Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOCS]Minkube in a container #3244

Closed
bhack opened this issue Oct 10, 2018 · 7 comments
Closed

[DOCS]Minkube in a container #3244

bhack opened this issue Oct 10, 2018 · 7 comments
Labels
help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done.

Comments

@bhack
Copy link

bhack commented Oct 10, 2018

Do we have any doc related to installing Minkube in a container?

See https://aspenmesh.io/2018/01/building-istio-with-minikube-in-a-container-and-jenkins/

@bhack
Copy link
Author

bhack commented Oct 10, 2018

Probably it could be improved running in https://github.com/google/gvisor instead of Docker? But I don't know how mature it is.

@bhack
Copy link
Author

bhack commented Oct 10, 2018

Partially related to #2602

@tstromberg tstromberg added the kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. label Oct 11, 2018
@bhack
Copy link
Author

bhack commented Oct 11, 2018

I don't know how this could overlap with https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubeadm-dind-cluster

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 9, 2019
@tstromberg tstromberg added priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done. help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. labels Jan 23, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 23, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants