subscribers: sdardis, aprantl, kristof.beyls, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67710 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@372228 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2019
This test is not defined.
FAIL: LLVM-Unit :: ADT/./ADTTests/ArrayRefTest.SizeTSizedOperations (178 of 33926)
******************** TEST 'LLVM-Unit :: ADT/./ADTTests/ArrayRefTest.SizeTSizedOperations' FAILED ********************
Note: Google Test filter = ArrayRefTest.SizeTSizedOperations
[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from ArrayRefTest
[ RUN ] ArrayRefTest.SizeTSizedOperations
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h:180:32: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 9223372036854775806 to null pointer
#0 0x5ae8dc in llvm::ArrayRef<char>::slice(unsigned long, unsigned long) const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h:180:32
#1 0x5ae44c in (anonymous namespace)::ArrayRefTest_SizeTSizedOperations_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/unittests/ADT/ArrayRefTest.cpp:85:3
#2 0x928a96 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474:5
#3 0x929793 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
#4 0x92a152 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
#5 0x9319d2 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
#6 0x931416 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257:10
#7 0x920ac3 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
#8 0x920ac3 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50:10
#9 0x7f66135b72e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
#10 0x472c19 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/unittests/ADT/ADTTests+0x472c19)
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h:180:32 in
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@374327 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Merge from mirror