Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OpenVINO model optimizer component and example pipeline #178

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 16, 2018

Conversation

dtrawins
Copy link
Contributor

@dtrawins dtrawins commented Nov 9, 2018

This change is Reviewable

@googlebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project (if not, look below for help). Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed (or fixed any issues), please reply here (e.g. I signed it!) and we'll verify it.


What to do if you already signed the CLA

Individual signers
Corporate signers

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @dtrawins. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubeflow member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

1 similar comment
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @dtrawins. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubeflow member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 9, 2018

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 152

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 67.592%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 151: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1535
Relevant Lines: 2179

💛 - Coveralls

@vicaire
Copy link
Contributor

vicaire commented Nov 10, 2018

Hi @dtrawins,

The comments from one of the robots above provide details instructions on how to pass the CLA check.

See the comment starting with:

"Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project (if not, look below for help). Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA)."

Thanks!

@dtrawins
Copy link
Contributor Author

I should be now in the required CLA group. Could you revalidate it now?

@googlebot
Copy link
Collaborator

CLAs look good, thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@vicaire vicaire left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me. Could you please just move the component to /contrib/components/openvino

Thanks!

@@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
# Model optimization component
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be possible to move the code to /contrib/components/openvino?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure, moved according to this suggestion

@vicaire
Copy link
Contributor

vicaire commented Nov 16, 2018

/retest

Copy link
Contributor

@vicaire vicaire left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, there seems to be two more files in the /sample directory, could we move them to the /contrib directory? Thanks!

This is an example of a one step pipeline implementation of model optimization using OpenVINO toolkit

It performs graph optimization and generates Intermediate Representation model format which can be used
later by the Inference Engine.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file is still in the /samples directory. Could we move it to the /contrib directory?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

samples are now also moved to contrib

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@

import kfp.dsl as dsl
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file is still in the /samples directory. Could we move it to the /contrib directory?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

samples are now also moved to contrib

@vicaire
Copy link
Contributor

vicaire commented Nov 16, 2018

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vicaire

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

1 similar comment
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vicaire

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@vicaire
Copy link
Contributor

vicaire commented Nov 16, 2018

Bypassing the e2e tests since they are not affected by these changes.

@vicaire vicaire merged commit ce67707 into kubeflow:master Nov 16, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dtrawins: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
build-image 11d8dac link /test build-image
presubmit-unit-test 11d8dac link /test presubmit-unit-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Linchin pushed a commit to Linchin/pipelines that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
* We want to set the resource type to container because we are interested in
  container logs.
magdalenakuhn17 pushed a commit to magdalenakuhn17/pipelines that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2023
* Add developer guide

* Add TF protos

* Update Developer Guide with env vars

* Change dir name for generated TF protos

* Generate protos in tmp instead of vendor
HumairAK pushed a commit to red-hat-data-services/data-science-pipelines that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
* Remove randomness from condition example

* Add forced results instead of completely removing randomness

* Fix lint errors

* Fix unit test
HumairAK added a commit to red-hat-data-services/data-science-pipelines that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants