Repository navigation
docs(lastcode): preserve documentation-site research - #304
Conversation
Archive the approved research and prototypes with historical labels and issue ownership so the working thread can be closed while release work remains deferred. Carry-Group: tooling Carry-Observation: Maintainer requested preservation of documentation-site research before archiving the thread; media work remains deferred. Carry-Evidence: #122
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
@codex review |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
GitHub's Codex code-review service reported that its review quota is exhausted for this PR. An independent local Codex reviewer is reviewing head The required GitHub CI gate still applies. The local Quick CI Action and pre-push hook both explicitly deferred to GitHub because local capacity was busy. |
|
Independent local Codex review completed for head Result: clean, with no meaningful findings. The reviewer confirmed that all nine research snapshots are preserved, historical proposals are labelled, the index separates delivered work from unfinished release requirements, and the missing media and deferred approvals are recorded. No product changes or private deployment details were found. Reviewer: gpt-6.1-sol through the Codex harness, in a separate read-only delegated task. The reviewer ran no validation or mutation commands. This is a local Codex review, not a GitHub bot review; the GitHub review service reported an exhausted quota. The reviewer did not establish CI success or independently query every historical issue status. GitHub CI, deferred site interaction QA, and eventual media approval retain their separate requirements. |
|
The failed The exact failing scenario passed locally without source changes: I retried only the failed GitHub job. This is evidence of a possible intermittent test failure, not proof that CI has passed; the required GitHub checks remain the merge gate. |
1 participant
The documentation-site research lived only in ignored working files, leaving the design decisions and unfinished commitments dependent on this conversation.
Preserve all nine research artifacts under
docs/lastcode/documentation-site-research/, label the proposals as historical, and add an index distinguishing merged work from the unfinished release. This is the maintainer-requested exception to the repository's usual rule against committing research notes.Media work remains deferred under #161. Existing issues #162–#165 own validation, upkeep, deployment, and README activation. #303 records the previously uncovered permission-prompt investigation. Deferred site QA and docs Action setup are carried into the existing release issues.
Validation: focused formatting and whitespace checks pass; relative Markdown links resolve; the archived prototype's script parses; the public-data scan passes. No product code or published site changes.
Model: gpt-6.1-sol. Harness: Codex in T3 Code.