[5.8] Fix formatting of DocBlock in factory.stub #29199
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks |
|
@RikSomers Hey, look at that! I just noticed it was not correctly highlighted in my editor and thought that if it's already there it might as well be formatted right. |
GrahamCampbell
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change allows all IDEs to properly parse the imported variable.
Before it was invalid because a DocBlock should always start with
/**(two asterisks), and the syntax for@varwas in the wrong order.It's a non-breaking change because we're just updating a comment, and it will only benefit users who generate factories after the PR is merged.