Skip to content

Conversation

@18202781743
Copy link
Contributor

  1. Removed QObject inheritance and Q_OBJECT macro from example class
  2. Removed parent parameter from example constructor
  3. Removed unused parameters from CuteMessageLogger constructor
  4. Deleted Logger.moc include which was causing compilation warnings

These changes eliminate compiler warnings about unused parameters and
unnecessary QObject infrastructure in the logging system. The example
class doesn't actually need QObject functionality, and the moc file
inclusion was redundant since we're not using Qt's meta-object system
here.

Influence:

  1. Verify logging functionality still works as expected
  2. Check that all logger categories are properly registered
  3. Test custom class logging without QObject inheritance

fix: 移除Logger中不必要的QObject依赖

  1. 从示例类中移除QObject继承和Q_OBJECT宏
  2. 从示例构造函数中移除parent参数
  3. 移除CuteMessageLogger构造函数中未使用的参数
  4. 删除导致编译警告的Logger.moc包含

这些修改消除了关于未使用参数和不必要QObject基础设施的编译器警告。示例类
实际上不需要QObject功能,且moc文件包含是多余的,因为我们没有使用Qt的元对
象系统。

Influence:

  1. 验证日志功能是否仍按预期工作
  2. 检查所有日志类别是否正确注册
  3. 测试没有QObject继承的自定义类日志记录

1. Removed QObject inheritance and Q_OBJECT macro from example class
2. Removed parent parameter from example constructor
3. Removed unused parameters from CuteMessageLogger constructor
4. Deleted Logger.moc include which was causing compilation warnings

These changes eliminate compiler warnings about unused parameters and
unnecessary QObject infrastructure in the logging system. The example
class doesn't actually need QObject functionality, and the moc file
inclusion was redundant since we're not using Qt's meta-object system
here.

Influence:
1. Verify logging functionality still works as expected
2. Check that all logger categories are properly registered
3. Test custom class logging without QObject inheritance

fix: 移除Logger中不必要的QObject依赖

1. 从示例类中移除QObject继承和Q_OBJECT宏
2. 从示例构造函数中移除parent参数
3. 移除CuteMessageLogger构造函数中未使用的参数
4. 删除导致编译警告的Logger.moc包含

这些修改消除了关于未使用参数和不必要QObject基础设施的编译器警告。示例类
实际上不需要QObject功能,且moc文件包含是多余的,因为我们没有使用Qt的元对
象系统。

Influence:
1. 验证日志功能是否仍按预期工作
2. 检查所有日志类别是否正确注册
3. 测试没有QObject继承的自定义类日志记录
@18202781743 18202781743 requested review from BLumia and mhduiy August 18, 2025 07:33
deepin-ci-robot added a commit to linuxdeepin/dtk6log that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2025
Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtklog.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtklog#17
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

我已仔细审查了这段代码的变更,以下是关于语法逻辑、代码质量、性能和安全的改进建议:

语法逻辑分析

  1. 类继承变更

    • CustomClassQObject 的继承中移除,同时移除了 Q_OBJECT
    • 构造函数也从接受 QObject* parent 参数改为无参数构造函数
  2. CuteMessageLogger 类变更

    • 构造函数参数列表中移除了第一个参数 Logger *l 的名称
    • 移除了末尾的 #include "Logger.moc"

改进建议

  1. 语法逻辑问题

    • 移除 QObject 继承和 Q_OBJECT 宏可能导致使用信号槽的代码无法正常工作,如果类中使用了这些特性,需要重新考虑这个变更
    • 构造函数参数移除名称但保留类型,这种写法虽然合法但不推荐,应该保留有意义的参数名称以提高代码可读性
  2. 代码质量问题

    • 文档示例中的代码变更可能与实际使用不匹配,建议确保示例代码与实际用法一致
    • 移除 Logger.moc 包含可能导致使用信号槽的代码无法正常编译,如果类中使用了 Q_OBJECT 宏,这个包含是必要的
  3. 性能考虑

    • 此变更对性能影响不大,但移除 QObject 继承可能会影响对象模型相关的操作性能
  4. 安全问题

    • 如果 CustomClass 原本依赖于 QObject 的内存管理机制,移除后可能导致内存泄漏或双重释放
    • 确保移除 QObject 继承后,类的生命周期管理仍然正确

具体建议

  1. 关于 CustomClass 继承

    • 如果确实不需要 QObject 功能,可以移除,但需要确保:
      • 没有使用任何信号槽机制
      • 没有使用 Qt 的元对象系统
      • 内存管理方式已相应调整
  2. 关于 CuteMessageLogger 构造函数

    // 建议保留参数名称
    Q_DECL_CONSTEXPR CuteMessageLogger(Logger *logger, Logger::LogLevel level, 
                                      const char *file, int line, 
                                      const char *func, const char *msg)
  3. 关于 Logger.moc

    • 只有当类中确实不再使用 Q_OBJECT 宏时,才应该移除 #include "Logger.moc"
    • 如果保留了 Q_OBJECT 宏,必须包含对应的 .moc 文件
  4. 文档更新

    • 更新示例代码,确保与实际实现保持一致
    • 添加关于类不再继承 QObject 的说明,以避免混淆

总的来说,这个变更看起来是为了简化类结构,但需要谨慎处理,确保不会破坏现有功能或引入新的问题。建议在实施此类变更前,进行全面测试以验证所有功能仍然正常工作。

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 18202781743, mhduiy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@18202781743 18202781743 merged commit 368ecd5 into linuxdeepin:master Aug 18, 2025
11 checks passed
18202781743 pushed a commit to linuxdeepin/dtk6log that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2025
Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtklog.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtklog#17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants