Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Branch coverage #31

Closed
myint opened this issue Apr 6, 2013 · 20 comments
Closed

Branch coverage #31

myint opened this issue Apr 6, 2013 · 20 comments

Comments

@myint
Copy link

myint commented Apr 6, 2013

Does Coveralls support branch coverage? (See example.) I know Coveralls supports "hits per line", but that alone does not really tell you if the tests have covered both branches of a conditional.

@treyhunner
Copy link

👍 I'm not yet using Coveralls on my closed source projects because it doesn't measure branch coverage so I still have to run all of my coverage reports locally.

Anything we can do to push this feature up in the priority queue? I'd gladly beta test such a feature.

@armisael
Copy link

armisael commented Feb 6, 2014

Any news about this? I would love to see branch coverage in my repos..

@robdennis
Copy link

Adding my vote to this. I'd definitely use it :)

@yasuhito
Copy link

+1

@jantman
Copy link

jantman commented Jun 20, 2014

No updates on this? I'd actually been relying on the "100% coverage" reports from coveralls, and only just now happened to look at the actual cov output and see that I have a bunch of missed branches...

@treyhunner
Copy link

I second @jantman sentiment.

As long as the programming languages I use can have if statements without else clauses, my code coverage will almost always require branch coverage to be a complete picture.

@daira
Copy link

daira commented Sep 9, 2014

#216 is possibly a duplicate.

@bayandin
Copy link

👍 for it

@xanderdunn
Copy link

+1 This would be amazing.

@mrname
Copy link

mrname commented Sep 29, 2015

Kind of surprised that this has been sitting dormant for two years. Are there any plans to implement this at all in the future?

@josepedrocorreia
Copy link

The lack of branch coverage statistics in coveralls.io made me switch to codecov.io. I like your interface more though, so please fix this issue so I can come back ;)

@tvavrys
Copy link

tvavrys commented May 11, 2016

👍 +1

@DimmuR
Copy link

DimmuR commented May 11, 2016

👍

@abendebury
Copy link

abendebury commented Jul 19, 2016

+1, switching to codecov.io for now

@epoberezkin
Copy link

+1

@jcubic
Copy link

jcubic commented Jan 21, 2017

It seems that there is branch coverage. For my project jQuery Terminal:

Master Coverage Status

Devel Coverage Status

@Peque
Copy link

Peque commented Jan 21, 2017

@kasperlewau
Copy link

Looks to me like Coveralls is now doing branch coverage. Had a 2.5% drop today upon merging into master.

screenie

@nickmerwin
Copy link
Member

Hey @kasperlewau, yes! We quietly released it over the weekend and are watching for issues before making a wider announcement.

Let me know if you come across anything fishy. Thanks!

@Pr0methean
Copy link

@kasperlewau I still don't see it at https://coveralls.io/github/Pr0methean/BetterRandom. Is Java supported for branch coverage yet?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests