Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 23, 2020. It is now read-only.

This fix solves error: "‘ptrdiff_t’ does not name a type" for me. #2

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

worldsayshi
Copy link

This seems to solve a build error that I get: "error: ‘ptrdiff_t’ does not name a type".

I assume ptrdiff_t has been recently moved from another std module or something of that ilk.

I could not find any specific reports related to llvm but for other cpp projects, like qt and openCV:
http://goo.gl/36taW

@dtzWill
Copy link
Member

dtzWill commented Nov 19, 2012

Hi @worldsayshi. This is only a mirror of the official llvm repository, and accordingly I cannot accept pull requests against this tree.

Please see the LLVM Developer Policy for information on submitting patches to LLVM. Patches accepted upstream will be reflected here on the next hourly update.

Best of luck :).

llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2012
std::string to a StringRef. Moreover, the method being called accepts
a Twine to simplify these patterns.

Fixes this ASan failure:
==6312== ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x7fd558b1af58 at pc 0xcb7529 bp 0x7fffff572080 sp 0x7fffff572078
READ of size 1 at 0x7fd558b1af58 thread T0
    #0 0xcb7528 .../llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h:192 llvm::StringRef::operator[]()
    #1 0x1d53c0a .../llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h:128 llvm::HashString()
    #2 0x1d53878 .../llvm/lib/Support/StringMap.cpp:64 llvm::StringMapImpl::LookupBucketFor()
    #3 0x1b6872f .../llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringMap.h:352 llvm::StringMap<>::GetOrCreateValue<>()
    #4 0x1b61836 .../llvm/lib/MC/MCContext.cpp:109 llvm::MCContext::GetOrCreateSymbol()
    #5 0xe9fd47 .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMELFStreamer.cpp:154 (anonymous namespace)::ARMELFStreamer::EmitMappingSymbol()
    #6 0xea01dd .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMELFStreamer.cpp:133 (anonymous namespace)::ARMELFStreamer::EmitDataMappingSymbol()
    #7 0xe9f78b .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMELFStreamer.cpp:91 (anonymous namespace)::ARMELFStreamer::EmitBytes()
    #8 0x1b15d82 .../llvm/lib/MC/MCStreamer.cpp:89 llvm::MCStreamer::EmitIntValue()
    #9 0xcc0f9b .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp:713 llvm::ARMAsmPrinter::emitAttributes()
    #10 0xcc0d44 .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp:632 llvm::ARMAsmPrinter::EmitStartOfAsmFile()
    #11 0x14692ad .../llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp:162 llvm::AsmPrinter::doInitialization()
    #12 0x1bc4677 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1561 llvm::FPPassManager::doInitialization()
    #13 0x1bc4990 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1595 llvm::MPPassManager::runOnModule()
    #14 0x1bc55e5 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1705 llvm::PassManagerImpl::run()
    #15 0x1bc5878 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1740 llvm::PassManager::run()
    #16 0xc3954d .../llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:378 compileModule()
    #17 0xc38001 .../llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:194 main
    #18 0x7fd557d6a11c __libc_start_main
0x7fd558b1af58 is located 24 bytes inside of 29-byte region [0x7fd558b1af40,0x7fd558b1af5d)
freed by thread T0 here:
    #0 0xc337da .../llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:56 operator delete()
    #1 0x1ee9cef .../libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h:535 std::string::~string()
    #2 0xea01dd .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMELFStreamer.cpp:133 (anonymous namespace)::ARMELFStreamer::EmitDataMappingSymbol()
    #3 0xe9f78b .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMELFStreamer.cpp:91 (anonymous namespace)::ARMELFStreamer::EmitBytes()
    #4 0x1b15d82 .../llvm/lib/MC/MCStreamer.cpp:89 llvm::MCStreamer::EmitIntValue()
    #5 0xcc0f9b .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp:713 llvm::ARMAsmPrinter::emitAttributes()
    #6 0xcc0d44 .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp:632 llvm::ARMAsmPrinter::EmitStartOfAsmFile()
    #7 0x14692ad .../llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp:162 llvm::AsmPrinter::doInitialization()
    #8 0x1bc4677 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1561 llvm::FPPassManager::doInitialization()
    #9 0x1bc4990 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1595 llvm::MPPassManager::runOnModule()
    #10 0x1bc55e5 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1705 llvm::PassManagerImpl::run()
    #11 0x1bc5878 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1740 llvm::PassManager::run()
    #12 0xc3954d .../llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:378 compileModule()
    #13 0xc38001 .../llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:194 main
    #14 0x7fd557d6a11c __libc_start_main

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169668 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2012
 ((x & 0xff00) >> 8) << 2
to
 (x >> 6) & 0x3fc

This is general goodness since it folds a left shift into the mask. However,
the trailing zeros in the mask prevents the ARM backend from using the bit
extraction instructions. And worse since the mask materialization may require
an addition instruction. This comes up fairly frequently when the result of 
the bit twiddling is used as memory address. e.g.

 = ptr[(x & 0xFF0000) >> 16]

We want to generate:
  ubfx   r3, r1, #16, #8
  ldr.w  r3, [r0, r3, lsl #2]

vs.
  mov.w  r9, #1020
  and.w  r2, r9, r1, lsr #14
  ldr    r2, [r0, r2]

Add a late ARM specific isel optimization to
ARMDAGToDAGISel::PreprocessISelDAG(). It folds the left shift to the
'base + offset' address computation; change the mask to one which doesn't have
trailing zeros and enable the use of ubfx.

Note the optimization has to be done late since it's target specific and we
don't want to change the DAG normalization. It's also fairly restrictive
as shifter operands are not always free. It's only done for lsh 1 / 2. It's
known to be free on some cpus and they are most common for address
computation.

This is a slight win for blowfish, rijndael, etc.

rdar://12870177


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@170581 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2012
* One that accepts a single Attribute::AttrKind.

* One that accepts an Attribute::AttrKind plus a list of values. This is for
  attributes defined like this:

    #1 = attributes { align = 4 }

* One that accepts a string, for target-specific attributes like this:

    #2 = attributes { "cpu=cortex-a8" }


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171249 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2013
…workaround for gcc-4.4 take #2.

I will investigate, later, what was wrong. I am too tired for now.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171611 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2013
Attribute references are of this form:

  define void @foo() #0 #1 #2 { ... }

Parse them for function attributes. If there's more than one reference, then
they are merged together.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@174697 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
swatanabe referenced this pull request in clangupc/llvm-upc Mar 12, 2013
subtarget CPU descriptions and support new features of
MachineScheduler.

MachineModel has three categories of data:
1) Basic properties for coarse grained instruction cost model.
2) Scheduler Read/Write resources for simple per-opcode and operand cost model (TBD).
3) Instruction itineraties for detailed per-cycle reservation tables.

These will all live side-by-side. Any subtarget can use any
combination of them. Instruction itineraries will not change in the
near term. In the long run, I expect them to only be relevant for
in-order VLIW machines that have complex contraints and require a
precise scheduling/bundling model. Once itineraries are only actively
used by VLIW-ish targets, they could be replaced by something more
appropriate for those targets.

This tablegen backend rewrite sets things up for introducing
MachineModel type #2: per opcode/operand cost model.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@159891 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2013
Before: the function name was stored by the compiler as a constant string
and the run-time was printing it.
Now: the PC is stored instead and the run-time prints the full symbolized frame.
This adds a couple of instructions into every function with non-empty stack frame,
but also reduces the binary size because we store less strings (I saw 2% size reduction).
This change bumps the asan ABI version to v3.

llvm part.

Example of report (now):
==31711==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7fffa77cf1c5 at pc 0x41feb0 bp 0x7fffa77cefb0 sp 0x7fffa77cefa8
READ of size 1 at 0x7fffa77cf1c5 thread T0
    #0 0x41feaf in Frame0(int, char*, char*, char*) stack-oob-frames.cc:20
    #1 0x41f7ff in Frame1(int, char*, char*) stack-oob-frames.cc:24
    #2 0x41f477 in Frame2(int, char*) stack-oob-frames.cc:28
    #3 0x41f194 in Frame3(int) stack-oob-frames.cc:32
    #4 0x41eee0 in main stack-oob-frames.cc:38
    #5 0x7f0c5566f76c (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2176c)
    #6 0x41eb1c (/usr/local/google/kcc/llvm_cmake/a.out+0x41eb1c)
Address 0x7fffa77cf1c5 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 293 in frame
    #0 0x41f87f in Frame0(int, char*, char*, char*) stack-oob-frames.cc:12  <<<<<<<<<<<<<< this is new
  This frame has 6 object(s):
    [32, 36) 'frame.addr'
    [96, 104) 'a.addr'
    [160, 168) 'b.addr'
    [224, 232) 'c.addr'
    [288, 292) 's'
    [352, 360) 'd'




git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177724 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2013
Rather than just splitting the input type and hoping for the best, apply
a bit more cleverness. Just splitting the types until the source is
legal often leads to an illegal result time, which is then widened and a
scalarization step is introduced which leads to truly horrible code
generation. With the loop vectorizer, these sorts of operations are much
more common, and so it's worth extra effort to do them well.

Add a legalization hook for the operands of a TRUNCATE node, which will
be encountered after the result type has been legalized, but if the
operand type is still illegal. If simple splitting of both types
ends up with the result type of each half still being legal, just
do that (v16i16 -> v16i8 on ARM, for example). If, however, that would
result in an illegal result type (v8i32 -> v8i8 on ARM, for example),
we can get more clever with power-two vectors. Specifically,
split the input type, but also widen the result element size, then
concatenate the halves and truncate again.  For example on ARM,
To perform a "%res = v8i8 trunc v8i32 %in" we transform to:
  %inlo = v4i32 extract_subvector %in, 0
  %inhi = v4i32 extract_subvector %in, 4
  %lo16 = v4i16 trunc v4i32 %inlo
  %hi16 = v4i16 trunc v4i32 %inhi
  %in16 = v8i16 concat_vectors v4i16 %lo16, v4i16 %hi16
  %res = v8i8 trunc v8i16 %in16

This allows instruction selection to generate three VMOVN instructions
instead of a sequences of moves, stores and loads.

Update the ARMTargetTransformInfo to take this improved legalization
into account.

Consider the simplified IR:

define <16 x i8> @test1(<16 x i32>* %ap) {
  %a = load <16 x i32>* %ap
  %tmp = trunc <16 x i32> %a to <16 x i8>
  ret <16 x i8> %tmp
}

define <8 x i8> @test2(<8 x i32>* %ap) {
  %a = load <8 x i32>* %ap
  %tmp = trunc <8 x i32> %a to <8 x i8>
  ret <8 x i8> %tmp
}

Previously, we would generate the truly hideous:
	.syntax unified
	.section	__TEXT,__text,regular,pure_instructions
	.globl	_test1
	.align	2
_test1:                                 @ @test1
@ BB#0:
	push	{r7}
	mov	r7, sp
	sub	sp, sp, #20
	bic	sp, sp, #7
	add	r1, r0, #48
	add	r2, r0, #32
	vld1.64	{d24, d25}, [r0:128]
	vld1.64	{d16, d17}, [r1:128]
	vld1.64	{d18, d19}, [r2:128]
	add	r1, r0, #16
	vmovn.i32	d22, q8
	vld1.64	{d16, d17}, [r1:128]
	vmovn.i32	d20, q9
	vmovn.i32	d18, q12
	vmov.u16	r0, d22[3]
	strb	r0, [sp, #15]
	vmov.u16	r0, d22[2]
	strb	r0, [sp, #14]
	vmov.u16	r0, d22[1]
	strb	r0, [sp, #13]
	vmov.u16	r0, d22[0]
	vmovn.i32	d16, q8
	strb	r0, [sp, #12]
	vmov.u16	r0, d20[3]
	strb	r0, [sp, #11]
	vmov.u16	r0, d20[2]
	strb	r0, [sp, #10]
	vmov.u16	r0, d20[1]
	strb	r0, [sp, #9]
	vmov.u16	r0, d20[0]
	strb	r0, [sp, #8]
	vmov.u16	r0, d18[3]
	strb	r0, [sp, #3]
	vmov.u16	r0, d18[2]
	strb	r0, [sp, #2]
	vmov.u16	r0, d18[1]
	strb	r0, [sp, #1]
	vmov.u16	r0, d18[0]
	strb	r0, [sp]
	vmov.u16	r0, d16[3]
	strb	r0, [sp, #7]
	vmov.u16	r0, d16[2]
	strb	r0, [sp, #6]
	vmov.u16	r0, d16[1]
	strb	r0, [sp, #5]
	vmov.u16	r0, d16[0]
	strb	r0, [sp, #4]
	vldmia	sp, {d16, d17}
	vmov	r0, r1, d16
	vmov	r2, r3, d17
	mov	sp, r7
	pop	{r7}
	bx	lr

	.globl	_test2
	.align	2
_test2:                                 @ @test2
@ BB#0:
	push	{r7}
	mov	r7, sp
	sub	sp, sp, #12
	bic	sp, sp, #7
	vld1.64	{d16, d17}, [r0:128]
	add	r0, r0, #16
	vld1.64	{d20, d21}, [r0:128]
	vmovn.i32	d18, q8
	vmov.u16	r0, d18[3]
	vmovn.i32	d16, q10
	strb	r0, [sp, #3]
	vmov.u16	r0, d18[2]
	strb	r0, [sp, #2]
	vmov.u16	r0, d18[1]
	strb	r0, [sp, #1]
	vmov.u16	r0, d18[0]
	strb	r0, [sp]
	vmov.u16	r0, d16[3]
	strb	r0, [sp, #7]
	vmov.u16	r0, d16[2]
	strb	r0, [sp, #6]
	vmov.u16	r0, d16[1]
	strb	r0, [sp, #5]
	vmov.u16	r0, d16[0]
	strb	r0, [sp, #4]
	ldm	sp, {r0, r1}
	mov	sp, r7
	pop	{r7}
	bx	lr

Now, however, we generate the much more straightforward:
	.syntax unified
	.section	__TEXT,__text,regular,pure_instructions
	.globl	_test1
	.align	2
_test1:                                 @ @test1
@ BB#0:
	add	r1, r0, #48
	add	r2, r0, #32
	vld1.64	{d20, d21}, [r0:128]
	vld1.64	{d16, d17}, [r1:128]
	add	r1, r0, #16
	vld1.64	{d18, d19}, [r2:128]
	vld1.64	{d22, d23}, [r1:128]
	vmovn.i32	d17, q8
	vmovn.i32	d16, q9
	vmovn.i32	d18, q10
	vmovn.i32	d19, q11
	vmovn.i16	d17, q8
	vmovn.i16	d16, q9
	vmov	r0, r1, d16
	vmov	r2, r3, d17
	bx	lr

	.globl	_test2
	.align	2
_test2:                                 @ @test2
@ BB#0:
	vld1.64	{d16, d17}, [r0:128]
	add	r0, r0, #16
	vld1.64	{d18, d19}, [r0:128]
	vmovn.i32	d16, q8
	vmovn.i32	d17, q9
	vmovn.i16	d16, q8
	vmov	r0, r1, d16
	bx	lr

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179989 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2013
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r182486 | d0k | 2013-05-22 10:01:12 -0700 (Wed, 22 May 2013) | 3 lines

X86: When expanding PCMPGTQ to PCMPGTD we always want to compare the lower halves as unsigned.

Take #2 on fixing PR15977.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_33@182489 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2013
…lower halves as unsigned.

Take #2 on fixing PR15977.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@182486 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2013
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2013
order of slices of the alloca which have exactly the same size and other
properties. This was found by a perniciously unstable sort
implementation used to flush out buggy uses of the algorithm.

The fundamental idea is that findCommonType should return the best
common type it can find across all of the slices in the range. There
were two bugs here previously:

1) We would accept an integer type smaller than a byte-width multiple,
   and if there were different bit-width integer types, we would accept
   the first one. This caused an actual failure in the testcase updated
   here when the sort order changed.
2) If we found a bad combination of types or a non-load, non-store use
   before an integer typed load or store we would bail, but if we found
   the integere typed load or store, we would use it. The correct
   behavior is to always use an integer typed operation which covers the
   partition if one exists.

While a clever debugging sort algorithm found problem #1 in our existing
test cases, I have no useful test case ideas for #2. I spotted in by
inspection when looking at this code.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195118 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2013
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r195118 | chandlerc | 2013-11-19 01:03:18 -0800 (Tue, 19 Nov 2013) | 22 lines

Fix an issue where SROA computed different results based on the relative
order of slices of the alloca which have exactly the same size and other
properties. This was found by a perniciously unstable sort
implementation used to flush out buggy uses of the algorithm.

The fundamental idea is that findCommonType should return the best
common type it can find across all of the slices in the range. There
were two bugs here previously:

1) We would accept an integer type smaller than a byte-width multiple,
   and if there were different bit-width integer types, we would accept
   the first one. This caused an actual failure in the testcase updated
   here when the sort order changed.
2) If we found a bad combination of types or a non-load, non-store use
   before an integer typed load or store we would bail, but if we found
   the integere typed load or store, we would use it. The correct
   behavior is to always use an integer typed operation which covers the
   partition if one exists.

While a clever debugging sort algorithm found problem #1 in our existing
test cases, I have no useful test case ideas for #2. I spotted in by
inspection when looking at this code.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_34@195217 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2013
I forgot to commit them. They were staging in my local repo.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195924 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2013
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2014
Originally, BLX was passed as operand #0 in MachineInstr and as operand
#2 in MCInst. But now, it's operand #2 in both cases.

This patch also removes unnecessary FileCheck in the test case added by r199127.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@199928 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
eliben pushed a commit to eliben/llvm that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2014
…ify-libcall

optimize a call to a llvm intrinsic to something that invovles a call to a C
library call, make sure it sets the right calling convention on the call.

e.g.
extern double pow(double, double);
double t(double x) {
  return pow(10, x);
}

Compiles to something like this for AAPCS-VFP:
define arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @t(double %x) #0 {
entry:
  %0 = call double @llvm.pow.f64(double 1.000000e+01, double %x)
  ret double %0
}

declare double @llvm.pow.f64(double, double) llvm-mirror#1

Simplify libcall (part of instcombine) will turn the above into:
define arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @t(double %x) #0 {
entry:
  %__exp10 = call double @__exp10(double %x) llvm-mirror#1
  ret double %__exp10
}

declare double @__exp10(double)

The pre-instcombine code works because calls to LLVM builtins are special.
Instruction selection will chose the right calling convention for the call.
However, the code after instcombine is wrong. The call to __exp10 will use
the C calling convention.

I can think of 3 options to fix this.

1. Make "C" calling convention just work since the target should know what CC
   is being used.

   This doesn't work because each function can use different CC with the "pcs"
   attribute.

2. Have Clang add the right CC keyword on the calls to LLVM builtin.

   This will work but it doesn't match the LLVM IR specification which states
   these are "Standard C Library Intrinsics".

3. Fix simplify libcall so the resulting calls to the C routines will have the
   proper CC keyword. e.g.
   %__exp10 = call arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @__exp10(double %x) llvm-mirror#1

   This works and is the solution I implemented here.

Both solutions llvm-mirror#2 and llvm-mirror#3 would work. After carefully considering the pros and
cons, I decided to implement llvm-mirror#3 for the following reasons.

1. It doesn't change the "spec" of the intrinsics.
2. It's a self-contained fix.

There are a couple of potential downsides.
1. There could be other places in the optimizer that is broken in the same way
   that's not addressed by this.
2. There could be other calling conventions that need to be propagated by
   simplify-libcall that's not handled.

But for now, this is the fix that I'm most comfortable with.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203488 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2014
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2014
LazyCallGraph. This is the start of the whole point of this different
abstraction, but it is just the initial bits. Here is a run-down of
what's going on here. I'm planning to incorporate some (or all) of this
into comments going forward, hopefully with better editing and wording.
=]

The crux of the problem with the traditional way of building SCCs is
that they are ephemeral. The new pass manager however really needs the
ability to associate analysis passes and results of analysis passes with
SCCs in order to expose these analysis passes to the SCC passes. Making
this work is kind-of the whole point of the new pass manager. =]

So, when we're building SCCs for the call graph, we actually want to
build persistent nodes that stick around and can be reasoned about
later. We'd also like the ability to walk the SCC graph in more complex
ways than just the traditional postorder traversal of the current CGSCC
walk. That means that in addition to being persistent, the SCCs need to
be connected into a useful graph structure.

However, we still want the SCCs to be formed lazily where possible.

These constraints are quite hard to satisfy with the SCC iterator. Also,
using that would bypass our ability to actually add data to the nodes of
the call graph to facilite implementing the Tarjan walk. So I've
re-implemented things in a more direct and embedded way. This
immediately makes it easy to get the persistence and connectivity
correct, and it also allows leveraging the existing nodes to simplify
the algorithm. I've worked somewhat to make this implementation more
closely follow the traditional paper's nomenclature and strategy,
although it is still a bit obtuse because it isn't recursive, using
an explicit stack and a tail call instead, and it is interruptable,
resuming each time we need another SCC.

The other tricky bit here, and what actually took almost all the time
and trials and errors I spent building this, is exactly *what* graph
structure to build for the SCCs. The naive thing to build is the call
graph in its newly acyclic form. I wrote about 4 versions of this which
did precisely this. Inevitably, when I experimented with them across
various use cases, they became incredibly awkward. It was all
implementable, but it felt like a complete wrong fit. Square peg, round
hole. There were two overriding aspects that pushed me in a different
direction:

1) We want to discover the SCC graph in a postorder fashion. That means
   the root node will be the *last* node we find. Using the call-SCC DAG
   as the graph structure of the SCCs results in an orphaned graph until
   we discover a root.

2) We will eventually want to walk the SCC graph in parallel, exploring
   distinct sub-graphs independently, and synchronizing at merge points.
   This again is not helped by the call-SCC DAG structure.

The structure which, quite surprisingly, ended up being completely
natural to use is the *inverse* of the call-SCC DAG. We add the leaf
SCCs to the graph as "roots", and have edges to the caller SCCs. Once
I switched to building this structure, everything just fell into place
elegantly.

Aside from general cleanups (there are FIXMEs and too few comments
overall) that are still needed, the other missing piece of this is
support for iterating across levels of the SCC graph. These will become
useful for implementing #2, but they aren't an immediate priority.

Once SCCs are in good shape, I'll be working on adding mutation support
for incremental updates and adding the pass manager that this analysis
enables.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206581 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2014
This reverts commit r206622 and the MSVC fixup in r206626.

Apparently the remotely failing tests are still failing, despite my
attempt to fix the nondeterminism in r206621.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206628 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2014
This reverts commit r206628, reapplying r206622 (and r206626).

Two tests are failing only on buildbots [1][2]: i.e., I can't reproduce
on Darwin, and Chandler can't reproduce on Linux.  Asan and valgrind
don't tell us anything, but we're hoping the msan bot will catch it.

So, I'm applying this again to get more feedback from the bots.  I'll
leave it in long enough to trigger builds in at least the sanitizer
buildbots (it was failing for reasons unrelated to my commit last time
it was in), and hopefully a few others.... and then I expect to revert a
third time.

[1]: http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/ninja-x64-msvc-RA-centos6/builds/1816
[2]: http://llvm-amd64.freebsd.your.org/b/builders/clang-i386-freebsd/builds/18445

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206666 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2014
This reverts commit r206666, as planned.

Still stumped on why the bots are failing.  Sanitizer bots haven't
turned anything up.  If anyone can help me debug either of the failures
(referenced in r206666) I'll owe them a beer.  (In the meantime, I'll be
auditing my patch for undefined behaviour.)

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206677 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
bgamari added a commit to bgamari/llvm that referenced this pull request May 23, 2014
bgamari added a commit to bgamari/llvm that referenced this pull request May 23, 2014
bgamari added a commit to bgamari/llvm that referenced this pull request May 23, 2014
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2014
Our internal test reveals such case should not be transformed:

  cmp x17, #3
  b.lt .LBB10_15
  ...
  subs x12, x12, #1
  b.gt .LBB10_1

where x12 is a liveout, becomes:

  cmp x17, #2
  b.le .LBB10_15
  ...
  subs x12, x12, #2
  b.ge .LBB10_1

Unable to provide test case as it's difficult to reproduce on community branch.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D6048
Patch by Zhaoshi Zheng <zhaoshiz@codeaurora.org>!

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220987 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-mirror pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2014
This commit introduces heap-use-after-free detected by ASan. Here is the output
for one of several tests that detect it:

******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Linker/AppendingLinkage.ll' FAILED ********************
Command Output (stderr):
--
=================================================================
==2122==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x60c00000b9c8 at pc 0x0000005d05d1 bp 0x7fff64ed27c0 sp 0x7fff64ed27b8
READ of size 4 at 0x60c00000b9c8 thread T0
    #0 0x5d05d0 in llvm::GlobalValue::setUnnamedAddr(bool) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../include/llvm/IR/GlobalValue.h:115:35
    #1 0x69fff1 in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::linkGlobalValueProto(llvm::GlobalValue*) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1041:5
    #2 0x697229 in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::run() /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1485:9
    #3 0x696542 in llvm::Linker::linkInModule(llvm::Module*) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1621:10
    #4 0x4a2db7 in main /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../tools/llvm-link/llvm-link.cpp:116:9
    #5 0x7f4ae61e5ec4 in __libc_start_main /build/buildd/eglibc-2.19/csu/libc-start.c:287
    #6 0x41eb71 in _start (/usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/bin/llvm-link+0x41eb71)

0x60c00000b9c8 is located 72 bytes inside of 128-byte region [0x60c00000b980,0x60c00000ba00)
freed by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x4a1e6b in operator delete(void*) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/opt-build/../projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:94:3
    #1 0x5d1a7a in llvm::iplist<llvm::GlobalVariable, llvm::ilist_traits<llvm::GlobalVariable> >::erase(llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::GlobalVariable>) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../inclu
de/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:466:5
    #2 0x5d1980 in llvm::GlobalVariable::eraseFromParent() /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/IR/Globals.cpp:204:3
    #3 0x6a8a4d in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::linkAppendingVarProto(llvm::GlobalVariable*, llvm::GlobalVariable const*) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.
cpp:980:3
    #4 0x6a7403 in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::linkGlobalVariableProto(llvm::GlobalVariable const*, llvm::GlobalValue*, bool) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkMod
ules.cpp:1074:11
    #5 0x69ff4e in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::linkGlobalValueProto(llvm::GlobalValue*) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1028:13
    #6 0x697229 in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::run() /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1485:9
    #7 0x696542 in llvm::Linker::linkInModule(llvm::Module*) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1621:10
    #8 0x4a2db7 in main /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../tools/llvm-link/llvm-link.cpp:116:9
    #9 0x7f4ae61e5ec4 in __libc_start_main /build/buildd/eglibc-2.19/csu/libc-start.c:287

previously allocated by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x4a192b in operator new(unsigned long) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/opt-build/../projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:62:35
    #1 0x61d85c in llvm::User::operator new(unsigned long, unsigned int) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/IR/User.cpp:57:19
    #2 0x6a7525 in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::linkGlobalVariableProto(llvm::GlobalVariable const*, llvm::GlobalValue*, bool) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkMod
ules.cpp:1100:3
    #3 0x69ff4e in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::linkGlobalValueProto(llvm::GlobalValue*) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1028:13
    #4 0x697229 in (anonymous namespace)::ModuleLinker::run() /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1485:9
    #5 0x696542 in llvm::Linker::linkInModule(llvm::Module*) /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp:1621:10
    #6 0x4a2db7 in main /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../tools/llvm-link/llvm-link.cpp:116:9
    #7 0x7f4ae61e5ec4 in __libc_start_main /build/buildd/eglibc-2.19/csu/libc-start.c:287

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free /usr/local/google/home/chandlerc/src/llvm/build/../include/llvm/IR/GlobalValue.h:115 llvm::GlobalValue::setUnnamedAddr(bool)
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
  0x0c187fff96e0: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x0c187fff96f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x0c187fff9700: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fa
  0x0c187fff9710: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x0c187fff9720: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
=>0x0c187fff9730: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd[fd]fd fd fd fd fd fd
  0x0c187fff9740: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
  0x0c187fff9750: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x0c187fff9760: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
  0x0c187fff9770: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
  0x0c187fff9780: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
  Addressable:           00
  Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
  Heap left redzone:       fa
  Heap right redzone:      fb
  Freed heap region:       fd
  Stack left redzone:      f1
  Stack mid redzone:       f2
  Stack right redzone:     f3
  Stack partial redzone:   f4
  Stack after return:      f5
  Stack use after scope:   f8
  Global redzone:          f9
  Global init order:       f6
  Poisoned by user:        f7
  Container overflow:      fc
  Array cookie:            ac
  ASan internal:           fe
==2122==ABORTING

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221096 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2018
Summary:
This is a continuation of https://reviews.llvm.org/D49727
Below the original text, current changes in the comments:

Currently, in line with GCC, when specifying reserved registers like sp or pc on an inline asm() clobber list, we don't always preserve the original value across the statement. And in general, overwriting reserved registers can have surprising results.

For example:

  extern int bar(int[]);
  
  int foo(int i) {
    int a[i]; // VLA
    asm volatile(
        "mov r7, #1"
      :
      :
      : "r7"
    );
  
    return 1 + bar(a);
  }

Compiled for thumb, this gives:

  $ clang --target=arm-arm-none-eabi -march=armv7a -c test.c -o - -S -O1 -mthumb
  ...
  foo:
          .fnstart
  @ %bb.0:                                @ %entry
          .save   {r4, r5, r6, r7, lr}
          push    {r4, r5, r6, r7, lr}
          .setfp  r7, sp, #12
          add     r7, sp, #12
          .pad    #4
          sub     sp, #4
          movs    r1, #7
          add.w   r0, r1, r0, lsl #2
          bic     r0, r0, #7
          sub.w   r0, sp, r0
          mov     sp, r0
          @app
          mov.w   r7, #1
          @NO_APP
          bl      bar
          adds    r0, #1
          sub.w   r4, r7, #12
          mov     sp, r4
          pop     {r4, r5, r6, r7, pc}
  ...

r7 is used as the frame pointer for thumb targets, and this function needs to restore the SP from the FP because of the variable-length stack allocation a. r7 is clobbered by the inline assembly (and r7 is included in the clobber list), but LLVM does not preserve the value of the frame pointer across the assembly block.

This type of behavior is similar to GCC's and has been discussed on the bugtracker: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11807 . No consensus seemed to have been reached on the way forward. Clang behavior has briefly been discussed on the CFE mailing (starting here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-July/058392.html). I've opted for following Eli Friedman's advice to print warnings when there are reserved registers on the clobber list so as not to diverge from GCC behavior for now.

The patch uses MachineRegisterInfo's target-specific knowledge of reserved registers, just before we convert the inline asm string in the AsmPrinter.

If we find a reserved register, we print a warning:

  repro.c:6:7: warning: inline asm clobber list contains reserved registers: R7 [-Winline-asm]
        "mov r7, #1"
        ^

Reviewers: efriedma, olista01, javed.absar

Reviewed By: efriedma

Subscribers: eraman, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51165

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@341062 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2018
…>> (32 - y) pattern"

*Seems* to be breaking sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast buildbot,
the ELF/relocatable-versioned.s test:

==17758==MemorySanitizer CHECK failed: /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator.cc:191 "((kBlockMagic)) == ((((u64*)addr)[0]))" (0x6a6cb03abcebc041, 0x0)
    #0 0x59716b in MsanCheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan.cc:393
    #1 0x586635 in __sanitizer::CheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_termination.cc:79
    #2 0x57d5ff in __sanitizer::InternalFree(void*, __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocatorLocalCache<__sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator32<__sanitizer::AP32> >*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator.cc:191
    #3 0x7fc21b24193f  (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3593f)
    #4 0x7fc21b241999 in exit (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x35999)
    #5 0x7fc21b22c2e7 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e7)
    #6 0x57c039 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/lld+0x57c039)

This reverts commit r345014.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@345017 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2018
Summary:
As a bonus, this arguably improves the code by making it simpler.

gcc 8 on Ubuntu 18.10 reports the following:

==39667==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope on address 0x7fffffff8ae0 at pc 0x555555dbfc68 bp 0x7fffffff8760 sp 0x7fffffff8750
WRITE of size 8 at 0x7fffffff8ae0 thread T0
    #0 0x555555dbfc67 in std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_Alloc_hider::_Alloc_hider(char*, std::allocator<char>&&) /usr/include/c++/8/bits/basic_string.h:149
    #1 0x555555dbfc67 in std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >&&) /usr/include/c++/8/bits/basic_string.h:542
    #2 0x555555dbfc67 in std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > std::operator+<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >(char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >&&) /usr/include/c++/8/bits/basic_string.h:6009
    #3 0x555555dbfc67 in searchableFieldType /home/nha/amd/build/san/llvm-src/utils/TableGen/SearchableTableEmitter.cpp:168
    (...)

Address 0x7fffffff8ae0 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 864 in frame
    #0 0x555555dbef3f in searchableFieldType /home/nha/amd/build/san/llvm-src/utils/TableGen/SearchableTableEmitter.cpp:148

Reviewers: fhahn, simon_tatham, kparzysz

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53931

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@345749 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dylanmckay pushed a commit to dylanmckay/llvm that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2018
…>> (32 - y) pattern"

*Seems* to be breaking sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast buildbot,
the ELF/relocatable-versioned.s test:

==17758==MemorySanitizer CHECK failed: /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator.cc:191 "((kBlockMagic)) == ((((u64*)addr)[0]))" (0x6a6cb03abcebc041, 0x0)
    #0 0x59716b in MsanCheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan.cc:393
    llvm-mirror#1 0x586635 in __sanitizer::CheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_termination.cc:79
    llvm-mirror#2 0x57d5ff in __sanitizer::InternalFree(void*, __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocatorLocalCache<__sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator32<__sanitizer::AP32> >*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator.cc:191
    llvm-mirror#3 0x7fc21b24193f  (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3593f)
    llvm-mirror#4 0x7fc21b241999 in exit (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x35999)
    llvm-mirror#5 0x7fc21b22c2e7 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e7)
    llvm-mirror#6 0x57c039 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/lld+0x57c039)

This reverts commit r345014.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@345017 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dylanmckay pushed a commit to dylanmckay/llvm that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2018
Summary:
As a bonus, this arguably improves the code by making it simpler.

gcc 8 on Ubuntu 18.10 reports the following:

==39667==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope on address 0x7fffffff8ae0 at pc 0x555555dbfc68 bp 0x7fffffff8760 sp 0x7fffffff8750
WRITE of size 8 at 0x7fffffff8ae0 thread T0
    #0 0x555555dbfc67 in std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_Alloc_hider::_Alloc_hider(char*, std::allocator<char>&&) /usr/include/c++/8/bits/basic_string.h:149
    llvm-mirror#1 0x555555dbfc67 in std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >&&) /usr/include/c++/8/bits/basic_string.h:542
    llvm-mirror#2 0x555555dbfc67 in std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > std::operator+<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >(char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >&&) /usr/include/c++/8/bits/basic_string.h:6009
    llvm-mirror#3 0x555555dbfc67 in searchableFieldType /home/nha/amd/build/san/llvm-src/utils/TableGen/SearchableTableEmitter.cpp:168
    (...)

Address 0x7fffffff8ae0 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 864 in frame
    #0 0x555555dbef3f in searchableFieldType /home/nha/amd/build/san/llvm-src/utils/TableGen/SearchableTableEmitter.cpp:148

Reviewers: fhahn, simon_tatham, kparzysz

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53931

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@345749 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2018
Flags variable was not initialized and later used (both isMBBSafeToOutlineFrom
implementations assume it's initialized), which breaks
test/CodeGen/AArch64/machine-outliner.mir. under memory sanitizer:
MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    #0  in llvm::AArch64InstrInfo::getOutliningType(llvm::MachineInstrBundleIterator<llvm::MachineInstr, false>&, unsigned int) const llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.cpp:5494:9
    #1  in (anonymous namespace)::InstructionMapper::convertToUnsignedVec(llvm::MachineBasicBlock&, llvm::TargetInstrInfo const&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineOutliner.cpp:772:19
    #2  in (anonymous namespace)::MachineOutliner::populateMapper((anonymous namespace)::InstructionMapper&, llvm::Module&, llvm::MachineModuleInfo&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineOutliner.cpp:1543:14
    #3  in (anonymous namespace)::MachineOutliner::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineOutliner.cpp:1645:3
    #4  in (anonymous namespace)::MPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1744:27
    #5  in llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1857:44
    #6  in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&) llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:597:8

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@346761 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
erikolofsson pushed a commit to Malterlib/llvm that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2019
A DAG-NOT-DAG is a CHECK-DAG group, X, followed by a CHECK-NOT group,
N, followed by a CHECK-DAG group, Y.  Let y be the initial directive
of Y.  This patch makes the following changes to the behavior:

    1. Directives in N can no longer match within part of Y's match
       range just because y happens not to be the earliest match from
       Y.  Specifically, this patch withdraws N's search range end
       from y's match range start to Y's match range start.

    2. y can no longer match within X's match range, where a y match
       produced a reordering complaint, which is thus no longer
       possible.  Specifically, this patch withdraws y's search range
       start from X's permitted range start to X's match range end,
       which was already the search range start for other members of
       Y.

Both of these changes can only increase the number of test passes: llvm-mirror#1
constrains the ability of CHECK-NOTs to match, and llvm-mirror#2 expands the
ability of CHECK-DAGs to match without complaints.

These changes are based on discussions at:

   <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123550.html>
   <https://reviews.llvm.org/D47106>

which conclude that:

    1. These changes simplify the FileCheck conceptual model.  First,
       it makes search ranges for DAG-NOT-DAG more consistent with
       other cases.  Second, it was confusing that y was treated
       differently from the rest of Y.

    2. These changes add theoretical use cases for DAG-NOT-DAG that
       had no obvious means to be expressed otherwise.  We can justify
       the first half of this assertion with the observation that
       these changes can only increase the number of test passes.

    3. Reordering detection for DAG-NOT-DAG had no obvious real
       benefit.

We don't have evidence from real uses cases to help us debate
conclusions llvm-mirror#2 and llvm-mirror#3, but llvm-mirror#1 at least seems intuitive.

Reviewed By: probinson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48986

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@337605 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
erikolofsson pushed a commit to Malterlib/llvm that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2019
A DAG-NOT-DAG is a CHECK-DAG group, X, followed by a CHECK-NOT group,
N, followed by a CHECK-DAG group, Y.  Let y be the initial directive
of Y.  This patch makes the following changes to the behavior:

    1. Directives in N can no longer match within part of Y's match
       range just because y happens not to be the earliest match from
       Y.  Specifically, this patch withdraws N's search range end
       from y's match range start to Y's match range start.

    2. y can no longer match within X's match range, where a y match
       produced a reordering complaint, which is thus no longer
       possible.  Specifically, this patch withdraws y's search range
       start from X's permitted range start to X's match range end,
       which was already the search range start for other members of
       Y.

Both of these changes can only increase the number of test passes: llvm-mirror#1
constrains the ability of CHECK-NOTs to match, and llvm-mirror#2 expands the
ability of CHECK-DAGs to match without complaints.

These changes are based on discussions at:

   <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123550.html>
   <https://reviews.llvm.org/D47106>

which conclude that:

    1. These changes simplify the FileCheck conceptual model.  First,
       it makes search ranges for DAG-NOT-DAG more consistent with
       other cases.  Second, it was confusing that y was treated
       differently from the rest of Y.

    2. These changes add theoretical use cases for DAG-NOT-DAG that
       had no obvious means to be expressed otherwise.  We can justify
       the first half of this assertion with the observation that
       these changes can only increase the number of test passes.

    3. Reordering detection for DAG-NOT-DAG had no obvious real
       benefit.

We don't have evidence from real uses cases to help us debate
conclusions llvm-mirror#2 and llvm-mirror#3, but llvm-mirror#1 at least seems intuitive.

Reviewed By: probinson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48986

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@337605 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2019
Summary:
Scanning blocks in sub-loops for uses is unnecessary, as they were
already handled while dealing with the containing sub-loop.

This speeds up LCSSA for highly nested loops. For the test case in PR37202, it
halves the time spent in LCSSA. In cases were we won't be able to skip
any blocks, the additional lookup should be negligible.

Time-passes without this patch for test case from PR37202:

  Total Execution Time: 48.5505 seconds (48.5511 wall clock)

   ---User Time---   --System Time--   --User+System--   ---Wall Time---  --- Name ---
  10.0822 ( 21.0%)   0.1406 ( 27.0%)  10.2228 ( 21.1%)  10.2228 ( 21.1%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
  10.0417 ( 20.9%)   0.1467 ( 28.2%)  10.1884 ( 21.0%)  10.1890 ( 21.0%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #2
   4.2703 (  8.9%)   0.0040 (  0.8%)   4.2742 (  8.8%)   4.2742 (  8.8%)  Unswitch loops
   2.7376 (  5.7%)   0.0229 (  4.4%)   2.7605 (  5.7%)   2.7611 (  5.7%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #5
   2.7332 (  5.7%)   0.0214 (  4.1%)   2.7546 (  5.7%)   2.7546 (  5.7%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #3
   2.7088 (  5.6%)   0.0230 (  4.4%)   2.7319 (  5.6%)   2.7324 (  5.6%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #4
   2.6855 (  5.6%)   0.0236 (  4.5%)   2.7091 (  5.6%)   2.7090 (  5.6%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #6
   2.1648 (  4.5%)   0.0018 (  0.4%)   2.1666 (  4.5%)   2.1664 (  4.5%)  Unroll loops
   1.8371 (  3.8%)   0.0009 (  0.2%)   1.8379 (  3.8%)   1.8380 (  3.8%)  Value Propagation
   1.8149 (  3.8%)   0.0021 (  0.4%)   1.8170 (  3.7%)   1.8169 (  3.7%)  Loop Invariant Code Motion
   1.6755 (  3.5%)   0.0226 (  4.3%)   1.6981 (  3.5%)   1.6980 (  3.5%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #7

Time-passes with this patch

  Total Execution Time: 29.9285 seconds (29.9276 wall clock)

   ---User Time---   --System Time--   --User+System--   ---Wall Time---  --- Name ---
   5.2786 ( 17.7%)   0.0021 (  1.2%)   5.2806 ( 17.6%)   5.2808 ( 17.6%)  Unswitch loops
   4.3739 ( 14.7%)   0.0303 ( 18.1%)   4.4042 ( 14.7%)   4.4042 ( 14.7%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
   4.2658 ( 14.3%)   0.0192 ( 11.5%)   4.2850 ( 14.3%)   4.2851 ( 14.3%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #2
   2.2307 (  7.5%)   0.0013 (  0.8%)   2.2320 (  7.5%)   2.2318 (  7.5%)  Loop Invariant Code Motion
   2.0888 (  7.0%)   0.0012 (  0.7%)   2.0900 (  7.0%)   2.0897 (  7.0%)  Unroll loops
   1.6761 (  5.6%)   0.0013 (  0.8%)   1.6774 (  5.6%)   1.6774 (  5.6%)  Value Propagation
   1.3686 (  4.6%)   0.0029 (  1.8%)   1.3716 (  4.6%)   1.3714 (  4.6%)  Induction Variable Simplification
   1.1457 (  3.8%)   0.0010 (  0.6%)   1.1468 (  3.8%)   1.1468 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #4
   1.1384 (  3.8%)   0.0005 (  0.3%)   1.1389 (  3.8%)   1.1389 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #6
   1.1360 (  3.8%)   0.0027 (  1.6%)   1.1387 (  3.8%)   1.1387 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #5
   1.1331 (  3.8%)   0.0010 (  0.6%)   1.1341 (  3.8%)   1.1340 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #3

Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mzolotukhin

Reviewed By: davide, efriedma

Subscribers: hiraditya, dmgreen, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56848

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@351567 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dylanmckay pushed a commit to dylanmckay/llvm that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2019
Summary:
Scanning blocks in sub-loops for uses is unnecessary, as they were
already handled while dealing with the containing sub-loop.

This speeds up LCSSA for highly nested loops. For the test case in PR37202, it
halves the time spent in LCSSA. In cases were we won't be able to skip
any blocks, the additional lookup should be negligible.

Time-passes without this patch for test case from PR37202:

  Total Execution Time: 48.5505 seconds (48.5511 wall clock)

   ---User Time---   --System Time--   --User+System--   ---Wall Time---  --- Name ---
  10.0822 ( 21.0%)   0.1406 ( 27.0%)  10.2228 ( 21.1%)  10.2228 ( 21.1%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
  10.0417 ( 20.9%)   0.1467 ( 28.2%)  10.1884 ( 21.0%)  10.1890 ( 21.0%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass llvm-mirror#2
   4.2703 (  8.9%)   0.0040 (  0.8%)   4.2742 (  8.8%)   4.2742 (  8.8%)  Unswitch loops
   2.7376 (  5.7%)   0.0229 (  4.4%)   2.7605 (  5.7%)   2.7611 (  5.7%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass llvm-mirror#5
   2.7332 (  5.7%)   0.0214 (  4.1%)   2.7546 (  5.7%)   2.7546 (  5.7%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass llvm-mirror#3
   2.7088 (  5.6%)   0.0230 (  4.4%)   2.7319 (  5.6%)   2.7324 (  5.6%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass llvm-mirror#4
   2.6855 (  5.6%)   0.0236 (  4.5%)   2.7091 (  5.6%)   2.7090 (  5.6%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass llvm-mirror#6
   2.1648 (  4.5%)   0.0018 (  0.4%)   2.1666 (  4.5%)   2.1664 (  4.5%)  Unroll loops
   1.8371 (  3.8%)   0.0009 (  0.2%)   1.8379 (  3.8%)   1.8380 (  3.8%)  Value Propagation
   1.8149 (  3.8%)   0.0021 (  0.4%)   1.8170 (  3.7%)   1.8169 (  3.7%)  Loop Invariant Code Motion
   1.6755 (  3.5%)   0.0226 (  4.3%)   1.6981 (  3.5%)   1.6980 (  3.5%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass llvm-mirror#7

Time-passes with this patch

  Total Execution Time: 29.9285 seconds (29.9276 wall clock)

   ---User Time---   --System Time--   --User+System--   ---Wall Time---  --- Name ---
   5.2786 ( 17.7%)   0.0021 (  1.2%)   5.2806 ( 17.6%)   5.2808 ( 17.6%)  Unswitch loops
   4.3739 ( 14.7%)   0.0303 ( 18.1%)   4.4042 ( 14.7%)   4.4042 ( 14.7%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
   4.2658 ( 14.3%)   0.0192 ( 11.5%)   4.2850 ( 14.3%)   4.2851 ( 14.3%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass llvm-mirror#2
   2.2307 (  7.5%)   0.0013 (  0.8%)   2.2320 (  7.5%)   2.2318 (  7.5%)  Loop Invariant Code Motion
   2.0888 (  7.0%)   0.0012 (  0.7%)   2.0900 (  7.0%)   2.0897 (  7.0%)  Unroll loops
   1.6761 (  5.6%)   0.0013 (  0.8%)   1.6774 (  5.6%)   1.6774 (  5.6%)  Value Propagation
   1.3686 (  4.6%)   0.0029 (  1.8%)   1.3716 (  4.6%)   1.3714 (  4.6%)  Induction Variable Simplification
   1.1457 (  3.8%)   0.0010 (  0.6%)   1.1468 (  3.8%)   1.1468 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass llvm-mirror#4
   1.1384 (  3.8%)   0.0005 (  0.3%)   1.1389 (  3.8%)   1.1389 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass llvm-mirror#6
   1.1360 (  3.8%)   0.0027 (  1.6%)   1.1387 (  3.8%)   1.1387 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass llvm-mirror#5
   1.1331 (  3.8%)   0.0010 (  0.6%)   1.1341 (  3.8%)   1.1340 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass llvm-mirror#3

Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mzolotukhin

Reviewed By: davide, efriedma

Subscribers: hiraditya, dmgreen, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56848

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@351567 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2019
VPlan-native path

Context: Patch Series #2 for outer loop vectorization support in LV
using VPlan. (RFC:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-December/119523.html).

Patch series #2 checks that inner loops are still trivially lock-step
among all vector elements. Non-loop branches are blindly assumed as
divergent.

Changes here implement VPlan based predication algorithm to compute
predicates for blocks that need predication. Predicates are computed
for the VPLoop region in reverse post order. A block's predicate is
computed as OR of the masks of all incoming edges. The mask for an
incoming edge is computed as AND of predecessor block's predicate and
either predecessor's Condition bit or NOT(Condition bit) depending on
whether the edge from predecessor block to the current block is true
or false edge.

Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, hsaito, dcaballe

Reviewed By: fhahn

Patch by Satish Guggilla, thanks!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53349



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@351990 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2019
…implify (#2)

This is the third of a series of patches simplifying llvm-symbolizer
tests. See r352752 and r352753 for the previous two. This patch splits
out a number of distinct test cases from llvm-symbolizer.test into
separate tests, and simplifies them in various ways including:

1) using --obj/positional arguments for the input file and addresses
   instead of stdin,
2) using runtime-generated inputs rather than a pre-canned binary, and
3) testing more specifically (i.e. checking only what is interesting to
   the behaviour changed in the original commit for that test case).

This patch also removes the test case for using --obj. The
tools/llvm-symbolizer/basic.s test already tests this case. Finally,
this patch adds a simple test case to the demangle switch test case to
show that demangling happens by default.

See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40070#c1 for the motivation.

Reviewed by: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57446


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@352754 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2019
If there is only a single available value, all uses must be dominated by
the single value and there is no need to search for a reaching
definition.

This drastically speeds up LCSSA in some cases. For the test case
from PR37202, it speeds up LCSSA construction by 4 times.

Time-passes without this patch for test case from PR37202:

    Total Execution Time: 29.9285 seconds (29.9276 wall clock)

    ---User Time---   --System Time--   --User+System--   ---Wall Time---  --- Name ---
    5.2786 ( 17.7%)   0.0021 (  1.2%)   5.2806 ( 17.6%)   5.2808 ( 17.6%)  Unswitch loops
    4.3739 ( 14.7%)   0.0303 ( 18.1%)   4.4042 ( 14.7%)   4.4042 ( 14.7%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
    4.2658 ( 14.3%)   0.0192 ( 11.5%)   4.2850 ( 14.3%)   4.2851 ( 14.3%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #2
    2.2307 (  7.5%)   0.0013 (  0.8%)   2.2320 (  7.5%)   2.2318 (  7.5%)  Loop Invariant Code Motion
    2.0888 (  7.0%)   0.0012 (  0.7%)   2.0900 (  7.0%)   2.0897 (  7.0%)  Unroll loops
    1.6761 (  5.6%)   0.0013 (  0.8%)   1.6774 (  5.6%)   1.6774 (  5.6%)  Value Propagation
    1.3686 (  4.6%)   0.0029 (  1.8%)   1.3716 (  4.6%)   1.3714 (  4.6%)  Induction Variable Simplification
    1.1457 (  3.8%)   0.0010 (  0.6%)   1.1468 (  3.8%)   1.1468 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #4
    1.1384 (  3.8%)   0.0005 (  0.3%)   1.1389 (  3.8%)   1.1389 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #6
    1.1360 (  3.8%)   0.0027 (  1.6%)   1.1387 (  3.8%)   1.1387 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #5
    1.1331 (  3.8%)   0.0010 (  0.6%)   1.1341 (  3.8%)   1.1340 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #3

Time passes with this patch

  Total Execution Time: 19.2802 seconds (19.2813 wall clock)

   ---User Time---   --System Time--   --User+System--   ---Wall Time---  --- Name ---
   4.4234 ( 23.2%)   0.0038 (  2.0%)   4.4272 ( 23.0%)   4.4273 ( 23.0%)  Unswitch loops
   2.3828 ( 12.5%)   0.0020 (  1.1%)   2.3848 ( 12.4%)   2.3847 ( 12.4%)  Unroll loops
   1.8714 (  9.8%)   0.0020 (  1.1%)   1.8734 (  9.7%)   1.8735 (  9.7%)  Loop Invariant Code Motion
   1.7973 (  9.4%)   0.0022 (  1.2%)   1.7995 (  9.3%)   1.8003 (  9.3%)  Value Propagation
   1.4010 (  7.3%)   0.0033 (  1.8%)   1.4043 (  7.3%)   1.4044 (  7.3%)  Induction Variable Simplification
   0.9978 (  5.2%)   0.0244 ( 13.1%)   1.0222 (  5.3%)   1.0224 (  5.3%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #2
   0.9611 (  5.0%)   0.0257 ( 13.8%)   0.9868 (  5.1%)   0.9868 (  5.1%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
   0.5856 (  3.1%)   0.0015 (  0.8%)   0.5871 (  3.0%)   0.5869 (  3.0%)  Unroll loops #2
   0.4132 (  2.2%)   0.0012 (  0.7%)   0.4145 (  2.1%)   0.4143 (  2.1%)  Loop Invariant Code Motion #3

Reviewers: efriedma, davide, mzolotukhin

Reviewed By: efriedma

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57033

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@352960 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2019
(test commit #2 migrating to git)

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@353533 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2019
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2019
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2019
Introduces memory leak in FunctionTest.GetPointerAlignment that breaks sanitizer buildbots:

```
=================================================================
==2453==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 128 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105
    #1 0x16936bc in llvm::User::operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/User.cpp:151:19
    #2 0x7c3fe9 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:12
    #3 0x7c3fe9 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136
    #4 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #5 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
    #6 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
    #7 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
    #8 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
    #9 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #10 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
    #11 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
    #12 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
    #13 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)

Indirect leak of 40 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105
    #1 0x151be6b in make_unique<llvm::ValueSymbolTable> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:1349:29
    #2 0x151be6b in llvm::Function::Function(llvm::FunctionType*, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, unsigned int, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::Module*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/Function.cpp:241
    #3 0x7c4006 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:16
    #4 0x7c4006 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136
    #5 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #6 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
    #7 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
    #8 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
    #9 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
    #10 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #11 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
    #12 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
    #13 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
    #14 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 168 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
```

See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/builds/11358/steps/check-llvm%20asan/logs/stdio for more information.

Also introduces use-of-uninitialized-value in ConstantsTest.FoldGlobalVariablePtr:
```
==7070==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    #0 0x14e703c in User /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5
    #1 0x14e703c in Constant /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Constant.h:44
    #2 0x14e703c in llvm::GlobalValue::GlobalValue(llvm::Type*, llvm::Value::ValueTy, llvm::Use*, unsigned int, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Twine const&, unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalValue.h:78
    #3 0x14e5467 in GlobalObject /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalObject.h:34:9
    #4 0x14e5467 in llvm::GlobalVariable::GlobalVariable(llvm::Type*, bool, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Constant*, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::GlobalValue::ThreadLocalMode, unsigned int, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/Globals.cpp:314
    #5 0x6938f1 in llvm::(anonymous namespace)::ConstantsTest_FoldGlobalVariablePtr_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantsTest.cpp:565:18
    #6 0x1a240a1 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #7 0x1a240a1 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
    #8 0x1a26d26 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
    #9 0x1a2815f in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
    #10 0x1a43de8 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
    #11 0x1a42c47 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #12 0x1a42c47 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
    #13 0x1a0dfba in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
    #14 0x1a0dfba in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
    #15 0x7f2081c412e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
    #16 0x4dff49 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/unittests/IR/IRTests+0x4dff49)

SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5 in User
```

See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/30222/steps/check-llvm%20msan/logs/stdio for more information.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@355616 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2019
Currently, the type id for a derived type is computed incorrectly.
For example,
  type #1: int
  type #2: ptr to #1

For a global variable "int *a", type #1 will be attributed to variable "a".
This is due to a bug which assigns the type id of the basetype of
that derived type as the derived type's type id. This happens
to "const", "volatile", "restrict", "typedef" and "pointer" types.

This patch fixed this bug, fixed existing test cases and added
a new one focusing on pointers plus other derived types.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@356727 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2019
The size field of a location can be different for each entry, so it is useful to have this displayed in the output of llvm-readobj -stackmap. Below is an example of how the output would look:

Record ID: 2882400000, instruction offset: 16
   3 locations:
     #1: Constant 1, size: 8
     #2: Constant 2, size: 8
     #3: Constant 3, size: 8
   0 live-outs: [ ]

Patch By: jacob.hughes@kcl.ac.uk (with heavy modification by me)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59169



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@358324 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dylanmckay pushed a commit to dylanmckay/llvm that referenced this pull request May 16, 2019
Introduces memory leak in FunctionTest.GetPointerAlignment that breaks sanitizer buildbots:

```
=================================================================
==2453==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 128 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105
    llvm-mirror#1 0x16936bc in llvm::User::operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/User.cpp:151:19
    llvm-mirror#2 0x7c3fe9 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:12
    llvm-mirror#3 0x7c3fe9 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136
    llvm-mirror#4 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    llvm-mirror#5 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
    llvm-mirror#6 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
    llvm-mirror#7 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
    llvm-mirror#8 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
    llvm-mirror#9 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    llvm-mirror#10 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
    llvm-mirror#11 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
    llvm-mirror#12 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
    llvm-mirror#13 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)

Indirect leak of 40 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105
    llvm-mirror#1 0x151be6b in make_unique<llvm::ValueSymbolTable> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:1349:29
    llvm-mirror#2 0x151be6b in llvm::Function::Function(llvm::FunctionType*, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, unsigned int, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::Module*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/Function.cpp:241
    llvm-mirror#3 0x7c4006 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:16
    llvm-mirror#4 0x7c4006 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136
    llvm-mirror#5 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    llvm-mirror#6 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
    llvm-mirror#7 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
    llvm-mirror#8 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
    llvm-mirror#9 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
    llvm-mirror#10 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    llvm-mirror#11 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
    llvm-mirror#12 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
    llvm-mirror#13 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
    llvm-mirror#14 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 168 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
```

See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/builds/11358/steps/check-llvm%20asan/logs/stdio for more information.

Also introduces use-of-uninitialized-value in ConstantsTest.FoldGlobalVariablePtr:
```
==7070==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    #0 0x14e703c in User /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5
    llvm-mirror#1 0x14e703c in Constant /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Constant.h:44
    llvm-mirror#2 0x14e703c in llvm::GlobalValue::GlobalValue(llvm::Type*, llvm::Value::ValueTy, llvm::Use*, unsigned int, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Twine const&, unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalValue.h:78
    llvm-mirror#3 0x14e5467 in GlobalObject /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalObject.h:34:9
    llvm-mirror#4 0x14e5467 in llvm::GlobalVariable::GlobalVariable(llvm::Type*, bool, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Constant*, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::GlobalValue::ThreadLocalMode, unsigned int, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/Globals.cpp:314
    llvm-mirror#5 0x6938f1 in llvm::(anonymous namespace)::ConstantsTest_FoldGlobalVariablePtr_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantsTest.cpp:565:18
    llvm-mirror#6 0x1a240a1 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    llvm-mirror#7 0x1a240a1 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
    llvm-mirror#8 0x1a26d26 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
    llvm-mirror#9 0x1a2815f in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
    llvm-mirror#10 0x1a43de8 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
    llvm-mirror#11 0x1a42c47 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    llvm-mirror#12 0x1a42c47 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
    llvm-mirror#13 0x1a0dfba in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
    llvm-mirror#14 0x1a0dfba in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
    llvm-mirror#15 0x7f2081c412e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
    llvm-mirror#16 0x4dff49 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/unittests/IR/IRTests+0x4dff49)

SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5 in User
```

See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/30222/steps/check-llvm%20msan/logs/stdio for more information.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@355616 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dylanmckay pushed a commit to dylanmckay/llvm that referenced this pull request May 16, 2019
Currently, the type id for a derived type is computed incorrectly.
For example,
  type llvm-mirror#1: int
  type llvm-mirror#2: ptr to llvm-mirror#1

For a global variable "int *a", type llvm-mirror#1 will be attributed to variable "a".
This is due to a bug which assigns the type id of the basetype of
that derived type as the derived type's type id. This happens
to "const", "volatile", "restrict", "typedef" and "pointer" types.

This patch fixed this bug, fixed existing test cases and added
a new one focusing on pointers plus other derived types.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@356727 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2019
This patch focuses on adding additional testing for the --source switch.
For reference, the source-interleave-x86_64.ll test file has been split
into two parts - the input (shared with the other tests) and the test
itself.

Reviewed by: MaskRay, rupprecht, grimar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61996


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@361479 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2019
Looks like a MachinePipeliner algorithm problem found by
sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast.
I will backout this test first while investigating the problem to
unblock buildbot.

==49637==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address
0x614000002e08 at pc 0x000004364350 bp 0x7ffe228a3bd0 sp 0x7ffe228a3bc8
READ of size 4 at 0x614000002e08 thread T0
    #0 0x436434f in
llvm::SwingSchedulerDAG::checkValidNodeOrder(llvm::SmallVector<llvm::NodeSet,
8u> const&) const
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:3736:11
    #1 0x4342cd0 in llvm::SwingSchedulerDAG::schedule()
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:486:3
    #2 0x434042d in
llvm::MachinePipeliner::swingModuloScheduler(llvm::MachineLoop&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:385:7
    #3 0x433eb90 in
llvm::MachinePipeliner::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:207:5
    #4 0x428b7ea in
llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.cpp:73:13
    #5 0x4d1a913 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1648:27
    #6 0x4d1b192 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1685:16
    #7 0x4d1c06d in runOnModule
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1752:27
    #8 0x4d1c06d in llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1865
    #9 0xa48ca3 in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:611:8
    #10 0xa4270f in main
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:365:22
    #11 0x7fec902572e0 in __libc_start_main
(/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
    #12 0x971b69 in _start
(/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan/bin/llc+0x971b69)

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@363105 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dylanmckay pushed a commit to dylanmckay/llvm that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2019
This patch focuses on adding additional testing for the --source switch.
For reference, the source-interleave-x86_64.ll test file has been split
into two parts - the input (shared with the other tests) and the test
itself.

Reviewed by: MaskRay, rupprecht, grimar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61996


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@361479 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dylanmckay pushed a commit to dylanmckay/llvm that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2019
Looks like a MachinePipeliner algorithm problem found by
sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast.
I will backout this test first while investigating the problem to
unblock buildbot.

==49637==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address
0x614000002e08 at pc 0x000004364350 bp 0x7ffe228a3bd0 sp 0x7ffe228a3bc8
READ of size 4 at 0x614000002e08 thread T0
    #0 0x436434f in
llvm::SwingSchedulerDAG::checkValidNodeOrder(llvm::SmallVector<llvm::NodeSet,
8u> const&) const
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:3736:11
    llvm-mirror#1 0x4342cd0 in llvm::SwingSchedulerDAG::schedule()
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:486:3
    llvm-mirror#2 0x434042d in
llvm::MachinePipeliner::swingModuloScheduler(llvm::MachineLoop&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:385:7
    llvm-mirror#3 0x433eb90 in
llvm::MachinePipeliner::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:207:5
    llvm-mirror#4 0x428b7ea in
llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.cpp:73:13
    llvm-mirror#5 0x4d1a913 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1648:27
    llvm-mirror#6 0x4d1b192 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1685:16
    llvm-mirror#7 0x4d1c06d in runOnModule
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1752:27
    llvm-mirror#8 0x4d1c06d in llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1865
    llvm-mirror#9 0xa48ca3 in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:611:8
    llvm-mirror#10 0xa4270f in main
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:365:22
    llvm-mirror#11 0x7fec902572e0 in __libc_start_main
(/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
    llvm-mirror#12 0x971b69 in _start
(/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan/bin/llc+0x971b69)

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@363105 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2019
Summary:
Change the scan algorithm to use only power-of-two shifts (1, 2, 4, 8,
16, 32) instead of starting off shifting by 1, 2 and 3 and then doing
a 3-way ADD, because:

1. It simplifies the compiler a little.
2. It minimizes vgpr pressure because each instruction is now of the
   form vn = vn + vn << c.
3. It is more friendly to the DPP combiner, which currently can't
   combine into an ADD3 instruction.

Because of #2 and #3 the end result is improved from this:

  v_add_u32_dpp v4, v3, v3  row_shr:1 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf bound_ctrl:0
  v_mov_b32_dpp v5, v3  row_shr:2 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf
  v_mov_b32_dpp v1, v3  row_shr:3 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf
  v_add3_u32 v1, v4, v5, v1
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:4 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xe
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:8 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xc
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_bcast:15 row_mask:0xa bank_mask:0xf
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_bcast:31 row_mask:0xc bank_mask:0xf

To this:

  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:1 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf bound_ctrl:0
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:2 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf bound_ctrl:0
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:4 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xe
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:8 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xc
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_bcast:15 row_mask:0xa bank_mask:0xf
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_bcast:31 row_mask:0xc bank_mask:0xf

I.e. two fewer computational instructions, one extra nop where we could
schedule something else.

Reviewers: arsenm, sheredom, critson, rampitec, vpykhtin

Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64411

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@366543 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2019
Summary:
Every time PrettyPrinter::printInst is called, stdout is flushed and it makes llvm-objdump slow. This patches adds a string
buffer to prevent stdout from being flushed.

Benchmark results (./llvm-objdump-master: without this patch,  ./bin/llvm-objcopy: with this patch):

  $ hyperfine --warmup 10 './llvm-objdump-master -d ./bin/llvm-objcopy' './bin/llvm-objdump -d ./bin/llvm-objcopy'
  Benchmark #1: ./llvm-objdump-master -d ./bin/llvm-objcopy
    Time (mean ± σ):      2.230 s ±  0.050 s    [User: 1.533 s, System: 0.682 s]
    Range (min … max):    2.115 s …  2.278 s    10 runs

  Benchmark #2: ./bin/llvm-objdump -d ./bin/llvm-objcopy
    Time (mean ± σ):     386.4 ms ±  13.0 ms    [User: 376.6 ms, System: 6.1 ms]
    Range (min … max):   366.1 ms … 407.0 ms    10 runs

  Summary
    './bin/llvm-objdump -d ./bin/llvm-objcopy' ran
      5.77 ± 0.23 times faster than './llvm-objdump-master -d ./bin/llvm-objcopy'

Reviewers: alexshap, Bigcheese, jhenderson, rupprecht, grimar, MaskRay

Reviewed By: jhenderson, MaskRay

Subscribers: dexonsmith, jhenderson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, rupprecht, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64969

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@366984 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2019
…ymbol that belongs to a section with a broken sh_name"

It broke BB:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/builds/16955/steps/test/logs/stdio

Expected<T> must be checked before access or destruction.
Unchecked Expected<T> contained error:
a section [index 1] has an invalid sh_name (0xffff) offset which goes past the end of the section name string tableStack dump:
0.	Program arguments: /srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm /srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/test/tools/llvm-nm/Output/format-sysv-section.test.tmp2.o --format=sysv 
 #0 0x00000000008af7c4 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x8af7c4)
 #1 0x00000000008ad8be llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x8ad8be)
 #2 0x00000000008afbd8 SignalHandler(int) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x8afbd8)
 #3 0x00007f0a6b989730 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x12730)
 #4 0x00007f0a6b48d7bb raise (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x377bb)
 #5 0x00007f0a6b478535 abort (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x22535)
 #6 0x000000000042004b llvm::Expected<llvm::StringRef>::fatalUncheckedExpected() const (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x42004b)
 #7 0x00000000008367f5 (/sv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x8367f5)
 #8 0x0000000000817b80 llvm::object::IRObjectFile::findBitcodeInObject(llvm::object::ObjectFile const&) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x817b80)
 #9 0x0000000000838416 llvm::object::SymbolicFile::createSymbolicFile(llvm::MemoryBufferRef, llvm::file_magic, llvm::LLVMContext*) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x838416)
#10 0x00000000007f36cb llvm::object::createBinary(llvm::MemoryBufferRef, llvm::LLVMContext*) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x7f36cb)
#11 0x0000000000413123 dumpSymbolNamesFromFile(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >&) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x413123)
#12 0x0000000000412e38 main (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x412e38)
#13 0x00007f0a6b47a09b __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2409b)
#14 0x00000000004120da _start (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x4120da)
FileCheck error: '-' is empty.
FileCheck command line:  /srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/FileCheck /srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.src/test/tools/llvm-nm/format-sysv-section.test --check-prefix=ERR

--

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@370662 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2019
Summary:
This reverts commit r372204.

This change causes build bot failures under msan:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/35236/steps/check-llvm%20msan/logs/stdio:

```
FAIL: LLVM :: DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir (19531 of 33579)
******************** TEST 'LLVM :: DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/llc -O0 -start-before=livedebugvalues -filetype=obj -o - /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/llvm-dwarfdump -v - | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir
--
Exit Code: 2

Command Output (stderr):
--
==62894==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    #0 0xdfcafb in llvm::AArch64FrameLowering::resolveFrameOffsetReference(llvm::MachineFunction const&, int, bool, unsigned int&, bool, bool) const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64FrameLowering.cpp:1658:3
    #1 0xdfae8a in resolveFrameIndexReference /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64FrameLowering.cpp:1580:10
    #2 0xdfae8a in llvm::AArch64FrameLowering::getFrameIndexReference(llvm::MachineFunction const&, int, unsigned int&) const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64FrameLowering.cpp:1536
    #3 0x46642c1 in (anonymous namespace)::LiveDebugValues::extractSpillBaseRegAndOffset(llvm::MachineInstr const&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:582:21
    #4 0x4647cb3 in transferSpillOrRestoreInst /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:883:11
    #5 0x4647cb3 in process /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:1079
    #6 0x4647cb3 in (anonymous namespace)::LiveDebugValues::ExtendRanges(llvm::MachineFunction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:1361
    #7 0x463ac0e in (anonymous namespace)::LiveDebugValues::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:1415:18
    #8 0x4854ef0 in llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.cpp:73:13
    #9 0x53b0b01 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1648:27
    #10 0x53b15f6 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1685:16
    #11 0x53b298d in runOnModule /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1750:27
    #12 0x53b298d in llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1863
    #13 0x905f21 in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:601:8
    #14 0x8fdc4e in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:355:22
    #15 0x7f67673632e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
    #16 0x882369 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/llc+0x882369)

MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64FrameLowering.cpp:1658:3 in llvm::AArch64FrameLowering::resolveFrameOffsetReference(llvm::MachineFunction const&, int, bool, unsigned int&, bool, bool) const
Exiting
error: -: The file was not recognized as a valid object file
FileCheck error: '-' is empty.
FileCheck command line:  /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir
```

Reviewers: bkramer

Reviewed By: bkramer

Subscribers: sdardis, aprantl, kristof.beyls, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67710

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@372228 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
dtzWill pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2019
This test is not defined.

FAIL: LLVM-Unit :: ADT/./ADTTests/ArrayRefTest.SizeTSizedOperations (178 of 33926)
******************** TEST 'LLVM-Unit :: ADT/./ADTTests/ArrayRefTest.SizeTSizedOperations' FAILED ********************
Note: Google Test filter = ArrayRefTest.SizeTSizedOperations
[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from ArrayRefTest
[ RUN      ] ArrayRefTest.SizeTSizedOperations
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h:180:32: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 9223372036854775806 to null pointer
    #0 0x5ae8dc in llvm::ArrayRef<char>::slice(unsigned long, unsigned long) const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h:180:32
    #1 0x5ae44c in (anonymous namespace)::ArrayRefTest_SizeTSizedOperations_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/unittests/ADT/ArrayRefTest.cpp:85:3
    #2 0x928a96 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474:5
    #3 0x929793 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
    #4 0x92a152 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
    #5 0x9319d2 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
    #6 0x931416 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257:10
    #7 0x920ac3 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
    #8 0x920ac3 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50:10
    #9 0x7f66135b72e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
    #10 0x472c19 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/unittests/ADT/ADTTests+0x472c19)

SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h:180:32 in

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@374327 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants