-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Refactor routes test processor setup #95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Reviewer's GuideThis PR refactors tests by deriving Clone and Copy for the LengthPrefixedProcessor, introducing a default_processor helper, and updating the routes tests to reuse a single processor instance rather than instantiating it inline. Class diagram for LengthPrefixedProcessor changesclassDiagram
class LengthPrefixedProcessor {
+LengthFormat format
<<Clone>>
<<Copy>>
<<Debug>>
}
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce trait derivations ( Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @leynos - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Individual Comments
### Comment 1
<location> `src/frame.rs:193` </location>
<code_context>
}
/// Simple length-prefixed framing using a configurable length prefix.
+#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug)]
pub struct LengthPrefixedProcessor {
format: LengthFormat,
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
Attributes should be placed after the doc comment, not before.
The #[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug)] attribute should be placed after the doc comment for LengthPrefixedProcessor to comply with the style guide.
</issue_to_address>
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
} | ||
|
||
/// Simple length-prefixed framing using a configurable length prefix. | ||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug)] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
issue (review_instructions): Attributes should be placed after the doc comment, not before.
The #[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug)] attribute should be placed after the doc comment for LengthPrefixedProcessor to comply with the style guide.
Review instructions:
Path patterns: **/*.rs
Instructions:
Ensure that function attributes are placed AFTER the function doc comment
Summary
Clone
andCopy
forLengthPrefixedProcessor
default_processor
helper for testsroutes
testTesting
make lint
make test
https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68559682e6308322855677dd8beb9990
Summary by Sourcery
Refactor routes tests to share a default LengthPrefixedProcessor instance by introducing a default_processor helper and deriving Clone and Copy for LengthPrefixedProcessor.
New Features:
Enhancements:
Tests:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Tests