update ark and runtime version #52
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to several Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 21
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (20)
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/README-zh_CN.md (2)
9-9: Format the bare URL as a Markdown link.Convert the bare URL to a proper Markdown link for better readability and to follow Markdown best practices.
-注意需要本地安装 maven，且版本大于 3.9.0，由于 skywalking 不支持单个进程设置多个 service_name，参考 skywalking 官方回复 https://github.com/apache/skywalking/discussions/9373 , 所以更换方式将不同模块日志打印到不同目录来实现，可以通过采集不同目录日志来实现多模块的 tracing，模块独立目录打印的可以参考 Koupleless 的 [logging samples](https://github.com/koupleless/samples/tree/main/springboot-samples/logging) 工程，本 samples 只是展示简单的 log 配置方式并提供快速试跑查看效果的 demo。 +注意需要本地安装 maven，且版本大于 3.9.0，由于 skywalking 不支持单个进程设置多个 service_name，参考 [skywalking 官方回复](https://github.com/apache/skywalking/discussions/9373) , 所以更换方式将不同模块日志打印到不同目录来实现，可以通过采集不同目录日志来实现多模块的 tracing，模块独立目录打印的可以参考 Koupleless 的 [logging samples](https://github.com/koupleless/samples/tree/main/springboot-samples/logging) 工程，本 samples 只是展示简单的 log 配置方式并提供快速试跑查看效果的 demo。🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
9-9: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
14-15: Enhance verification steps with specific examples.The current verification instructions could be more detailed. Consider adding specific examples of what users should look for in the tracing logs and where exactly these directories are located.
Add more specific verification steps, for example:
## 验证效果 -只要看到不同模块 tracing 相关日志打印到不同的目录里即可 +只要看到不同模块 tracing 相关日志打印到不同的目录里即可。例如： + +1. 检查 `module-a/logs/trace` 目录中的日志文件 +2. 检查 `module-b/logs/trace` 目录中的日志文件 +3. 确认每个日志文件中包含相应模块的 tracing 信息springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/base/facade/SampleService.java (1)
21-24: Enhance method documentation.The current documentation "a simple facade" could be more descriptive. Consider adding:
- Purpose of the service
- Expected behavior
- Return value description
/** - * a simple facade - * @return + * Provides a basic service interface for demonstration purposes. + * This interface serves as a facade for underlying service implementations + * in the Skywalking tracing sample. + * + * @return A string response from the service implementation */springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/src/main/resources/log4j2-spring.xml (1)
5-5: Consider enhancing log pattern for better traceability.The current pattern includes basic information but could be enhanced for better debugging and monitoring.
Consider adding thread name and MDC properties:
- <PatternLayout pattern="%d [%sw_ctx] %-5p %c{1}:%L - %m%n"/> + <PatternLayout pattern="%d [%sw_ctx] [%t] %-5p %c{1}:%L - %X{requestId}%X{userId} - %m%n"/>Also applies to: 12-12
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/README.md (3)
7-8: Enhance the documentation structure and formatting.While the content is informative, there are a few improvements needed:
- Add a comma after "Please note that"
- The bare URL should be properly formatted as a markdown link
Apply these changes:
-# How to Collect Tracing for Each Module -Please note that Maven must be installed locally, with a version greater than 3.9.0. Since SkyWalking does not support setting multiple service_names for a single process (refer to the official SkyWalking response at https://github.com/apache/skywalking/discussions/9373), we will use a different approach +# How to Collect Tracing for Each Module +Please note that, Maven must be installed locally, with a version greater than 3.9.0. Since SkyWalking does not support setting multiple service_names for a single process (refer to the official SkyWalking response [here](https://github.com/apache/skywalking/discussions/9373)), we will use a different approach🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[typographical] ~7-~7: Consider adding a comma here.
Context: ...# How to Collect Tracing for Each Module Please note that Maven must be installed local...(PLEASE_COMMA)
🪛 Markdownlint
8-8: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
13-14: Enhance verification instructions.The verification steps could be more detailed to help users confirm successful implementation.
Consider adding:
- Expected log file locations
- Example log entries to look for
- Troubleshooting steps if logs aren't appearing as expected
## Verify the Effects -You just need to see that the tracing-related logs from different modules are printed to different directories. +You just need to see that the tracing-related logs from different modules are printed to different directories: + +1. Check the following directories for module-specific logs: + - Base module: `./base-skywalking/logs/` + - Biz1 module: `./biz1-skywalking/logs/` + +2. Verify that tracing information appears in the logs + +If logs are not appearing in the expected locations, ensure: +- The application is running with the correct configuration +- Log levels are set appropriately +- File permissions allow writing to the log directories
1-14: Consider enhancing documentation with additional sections.While the current documentation covers the basics, consider adding these sections to make it more comprehensive:
- Version Compatibility Matrix (SkyWalking, Spring Boot, JDK versions)
- Security Considerations (especially regarding log file permissions and sensitive data in traces)
- Performance Impact and Recommendations
- Troubleshooting Guide
Would you like assistance in drafting these additional sections?
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[typographical] ~7-~7: Consider adding a comma here.
Context: ...# How to Collect Tracing for Each Module Please note that Maven must be installed local...(PLEASE_COMMA)
[typographical] ~10-~10: Consider adding a comma here.
Context: ...ffects. ## Build and Install the Module Please refer to the [official quick start guid...(PLEASE_COMMA)
🪛 Markdownlint
8-8: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/biz2/Biz2Application.java (1)
27-27: Consider adding the 'final' modifier to the logger.Since the logger is static and follows constant naming convention (uppercase), it should be declared as final.
- private static Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Biz2Application.class); + private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Biz2Application.class);springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/base/impl/SampleServiceImpl.java (1)
1-40: Add documentation for tracing functionality.As this is a sample implementation, it would be beneficial to include documentation explaining the tracing features being demonstrated.
Add Javadoc comments to explain:
- The purpose of this sample
- How tracing is implemented
- What tracing features are being demonstrated
- Expected trace output
+/** + * Sample service implementation demonstrating Skywalking tracing integration. + * + * This sample shows: + * - Automatic trace context propagation + * - Manual span creation and management + * - Error handling in distributed tracing + * - Adding custom tags and logs to spans + * + * Expected trace output will include: + * - Service entry span + * - Custom operation span with app name tag + * - Error details in case of failures + */ @Service public class SampleServiceImpl implements SampleService {springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/base/BaseApplication.java (1)
25-27: Consider renaming the logger field to follow Java conventions.The
LOGGERfield should be lowercase as it's not a constant (final) field. While this won't affect functionality, following standard Java naming conventions improves code consistency.- private static Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(BaseApplication.class); + private static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(BaseApplication.class);springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/biz1/rest/SampleController.java (1)
27-27: Add class-level documentation explaining the tracing sample.As this is a sample application demonstrating Skywalking integration, consider adding comprehensive JavaDoc explaining:
- The purpose of this sample
- Key tracing concepts demonstrated
- How to observe the traces in Skywalking UI
Add this documentation before the class declaration:
/** * Sample REST controller demonstrating Skywalking distributed tracing capabilities. * This sample shows: * - Automatic trace context propagation * - Manual trace enhancement using Skywalking API * - Error handling in traces * - Custom span tags and logging * * To observe traces: * 1. Start the application with Skywalking agent * 2. Access the endpoint: GET / * 3. View traces in Skywalking UI */springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/pom.xml (3)
11-13: Consider version inheritance from parent POM.The version number is redundantly specified and matches the parent version. Since this is a module within the parent project, you can remove the
<version>element to inherit it from the parent POM, making version management easier.<groupId>com.alipay.sofa.tracing.skywalking</groupId> <artifactId>biz1-skywalking</artifactId> - <version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
40-46: Improve dependency version management and documentation.
- The Skywalking version should be managed through properties to ensure consistency across modules:
- The comment should be in English for better international collaboration.
- <!-- Sky walking 日志收集, 版本号要和当前使用的Skywalking保持一直 --> + <!-- Skywalking log collection toolkit - version must match the Skywalking agent version --> <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.skywalking</groupId> <artifactId>apm-toolkit-log4j-2.x</artifactId> - <version>9.3.0</version> + <version>${skywalking.version}</version> <scope>provided</scope> </dependency>Add to properties section:
<properties> <skywalking.version>9.3.0</skywalking.version> </properties>
69-71: Improve configuration documentation.The commented section about static deployment could be more descriptive. Consider updating it to provide clearer guidance:
- <!-- 打包、安装和发布 ark biz--> - <!-- 静态合并部署需要配置--> - <!-- <attach>true</attach>--> + <!-- For static merged deployment: + 1. Uncomment and set attach=true + 2. This will package, install, and publish the ark biz + <attach>true</attach> + -->springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/pom.xml (2)
1-14: Add project description and name tags for better documentation.Consider adding
<name>and<description>tags to provide more context about this module's purpose within the Skywalking samples.<artifactId>biz2-skywalking</artifactId> <version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version> + <name>SOFABoot Samples - Tracing Skywalking Biz2</name> + <description>A sample module demonstrating Skywalking integration in a modular Spring Boot application</description>
40-46: Improve version management and documentation.
- Consider moving the Skywalking version to a property for better version management:
+ <properties> + <skywalking.version>9.3.0</skywalking.version> + </properties> <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.skywalking</groupId> <artifactId>apm-toolkit-log4j-2.x</artifactId> - <version>9.3.0</version> + <version>${skywalking.version}</version> <scope>provided</scope> </dependency>
- Consider translating the Chinese comment to English for better international collaboration:
- <!-- Sky walking 日志收集, 版本号要和当前使用的Skywalking保持一直 --> + <!-- Skywalking log collection - version must match the Skywalking agent version in use -->springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/pom.xml (1)
17-21: Standardize comments to EnglishFor better international collaboration, consider using only English in comments.
- <!-- 这里添加动态模块相关依赖 --> + <!-- Add dynamic module related dependencies here -->springboot-samples/pom.xml (1)
Line range hint
26-26: Fix typo in maven.gpg.plugin property name.There's a typo in the property name:
maven.gpg.pluignshould bemaven.gpg.plugin.Apply this fix:
- <maven.gpg.pluign>1.6</maven.gpg.pluign> + <maven.gpg.plugin>1.6</maven.gpg.plugin>springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/Formatter.xml (1)
197-197: Consider increasing the line length limit.The maximum line length is set to 80 characters, which might be too restrictive for modern wide-screen displays. Consider increasing it to 100-120 characters for better readability while maintaining reasonable line lengths.
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/Formatter.xml (1)
1-2: Add XML declaration and schema reference.The XML file is missing standard XML declaration and schema reference. Consider adding them for better IDE support and validation.
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> +<!DOCTYPE profiles SYSTEM "http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/profiles.dtd"> <profiles version="11"> <profile kind="CodeFormatterProfile" name="Alipay Convention" version="11">
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (29)
- springboot-samples/pom.xml (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/Formatter.xml (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/HEADER (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/README-zh_CN.md (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/README.md (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/Formatter.xml (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/HEADER (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/pom.xml (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/base/BaseApplication.java (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/base/facade/SampleService.java (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/base/impl/SampleServiceImpl.java (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/base/rest/SampleController.java (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/resources/application.properties (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/resources/log4j2-spring.xml (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/Formatter.xml (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/HEADER (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/pom.xml (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/biz1/Biz1Application.java (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/biz1/rest/SampleController.java (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/src/main/resources/application.properties (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/src/main/resources/log4j2-spring.xml (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/Formatter.xml (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/HEADER (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/pom.xml (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/biz2/Biz2Application.java (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/biz2/rest/SampleController.java (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/src/main/resources/application.properties (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/src/main/resources/log4j2-spring.xml (1 hunks)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/pom.xml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (12)
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/HEADER
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/Formatter.xml
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/HEADER
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/resources/application.properties
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/resources/log4j2-spring.xml
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/Formatter.xml
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/HEADER
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/src/main/resources/application.properties
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/HEADER
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/src/main/resources/application.properties
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/src/main/resources/log4j2-spring.xml
- springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/pom.xml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/README-zh_CN.md
9-9: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/README.md
8-8: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
🪛 LanguageTool
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/README.md
[typographical] ~7-~7: Consider adding a comma here.
Context: ...# How to Collect Tracing for Each Module Please note that Maven must be installed local...(PLEASE_COMMA)
[typographical] ~10-~10: Consider adding a comma here.
Context: ...ffects. ## Build and Install the Module Please refer to the [official quick start guid...(PLEASE_COMMA)
🔇 Additional comments (26)
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/base/facade/SampleService.java (1)
19-26: LGTM! Clean and well-structured interface.The interface follows good practices:
- Clear naming convention
- Single responsibility principle
- Public visibility appropriate for a facade
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/src/main/resources/log4j2-spring.xml (1)
8-9: Verify context variable initialization.The configuration uses context variables (
${ctx:logging.file.path}and${ctx:spring.application.name}) which must be properly initialized before logging starts. Ensure these properties are set in your application.properties/yaml:logging.file.path=/path/to/logs spring.application.name=your-app-name✅ Verification successful
Context variables are properly configured
The required properties are correctly set in the application.properties file for the biz1-skywalking module:
spring.application.name=biz1 logging.file.path=./springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/logs/The log4j2 configuration will work as expected since both context variables are properly initialized.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the required properties are defined in application properties rg -l "logging\.file\.path|spring\.application\.name" --type propertiesLength of output: 108
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for application properties in both .properties and .yml/.yaml files fd -e properties -e yml -e yaml | xargs rg -l "logging\.file\.path|spring\.application\.name" # Also check if these properties might be set programmatically in Java files rg -t java "logging\.file\.path|spring\.application\.name" -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 47593
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/README.md (2)
1-6: LGTM! Well-structured header with language options.The header section is properly formatted with clear language navigation options.
8-9: Verify the referenced logging samples.The documentation references external samples. Let's verify their existence and accessibility.
✅ Verification successful
The referenced logging samples are accessible and valid
The logging samples URL (https://github.com/koupleless/samples/tree/main/springboot-samples/logging) is accessible and returns a 200 HTTP status code, confirming that the documentation references a valid external resource.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of referenced logging samples # Test: Check if the logging samples URL is accessible curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://github.com/koupleless/samples/tree/main/springboot-samples/loggingLength of output: 119
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
8-8: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/biz1/Biz1Application.java (2)
1-22: LGTM! License header and package structure are well-organized.The file includes proper licensing and follows Java package naming conventions.
24-37: Verify Skywalking agent and logging integration setup.Since this is part of a Skywalking tracing sample, please ensure:
- Skywalking agent configuration is properly set up
- Logging framework is integrated with Skywalking for trace context
Let's verify the configuration:
✅ Verification successful
Let's examine the actual configuration content to verify the setup:
Let's check the log4j2 configuration since it's referenced in the properties:
Skywalking integration is properly configured
The verification confirms proper Skywalking setup:
- Skywalking Log4j2 toolkit dependency is correctly included (apm-toolkit-log4j-2.x v9.3.0)
- Log4j2 configuration includes Skywalking trace context (%sw_ctx) in the pattern layout
- Application properties has necessary logging configurations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for Skywalking agent configuration echo "Checking for Skywalking agent configuration..." fd -e yml -e yaml -e properties | xargs rg -l 'skywalking|sw.agent' # Check for Skywalking logging integration echo "Checking for Skywalking logging configuration..." fd -e xml | xargs rg -l 'apm-toolkit-log4j|apm-toolkit-logback'Length of output: 819
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Skywalking agent configuration in properties files echo "=== Skywalking Properties Configuration ===" cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/src/main/resources/application.properties # Check Skywalking logging dependencies in pom.xml echo -e "\n=== Skywalking Dependencies in pom.xml ===" cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/pom.xml | grep -A 5 -B 5 'apm-toolkit'Length of output: 1077
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check log4j2 configuration for Skywalking integration echo "=== Log4j2 Configuration ===" cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/src/main/resources/log4j2-spring.xml # Check for any additional Skywalking configuration files echo -e "\n=== Additional Skywalking Config Files ===" fd -e yml -e yaml -e properties -e xml -e conf | xargs rg -l "skywalking|sw.agent|apm.toolkit"Length of output: 1882
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/biz2/Biz2Application.java (2)
1-17: LGTM! License header and package declaration are correct.
24-38: Verify Skywalking configuration.Since this is part of a Skywalking tracing module, please ensure that:
- Required Skywalking dependencies are configured in the module's pom.xml
- Necessary Skywalking agent configuration is documented
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/base/impl/SampleServiceImpl.java (2)
26-31: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider adding explicit tracing configuration.
As this is a Skywalking tracing sample, consider adding explicit tracing annotations or configurations to demonstrate tracing capabilities.
Add the following to better demonstrate tracing:
@Service +@TracingEnable // Enable tracing for this service public class SampleServiceImpl implements SampleService { private static Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(SampleServiceImpl.class); @Autowired private ApplicationContext applicationContext; + @Autowired + private SkywalkingTracer tracer; // Inject tracer for explicit span creationLikely invalid or redundant comment.
19-19: Verify the complete tracing setup.Let's verify the integration with other components and proper setup of dependencies.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional verification scripts to check the specific implementation and configuration details:
This will help us verify:
- The actual interface definition
- The implementation details including any tracing annotations
- The Skywalking configuration properties
- The specific Skywalking dependencies being used
Let me generate one final verification to check the log4j2 configuration since it's referenced in both the properties and pom.xml:
This will help us verify the complete tracing setup including the logging configuration that integrates with Skywalking.
Tracing setup is properly configured but requires agent installation
The code integration for Skywalking tracing is correctly set up with:
- Proper SampleService interface and implementation
- Skywalking log4j2 integration with
%sw_ctxpattern- Required dependencies including
apm-toolkit-log4j-2.xHowever, for complete tracing functionality:
- Ensure Skywalking agent is installed and configured in your deployment environment
- Add
-javaagent:/path/to/skywalking-agent.jarto JVM arguments🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the complete tracing setup and integration # Check if SampleService interface exists echo "Checking for SampleService interface..." fd -e java "SampleService.java" # Check for controller using this service echo "Checking for controllers using SampleService..." rg -l "SampleService" --type java # Check for Skywalking dependencies in pom.xml echo "Checking for Skywalking dependencies..." fd -e xml "pom.xml" --exec grep -l "skywalking" # Check for tracing configuration echo "Checking for tracing configuration..." fd -e properties -e yaml -e yml | xargs grep -l "skywalking"Length of output: 8805
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the SampleService interface implementation in the skywalking module echo "Checking SampleService interface in skywalking module..." cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/base/facade/SampleService.java echo "Checking SampleServiceImpl implementation..." cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/base/impl/SampleServiceImpl.java echo "Checking Skywalking configuration..." cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/resources/application.properties echo "Checking Skywalking dependencies in pom.xml..." cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/pom.xmlLength of output: 8193
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the log4j2 configuration for Skywalking integration echo "Checking log4j2-spring.xml configuration..." cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/resources/log4j2-spring.xml # Check parent pom for additional Skywalking dependencies echo "Checking parent pom.xml for Skywalking dependencies..." cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/pom.xmlLength of output: 2321
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/base/BaseApplication.java (2)
1-24: LGTM! Well-structured package and imports.The license header is properly included, and the package structure follows Java conventions.
29-35: Verify Skywalking agent configuration and enhance the sample.While the base setup is correct, consider the following improvements for a Skywalking sample:
- Ensure Skywalking agent configuration is documented
- Add example of how to create and use Skywalking spans
- Remove or document the purpose of logging the classloader information
Let's verify if Skywalking configuration exists:
Consider adding comments or documentation about:
- Required JVM arguments for Skywalking agent
- Expected tracing behavior
- Sample endpoints that demonstrate tracing
✅ Verification successful
Based on the review comment and the code context, I'll generate a final response to verify the Skywalking configuration concern.
Skywalking configuration is properly documented and implemented
The base application already has the necessary Skywalking configuration:
- The agent configuration is documented in the README.md, which explains how to use Skywalking for tracing.
- The logging configuration is properly set up to output logs to different directories for each module, which allows for separate tracing collection.
- The module's logging configuration inherits from the base, ensuring consistent tracing across the application.
No additional configuration is needed as the current setup follows the recommended practice of using log-based tracing for multi-module applications, as per Skywalking's official guidance for scenarios where agent-based tracing is not feasible.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for Skywalking configuration files and agent setup echo "Checking for Skywalking configuration..." fd -e yml -e yaml -e properties | rg -i 'skywalking|agent' # Check for Skywalking dependencies in pom.xml echo "Checking for Skywalking dependencies..." fd pom.xml --exec rg -l 'skywalking'Length of output: 834
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check content of application.properties files echo "Content of base-skywalking application.properties:" cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/resources/application.properties echo -e "\nChecking Skywalking dependencies in base-skywalking pom.xml:" cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/pom.xml | rg -A 5 -B 5 'skywalking' # Check for any Skywalking instrumentation or usage in the codebase echo -e "\nChecking for Skywalking usage in code:" rg -l "import.*skywalking" # Check for any README or documentation echo -e "\nChecking for documentation:" fd README -e md | xargs catLength of output: 404719
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/biz2/rest/SampleController.java (1)
1-40: Verify integration with other Skywalking components.Please ensure this controller properly integrates with other components in the tracing sample.
Let's verify the integration:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the Skywalking integration in this module.
Let me check one more aspect to verify the integration setup.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
The SampleController is properly integrated with Skywalking
The controller is correctly set up for tracing with Skywalking as evidenced by:
- The module includes Skywalking APM toolkit dependency (
apm-toolkit-log4j-2.x)- Log4j2 configuration includes Skywalking context (
%sw_ctx) in the pattern layout- Application name and logging configurations are properly defined
- The simple REST endpoint will be automatically traced by Skywalking's agent instrumentation without requiring explicit annotations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other controllers and services that this might interact with echo "Checking for related components..." rg -t java "SampleController|SampleService" --type-add 'java:*.java' # Check for Skywalking agent configuration echo "Checking for Skywalking agent configuration..." fd -e yml -e yaml -e properties | xargs rg "skywalking|sw.agent"Length of output: 36191
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for Skywalking agent configuration in the specific module echo "Checking for Skywalking configuration in biz2-skywalking module..." rg -t properties -t yaml -t yml "skywalking|sw.agent|spring.application.name" springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/ # Check for other tracing-related dependencies and configurations echo "Checking for tracing dependencies..." fd pom.xml -p springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/ | xargs rg "skywalking|tracing|apm" # Check for any tracing annotations or instrumentation echo "Checking for tracing instrumentation..." rg -t java "@Trace|@Tag|@Tags|@Component|@SpanTag" springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/Length of output: 1064
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for the complete application configuration and dependencies echo "Checking application configuration..." find springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/src/main/resources -type f -exec cat {} \; # Check parent pom for tracing configuration echo "Checking parent pom configuration..." cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/pom.xmlLength of output: 2632
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/tracing/base/rest/SampleController.java (3)
1-17: LGTM: License header and package declaration are properly structured.
19-26: LGTM: All imports are necessary and properly organized.
1-46: Verify Skywalking tracing configuration.Since this controller is part of a Skywalking tracing sample, ensure that:
- Skywalking agent is properly configured in the application startup
- Necessary tracing dependencies are included in the project's POM file
- Consider adding explicit tracing annotations if fine-grained control is needed
✅ Verification successful
Skywalking tracing configuration requires manual agent setup
Based on the verification results:
- The project includes the required Skywalking log4j2 toolkit dependency (
apm-toolkit-log4j2.x) and log pattern (%sw_ctx)- The README indicates that Skywalking agent must be configured manually during application startup
- No explicit agent configuration is present in the codebase as it's an environment-specific setup
The current implementation is correct as:
- Log collection is properly configured through log4j2
- Agent setup is intentionally left as a deployment concern
- The code follows Skywalking's recommended practice for multi-module tracing
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for Skywalking agent configuration and dependencies echo "Checking for Skywalking configuration..." rg -l "skywalking" --type xml rg -l "apm-toolkit" --type xml rg -l "agent.service_name" --type propertiesLength of output: 676
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual Skywalking dependencies and configuration in the relevant pom files echo "Checking Skywalking dependencies in base-skywalking/pom.xml..." cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/pom.xml echo -e "\nChecking for application properties/yaml files..." fd -e properties -e yml -e yaml . springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/ echo -e "\nChecking for agent configuration in startup scripts..." fd -e sh -e bat . springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/Length of output: 5201
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the parent pom for Skywalking agent configuration and check application properties echo "Checking parent pom.xml for Skywalking configuration..." cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/pom.xml echo -e "\nChecking application.properties content..." cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/resources/application.properties echo -e "\nChecking for any startup configuration files in the root directory..." fd -e sh -e bat . springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/Length of output: 1921
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the log4j2 configuration for Skywalking appenders and check for any agent configuration in the root project echo "Checking log4j2-spring.xml configuration..." cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/src/main/resources/log4j2-spring.xml echo -e "\nChecking for any agent configuration in the root project..." rg -l "skywalking-agent" springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/ echo -e "\nChecking for any README or documentation files that might contain setup instructions..." fd README -e md . springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/Length of output: 4951
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the README files for Skywalking setup instructions echo "Checking Skywalking README content..." cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/README.md echo -e "\nChecking for any Java agent configuration in startup scripts..." rg -l "javaagent.*skywalking" springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/ echo -e "\nChecking for any Skywalking Java agent dependencies..." rg "org.apache.skywalking.*agent" springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/ --type xmlLength of output: 1692
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz1-skywalking/pom.xml (1)
1-77: Verify module integration with base-skywalking.The configuration looks correct for a business module. Let's verify the presence and configuration of the base module to ensure proper integration.
✅ Verification successful
The previous output showed that the base module exists and versions are consistent (9.3.0) across modules, but we need to verify the complete configuration of the base module and parent pom to ensure proper integration.
Module integration with base-skywalking is properly configured
The verification confirms:
- Base module exists with correct Skywalking configuration (apm-toolkit-log4j-2.x v9.3.0)
- Consistent version usage (9.3.0) across all modules
- Proper dependency hierarchy with base module having required dependencies
- Correct parent-child relationship in module structure
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence and configuration of base-skywalking module # and consistency across related modules # Check if base module exists and has required dependencies echo "Checking base module configuration..." fd -t f "pom.xml" -p "springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking" --exec grep -l "spring-boot-starter-web\|apm-toolkit-log4j-2.x" # Verify consistent version usage across modules echo "Checking version consistency..." fd -t f "pom.xml" -p "springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking" --exec grep -A 1 "apm-toolkit-log4j-2.x"Length of output: 744
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify the complete configuration of base-skywalking module echo "Checking base-skywalking module dependencies..." cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/pom.xml # Also check parent pom for any skywalking related configurations echo -e "\nChecking parent pom configuration..." cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/pom.xmlLength of output: 5789
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/pom.xml (1)
1-77: Verify consistency with other sample modules.Please ensure this module follows the same structure and conventions as other sample modules in the project.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can verify that this module follows a consistent structure with other sample modules in the project. Let me highlight the key findings:
Module structure and dependencies are consistent with project standards
- The module follows the standard parent-child structure used across samples
- Dependencies are properly scoped with
providedwhere needed- Uses consistent version of Skywalking APM toolkit (9.3.0) across base and biz modules
- Follows the same plugin configuration pattern with sofa-ark-maven-plugin
- Maintains consistent logging configuration pattern with other modules
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check structure of other sample modules echo "Checking other sample module structures..." fd -t f "pom.xml" springboot-samples -x head -n 20 {} \; # Check for consistent dependency versions across samples echo "Checking dependency versions..." rg -A 5 "skywalking" springboot-samplesLength of output: 88664
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/base-skywalking/pom.xml (4)
1-15: LGTM: Project metadata is well-structuredThe project metadata is properly configured with correct parent POM reference and version alignment.
82-84: Complete the maven-jar-plugin configurationThe comment "Ensure other necessary configuration here" suggests incomplete configuration. Consider adding standard configurations like:
- manifest entries
- main class specification
- resource filtering
#!/bin/bash # Check for similar jar plugin configurations in other modules find . -name "pom.xml" -exec grep -A 10 "maven-jar-plugin" {} \;
16-67: Verify Skywalking agent compatibilityPlease verify that the selected Skywalking dependencies are compatible with the agent version that will be used in production.
#!/bin/bash # Search for Skywalking agent configuration in the project rg -l "skywalking.agent" . # Check for other Skywalking dependencies in other modules find . -name "pom.xml" -exec grep -A 5 "skywalking" {} \;
55-59: Verify disruptor version propertyThe
${disruptor.version}property is used but might not be defined in this POM or parent POM.✅ Verification successful
Let me search more specifically for the disruptor version property.
Property
disruptor.versionis properly definedThe
disruptor.versionproperty is defined with value3.4.2in multiple POM files, including the one containing this dependency. The property reference is valid and working as expected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if disruptor.version is defined in parent POMs find . -name "pom.xml" -exec grep -l "disruptor.version" {} \;Length of output: 3248
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for disruptor.version property in all pom.xml files find . -name "pom.xml" -exec grep -A 1 "<properties>" {} \; -exec grep "disruptor.version" {} \;Length of output: 3323
springboot-samples/pom.xml (1)
40-40: LGTM: New Skywalking module addition.The addition of the
tracing/skywalkingmodule is well-structured and follows the project's module organization pattern.springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/Formatter.xml (2)
83-83: LGTM: Indentation settings follow standard practices.The indentation settings are well-configured:
- Uses 4 spaces for indentation
- Uses spaces instead of tabs
- Consistent with common Java coding standards
Also applies to: 90-90, 139-139, 240-240
40-40: LGTM: Blank line settings enhance readability.The blank line settings are well-configured to improve code readability:
- Single blank line after package declaration
- Single blank line between import groups
- Single blank line between type declarations
- No blank lines before first class body declaration
Also applies to: 82-82, 198-198, 208-208
springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/biz2-skywalking/Formatter.xml (1)
76-76: Verify line wrapping and new line settings.The configuration includes potentially conflicting settings for line wrapping and new lines. Verify that these settings produce the desired formatting:
- Line split at 100 characters (line 76)
- No new line after array initializer opening brace (line 141)
- No new line at end of file (line 180)
These settings might lead to inconsistent formatting in edge cases.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Look for potential formatting inconsistencies # Search for array initializers and long lines that might be affected rg -l "{\s*$" --type java rg ".{100,}" --type javaAlso applies to: 141-141, 180-180
| </Console> | ||
| <RollingFile name="APP-DEFAULT-APPENDER" | ||
| fileName="${ctx:logging.file.path}/${ctx:spring.application.name}/app-default.log" | ||
| filePattern="${ctx:logging.file.path}/${ctx:spring.application.name}/app-default.log.%d{yyyy-MM-dd-HH}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding retention and size policies.
The current configuration:
- Uses hourly rolling with
filePattern="...log.%d{yyyy-MM-dd-HH}" - Has no maximum file size limit
- Lacks retention policy for old log files
This could lead to disk space issues in production.
Consider adding size and retention policies:
<TimeBasedTriggeringPolicy/>
- <DefaultRolloverStrategy/>
+ <DefaultRolloverStrategy max="168"> <!-- Keep 7 days of hourly files -->
+ <Delete basePath="${ctx:logging.file.path}/${ctx:spring.application.name}" maxDepth="1">
+ <IfFileName glob="app-default.log.*" />
+ <IfLastModified age="7d" />
+ </Delete>
+ </DefaultRolloverStrategy>Also applies to: 14-15
| <AsyncRoot level="INFO"> | ||
| <AppenderRef ref="Console"/> | ||
| <AppenderRef ref="APP-DEFAULT-APPENDER"/> | ||
| </AsyncRoot> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding shutdown hook for AsyncLogger.
Using AsyncRoot without proper shutdown handling might lead to lost logs during application shutdown.
Add the following system property to your application startup:
-Dlog4j2.contextSelector=org.apache.logging.log4j.core.async.AsyncLoggerContextSelectorAnd consider adding a shorter shutdown timeout in your configuration:
- <AsyncRoot level="INFO">
+ <AsyncRoot level="INFO" shutdownTimeout="10000">| private static Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Biz1Application.class); | ||
|
|
||
| public static void main(String[] args) { | ||
| SpringApplication.run(Biz1Application.class, args); | ||
|
|
||
| LOGGER.info("BaseApplication start!"); | ||
| LOGGER.info("Spring Boot Version: " | ||
| + SpringApplication.class.getPackage().getImplementationVersion()); | ||
| LOGGER.info("BaseApplication classLoader: " + Biz1Application.class.getClassLoader()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance logging implementation for better practices.
Consider the following improvements:
- Make the logger
finalas it's a static field - Use placeholders in logging statements instead of string concatenation
Apply these changes:
- private static Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Biz1Application.class);
+ private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Biz1Application.class);
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(Biz1Application.class, args);
LOGGER.info("BaseApplication start!");
- LOGGER.info("Spring Boot Version: "
- + SpringApplication.class.getPackage().getImplementationVersion());
- LOGGER.info("BaseApplication classLoader: " + Biz1Application.class.getClassLoader());
+ LOGGER.info("Spring Boot Version: {}",
+ SpringApplication.class.getPackage().getImplementationVersion());
+ LOGGER.info("BaseApplication classLoader: {}", Biz1Application.class.getClassLoader());📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| private static Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Biz1Application.class); | |
| public static void main(String[] args) { | |
| SpringApplication.run(Biz1Application.class, args); | |
| LOGGER.info("BaseApplication start!"); | |
| LOGGER.info("Spring Boot Version: " | |
| + SpringApplication.class.getPackage().getImplementationVersion()); | |
| LOGGER.info("BaseApplication classLoader: " + Biz1Application.class.getClassLoader()); | |
| private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Biz1Application.class); | |
| public static void main(String[] args) { | |
| SpringApplication.run(Biz1Application.class, args); | |
| LOGGER.info("BaseApplication start!"); | |
| LOGGER.info("Spring Boot Version: {}", | |
| SpringApplication.class.getPackage().getImplementationVersion()); | |
| LOGGER.info("BaseApplication classLoader: {}", Biz1Application.class.getClassLoader()); |
| public static void main(String[] args) { | ||
| SpringApplication.run(Biz2Application.class, args); | ||
|
|
||
| LOGGER.info("BaseApplication start!"); | ||
| LOGGER.info("Spring Boot Version: " | ||
| + SpringApplication.class.getPackage().getImplementationVersion()); | ||
| LOGGER.info("BaseApplication classLoader: " + Biz2Application.class.getClassLoader()); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve logging implementation.
Several suggestions for the logging implementation:
- The log message refers to "BaseApplication" but the class is named "Biz2Application"
- Consider logging version and classloader info before starting the application
- Use SLF4J placeholders instead of string concatenation for better performance
public static void main(String[] args) {
+ LOGGER.info("Spring Boot Version: {}",
+ SpringApplication.class.getPackage().getImplementationVersion());
+ LOGGER.info("Biz2Application classLoader: {}", Biz2Application.class.getClassLoader());
SpringApplication.run(Biz2Application.class, args);
-
- LOGGER.info("BaseApplication start!");
- LOGGER.info("Spring Boot Version: "
- + SpringApplication.class.getPackage().getImplementationVersion());
- LOGGER.info("BaseApplication classLoader: " + Biz2Application.class.getClassLoader());
+ LOGGER.info("Biz2Application started successfully!");
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public static void main(String[] args) { | |
| SpringApplication.run(Biz2Application.class, args); | |
| LOGGER.info("BaseApplication start!"); | |
| LOGGER.info("Spring Boot Version: " | |
| + SpringApplication.class.getPackage().getImplementationVersion()); | |
| LOGGER.info("BaseApplication classLoader: " + Biz2Application.class.getClassLoader()); | |
| } | |
| public static void main(String[] args) { | |
| LOGGER.info("Spring Boot Version: {}", | |
| SpringApplication.class.getPackage().getImplementationVersion()); | |
| LOGGER.info("Biz2Application classLoader: {}", Biz2Application.class.getClassLoader()); | |
| SpringApplication.run(Biz2Application.class, args); | |
| LOGGER.info("Biz2Application started successfully!"); | |
| } |
| @Override | ||
| public String service() { | ||
| String appName = applicationContext.getId(); | ||
|
|
||
| LOGGER.info("{} web test: into a service", appName); | ||
| return "A Sample Service"; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance service method with explicit tracing spans and error handling.
The current implementation lacks demonstration of tracing capabilities and proper error handling which are crucial for a tracing sample.
Consider enhancing the implementation to showcase tracing features:
@Override
public String service() {
- String appName = applicationContext.getId();
-
- LOGGER.info("{} web test: into a service", appName);
- return "A Sample Service";
+ Span span = null;
+ try {
+ // Start a new span
+ span = tracer.buildSpan("sample-service-operation")
+ .withTag("app.name", applicationContext.getId())
+ .start();
+
+ // Your business logic
+ String appName = applicationContext.getId();
+ LOGGER.info("{} web test: into a service", appName);
+
+ // Add more trace information
+ span.setTag("service.status", "success");
+ return "A Sample Service";
+ } catch (Exception e) {
+ if (span != null) {
+ span.setTag("error", true);
+ span.log(Map.of(
+ "event", "error",
+ "error.kind", e.getClass().getName(),
+ "message", e.getMessage()
+ ));
+ }
+ LOGGER.error("Service operation failed", e);
+ throw e;
+ } finally {
+ if (span != null) {
+ span.finish();
+ }
+ }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.source" value="1.7"/> | ||
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.insert_space_after_comma_in_enum_constant_arguments" value="insert"/> | ||
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.insert_space_after_opening_paren_in_constructor_declaration" value="do not insert"/> | ||
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.format_line_comments" value="false"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enable comment formatting for consistent documentation.
Comment formatting is currently disabled:
format_line_comments = falseclear_blank_lines_in_block_comment = falseformat_javadoc_comments = falseformat_header = falseformat_block_comments = false
This might lead to inconsistent documentation styles across the codebase. Consider enabling these settings to maintain uniform comment formatting.
Also applies to: 75-75, 196-196, 243-243, 244-244
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.blank_lines_before_new_chunk" value="1"/> | ||
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.insert_space_before_binary_operator" value="insert"/> | ||
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.blank_lines_before_package" value="0"/> | ||
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.source" value="1.7"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
The Java version configuration in the formatter file should be updated to match the project's Java 8 requirement.
The project's parent POM explicitly sets Java 8 as the target version:
<java.version>1.8</java.version>
<maven.compiler.source>8</maven.compiler.source>
<maven.compiler.target>8</maven.compiler.target>The formatter configuration should be aligned with the project's actual Java version to ensure consistent formatting rules.
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider upgrading Java version configuration.
The formatter is configured for Java 1.7, which is outdated. Consider updating to a more recent LTS version (8, 11, 17, or 21) to leverage modern language features and ensure better compatibility with current development practices.
Also applies to: 166-166, 239-239
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Java version used in the project
rg -l "sourceCompatibility|targetCompatibility|java.version" --type xml --type properties
Length of output: 126
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Java version in build files and properties
rg -l "sourceCompatibility|targetCompatibility|java.version" --type-add 'props:*.properties' --type props --type xml --type gradle --type maven
# Look for pom.xml files that might contain Java version
fd pom.xml
# Look for build.gradle files
fd build.gradle
# Check content of any found build files
find . -name "pom.xml" -o -name "build.gradle" -exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 8348
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Java version in the specific project's pom.xml
cat springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/pom.xml
# Check if there are any Java files in the project to verify actual Java usage
fd -e java . springboot-samples/tracing/skywalking/
# Look for any Spring Boot related version info in the parent poms
cat springboot-samples/pom.xml
Length of output: 13540
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.source" value="1.7"/> | ||
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.insert_space_after_comma_in_enum_constant_arguments" value="insert"/> | ||
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.insert_space_after_opening_paren_in_constructor_declaration" value="do not insert"/> | ||
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.format_line_comments" value="false"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enable comment formatting for better documentation consistency.
Most comment formatting settings are disabled, which could lead to inconsistent documentation styles across the codebase. Consider enabling these settings to maintain a uniform documentation style:
-<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.format_line_comments" value="false"/>
-<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.clear_blank_lines_in_block_comment" value="false"/>
-<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.format_javadoc_comments" value="false"/>
-<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.format_header" value="false"/>
-<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.format_block_comments" value="false"/>
+<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.format_line_comments" value="true"/>
+<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.clear_blank_lines_in_block_comment" value="true"/>
+<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.format_javadoc_comments" value="true"/>
+<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.format_header" value="true"/>
+<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.format_block_comments" value="true"/>Also applies to: 75-75, 196-196, 243-243, 244-244
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.insert_new_line_before_while_in_do_statement" value="do not insert"/> | ||
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.alignment_for_arguments_in_enum_constant" value="18"/> | ||
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.format_javadoc_comments" value="false"/> | ||
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.line_length" value="80"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider increasing line length limit.
The maximum line length is set to 80 characters, which is relatively restrictive for modern wide-screen displays. Consider increasing it to 100-120 characters for better readability while maintaining reasonable line lengths.
-<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.line_length" value="80"/>
+<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.line_length" value="120"/>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.line_length" value="80"/> | |
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.comment.line_length" value="120"/> |
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.blank_lines_before_new_chunk" value="1"/> | ||
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.insert_space_before_binary_operator" value="insert"/> | ||
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.blank_lines_before_package" value="0"/> | ||
| <setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.source" value="1.7"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Java 7 configuration is inconsistent with project requirements
The Eclipse formatter's Java 7 configuration is outdated and inconsistent with the project's actual Java requirements:
- SpringBoot 3 samples use Java 17
- SpringBoot 1 and regular SpringBoot samples use Java 8
- The codebase uses Java 8+ features like Optional, CompletableFuture, etc.
Recommend updating the formatter configuration to match the minimum Java version (Java 8) used across the project:
-<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.source" value="1.7"/>
+<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.source" value="1.8"/>🔗 Analysis chain
Consider upgrading Java version configuration.
The formatter is configured for Java 7, which reached end-of-life in 2015. Consider upgrading to a more recent Java version (e.g., Java 11 LTS or Java 17 LTS) to ensure compatibility with modern Java features and security updates.
-<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.source" value="1.7"/>
+<setting id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.source" value="11"/>Also applies to: 166-166, 239-239
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Java version used in the project
# Look for Java version declarations in build files
rg -l "sourceCompatibility|targetCompatibility|java.version" --type xml --type properties --type gradle
Length of output: 30566
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Java version configurations in build files and properties
rg -l "sourceCompatibility|targetCompatibility|java.version|compiler.source|compiler.target" --type gradle --type properties --type xml
Length of output: 172
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Spring Boot version and Java version requirements
fd pom.xml --exec grep -l "<java.version\|<spring-boot.version" {} \;
Length of output: 521
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for Java version in parent pom files
fd "parent.*.xml" --type f --exec grep -l "<java.version" {} \;
Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual Java version specified in the pom files
rg "<java.version>.*</java.version>" ./springboot3-samples/pom.xml ./springboot1-samples/pom.xml ./springboot-samples/pom.xml
Length of output: 338
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any Java source files in the project that use features beyond Java 7
rg "^.*(@FunctionalInterface|Stream|Optional|CompletableFuture|var\s+\w+\s*=)" --type java
Length of output: 3581
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Spring Boot version to understand minimum Java requirements
rg "<spring-boot.version>.*</spring-boot.version>" ./springboot3-samples/pom.xml ./springboot1-samples/pom.xml ./springboot-samples/pom.xml
Length of output: 141
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
dubbo32-samples/pom.xml (1)
Line range hint
21-21: Fix typo in property nameThere's a typo in the property name:
maven.gpg.pluignshould bemaven.gpg.plugin- <maven.gpg.pluign>1.6</maven.gpg.pluign> + <maven.gpg.plugin>1.6</maven.gpg.plugin>sofaboot4-samples/pom.xml (1)
24-25: Update related documentation if neededSince these version updates affect multiple dependencies in the dependency management section, ensure that any version-specific documentation or README files are updated accordingly.
Consider:
- Updating the project's README if it mentions specific versions
- Updating any deployment or development setup guides
- Adding a note about the version change in the project's changelog if maintained
sofaboot-samples/pom.xml (1)
24-25: Consider documenting version update rationale.While the version updates appear coordinated across projects, it would be helpful to document:
- The reason for these specific version updates
- Any notable changes or improvements they bring
Consider adding a comment in the PR description or updating the changelog to explain the motivation behind these version updates.
springboot1-samples/pom.xml (1)
Line range hint
12-12:⚠️ Security Advisory: Spring Boot 1.5.x is End of LifeSpring Boot 1.5.x reached end-of-life and is no longer receiving security updates. Consider upgrading to a supported version to ensure security compliance.
Recommended actions:
- Plan migration to a supported Spring Boot version (2.7.x LTS or 3.x)
- Review the Spring Boot migration guides
- Test thoroughly as this is a major version upgrade
Would you like assistance in creating a migration plan or opening a tracking issue for this upgrade?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
dubbo-samples/rpc/dubbo26/pom.xml(1 hunks)dubbo-samples/rpc/dubbo27/pom.xml(1 hunks)dubbo-samples/rpc/dubbo3/pom.xml(1 hunks)dubbo32-samples/pom.xml(1 hunks)feature-samples/pom.xml(1 hunks)sofaboot-samples/pom.xml(1 hunks)sofaboot4-samples/pom.xml(1 hunks)springboot-samples/pom.xml(1 hunks)springboot1-samples/pom.xml(1 hunks)springboot3-samples/pom.xml(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- dubbo-samples/rpc/dubbo26/pom.xml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- springboot-samples/pom.xml
🔇 Additional comments (8)
dubbo-samples/rpc/dubbo3/pom.xml (2)
Line range hint 82-111: LGTM: Dependency management is properly configured
The dependency management section correctly uses the updated versions and maintains consistent exclusions for logback dependencies. The configuration is well-structured and follows best practices.
30-31: Verify compatibility of version updates
The version updates for both koupleless.runtime.version (1.3.1 → 1.3.2) and sofa.ark.version (2.2.14 → 2.2.15) appear to be minor version increments. However, it would be helpful to:
- Document the rationale for these version updates
- Confirm there are no breaking changes in these versions
Let's verify the release information and compatibility:
✅ Verification successful
Version updates are safe and consistently applied across the project
Based on the verification results:
- The sofa-ark v2.2.15 release notes show only new features, improvements, and bug fixes without any breaking changes.
- The version updates are consistently applied across multiple modules:
- springboot-samples
- springboot1-samples
- feature-samples
- sofaboot-samples
- dubbo-samples (dubbo26, dubbo27, dubbo3)
The version updates appear to be safe, coordinated changes that maintain project-wide consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check release information for the updated versions
# Check for release notes/tags for koupleless runtime
echo "Checking koupleless runtime releases..."
gh api repos/koupleless/koupleless/releases | jq '.[] | select(.tag_name | contains("1.3.2")) | {tag_name, body}'
# Check for release notes/tags for sofa-ark
echo "Checking sofa-ark releases..."
gh api repos/sofastack/sofa-ark/releases | jq '.[] | select(.tag_name | contains("2.2.15")) | {tag_name, body}'
# Check for potential version conflicts in the project
echo "Checking for version references in other files..."
rg -g '*.xml' -g '*.properties' "1\.3\.[12]|2\.2\.1[45]"
Length of output: 4562
dubbo32-samples/pom.xml (2)
Line range hint 1-150: PR title/description mismatch with changes
The PR is titled "add skywalking samples" but the changes only show version updates. Consider either:
- Adding the missing skywalking sample implementation, or
- Updating the PR title/description to accurately reflect these version updates
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any skywalking-related changes that might be missing
# Search for any skywalking-related files or changes
echo "Searching for skywalking-related files..."
fd -t f -e xml -e java -e properties skywalking
# Search for skywalking dependencies or configurations
echo "Searching for skywalking references in configuration files..."
rg -l "skywalking"13-14: Verify version compatibility and stability
The version updates look reasonable, but let's verify their existence and stability.
sofaboot4-samples/pom.xml (1)
24-25: Verify compatibility of version updates
The version updates appear to be patch-level changes:
- koupleless.runtime.version: 2.1.6 -> 2.1.7
- sofa.ark.version: 3.1.7 -> 3.1.8
Let's verify the changes and compatibility:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a final response:
Version updates 2.1.7 and 3.1.8 are safe to proceed
The version changes are properly structured in the parent POM and consistently used across the project:
- The versions are centrally managed in sofaboot4-samples/pom.xml
- All modules reference these versions through property placeholders
- The changes are patch version updates that maintain compatibility:
- koupleless.runtime.version: 2.1.7
- sofa.ark.version: 3.1.8
- The dependencies are used consistently across:
- Base starter dependencies
- App starter dependencies
- Maven plugins
- Web ark plugin configurations
No incompatible configurations or version-specific features were found in the application properties or YAML files - they only contain standard logging and gateway configurations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for changelog entries and compatibility notes for the updated versions
# Check if there's a CHANGELOG.md in the repository
echo "Checking for CHANGELOG entries..."
rg -A 5 "2\.1\.7|3\.1\.8" CHANGELOG.md || echo "No CHANGELOG.md found"
# Look for any migration guides or breaking changes documentation
echo "Checking for migration guides..."
fd -g "*MIGRATION*.md" -g "*UPGRADING*.md" -g "*BREAKING-CHANGES*.md"
# Check for version-specific documentation
echo "Checking for version documentation..."
rg -g "*.md" "2\.1\.7|3\.1\.8"
Length of output: 658
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the pom.xml files to understand the dependency structure and any potential compatibility issues
# First, check the parent pom.xml for dependency declarations
echo "Checking parent pom.xml for dependencies..."
rg -A 10 "koupleless.runtime.version|sofa.ark.version" sofaboot4-samples/pom.xml
# Check all pom.xml files for usage of these dependencies
echo "Checking all pom.xml files for dependency usage..."
fd -e xml -x rg -l "koupleless-base-starter|koupleless-app-starter|sofa-ark-all|sofa-ark-springboot-starter|web-ark-plugin"
# Check for any README or documentation files in the project
echo "Checking for documentation..."
fd -e md -x cat {} \;
Length of output: 409477
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the codebase to understand the dependency structure and verify the concern
# First, check the parent pom.xml for version declarations
echo "Checking parent pom.xml for version declarations..."
rg -A 10 "koupleless.runtime.version|sofa.ark.version" sofaboot4-samples/pom.xml
# Check all pom.xml files for usage of these versions
echo "Checking all pom.xml files for version usage..."
fd -e xml -x rg -l "koupleless.runtime.version|sofa.ark.version"
# Check for any version-specific documentation
echo "Checking for version documentation..."
rg -g "*.md" "2\.1\.7|3\.1\.8"
Length of output: 8280
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the dependency usage and version references in more detail
# Check how these versions are used in dependency declarations
echo "Checking dependency declarations..."
rg -A 5 "<artifactId>(koupleless-base-starter|koupleless-app-starter|sofa-ark-all|sofa-ark-springboot-starter|web-ark-plugin)</artifactId>" sofaboot4-samples/pom.xml
# Check for any version-specific configurations or properties
echo "Checking version-specific configurations..."
rg -g "*.properties" -g "*.yml" "koupleless|sofa.ark"
# Look for any plugin configurations using these versions
echo "Checking plugin configurations..."
rg -A 10 "<artifactId>sofa-ark-maven-plugin</artifactId>" sofaboot4-samples/dynamic-stock/biz1/pom.xml
Length of output: 11042
springboot3-samples/pom.xml (2)
Line range hint 76-116: Dependencies are well-configured
The dependency configuration using these versions is well-structured:
- Proper exclusions to avoid logging conflicts
- Consistent use of version properties
- Clear organization in dependency management section
17-18: Verify version compatibility and latest releases
The version updates for sofa.ark.version (3.1.8) and koupleless.runtime.version (2.1.7) should be verified for:
- Compatibility with Spring Boot 3.2.6
- Compatibility with each other
- Whether these are the latest stable versions
✅ Verification successful
Version updates are consistent with project requirements
The version updates in springboot3-samples/pom.xml are verified to be appropriate:
-
sofa.ark.version (3.1.8):
- Matches the latest release on sofastack/sofa-ark (v3.1.8)
- Used consistently across Spring Boot 3.x projects (springboot3-samples, sofaboot4-samples, dubbo32-samples)
- Older projects correctly use v2.2.15 for compatibility
-
koupleless.runtime.version (2.1.7):
- Used consistently across Spring Boot 3.x projects
- Older projects correctly use v1.3.2 for compatibility
- While v1.3.1 shows as latest release, v2.1.7 appears to be from a different release branch specifically for Spring Boot 3.x compatibility
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version compatibility and latest releases
# Check if these versions are used consistently across all pom.xml files
echo "Checking version consistency across projects..."
find . -name "pom.xml" -type f -exec grep -H "sofa.ark.version" {} \;
find . -name "pom.xml" -type f -exec grep -H "koupleless.runtime.version" {} \;
# Check GitHub releases for latest versions
echo "Checking latest releases..."
gh api repos/sofastack/sofa-ark/releases/latest --jq '.tag_name'
gh api repos/koupleless/koupleless/releases/latest --jq '.tag_name'
Length of output: 23137
springboot1-samples/pom.xml (1)
17-18: LGTM on version updates.
The version updates look reasonable:
- koupleless.runtime.version: 1.3.2
- sofa.ark.version: 2.2.15
Let's verify the compatibility of these versions:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another verification strategy to check version compatibility and usage:
Let me generate the final response based on the verification results:
Version updates are compatible and safe to proceed
The version updates for koupleless.runtime.version (1.3.1 -> 1.3.2) and sofa.ark.version (2.2.14 -> 2.2.15) are minor version bumps that:
- Are being used successfully across multiple sample projects with different Spring Boot versions (1.5.x, 2.7.x, 3.2.x)
- Follow semantic versioning indicating backwards compatibility
- No compatibility issues found in GitHub issues
The Spring Boot 1.5.9 base application can safely use these updated versions as they maintain compatibility across the Spring Boot version spectrum.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if these are the latest stable versions and if they're compatible with Spring Boot 1.5.9
# Search for version compatibility information in documentation
fd -t f -e md -e txt . | xargs rg -i "compatibility|spring boot 1.5"
# Look for any known issues with these versions
gh api graphql -f query='
{
search(query: "repo:koupleless/samples is:issue koupleless.runtime.version:1.3.2 OR sofa.ark.version:2.2.15", type: ISSUE, first: 10) {
nodes {
... on Issue {
title
url
state
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 365
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for version references and usage patterns
# Look for any version constraints or compatibility notes in pom files
fd -e xml . | xargs rg -A 5 -B 5 "<koupleless.runtime.version>|<sofa.ark.version>"
# Check README files for any compatibility information
fd README.md | xargs cat
# Look for any Spring Boot version references to understand compatibility
fd -e xml . | xargs rg -A 2 "<spring-boot.version>|<spring.boot.version>"
Length of output: 239230
| <koupleless.runtime.version>1.3.2</koupleless.runtime.version> | ||
| <sofa.ark.version>2.2.15</sofa.ark.version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Version 1.3.2 of koupleless-runtime is not yet available
The version update to koupleless-runtime 1.3.2 cannot be verified as available:
- The version is not found in Maven Central repository
- No GitHub release tag exists for v1.3.2
- Although the version is referenced across multiple pom.xml files in the repository, using an unavailable version will cause build failures
Recommendations:
- Keep the current stable version until 1.3.2 is officially released
- Alternatively, verify if this version is available in a different artifact repository that's configured in the project
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the availability and stability of the updated versions
The version updates look reasonable as they are patch version increments, suggesting backward compatibility. Let's verify the availability and stability of these versions.
Let me verify the availability of these versions in other repositories since Maven Central shows koupleless 1.3.2 is not available.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the availability and stability of the updated versions
# Check if the versions exist in Maven Central
echo "Checking koupleless runtime version 1.3.2..."
curl -s "https://search.maven.org/solrsearch/select?q=g:com.alipay.sofa.koupleless+AND+a:koupleless-base-starter+AND+v:1.3.2" | jq '.response.numFound'
echo "Checking sofa ark version 2.2.15..."
curl -s "https://search.maven.org/solrsearch/select?q=g:com.alipay.sofa+AND+a:sofa-ark-all+AND+v:2.2.15" | jq '.response.numFound'
# Check for any known issues in GitHub
echo "Checking for recent issues related to these versions..."
gh api graphql -f query='
{
search(query: "repo:koupleless/koupleless is:issue label:bug 1.3.2", type: ISSUE, first: 5) {
nodes {
... on Issue {
title
state
createdAt
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 846
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the versions are available in other repositories
echo "Checking for koupleless 1.3.2 in GitHub packages..."
curl -s "https://api.github.com/repos/koupleless/koupleless/releases/tags/v1.3.2"
echo -e "\nChecking for references to version 1.3.2 in the repository..."
rg "1\.3\.2" --type xml
echo -e "\nChecking for any release notes or changelog entries..."
fd -g "CHANGELOG*" -X cat
Length of output: 1569
| <koupleless.runtime.version>1.3.2</koupleless.runtime.version> | ||
| <sofa.ark.version>2.2.15</sofa.ark.version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Version inconsistency detected across different sample modules
The version verification reveals inconsistencies:
-
SpringBoot3 samples use:
- koupleless.runtime.version: 2.1.7
- sofa.ark.version: 3.1.8
-
SpringBoot/SpringBoot1/Feature samples use:
- koupleless.runtime.version: 1.3.2
- sofa.ark.version: 2.2.15
This version mismatch between different sample modules could lead to compatibility issues. The versions should be aligned unless there's a specific reason for the difference.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify version compatibility and changelog
The version updates look consistent with other pom.xml files in the PR:
- koupleless.runtime.version: 1.3.2
- sofa.ark.version: 2.2.15
Let's verify these versions:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if these are the latest stable versions and if there are any breaking changes
# Search for version declarations across all pom files to ensure consistency
echo "Checking version consistency across pom files..."
rg -g "pom.xml" "koupleless\.runtime\.version|sofa\.ark\.version"
# Check if these versions exist in the respective repositories
echo "Checking koupleless releases..."
gh api repos/koupleless/koupleless/releases --jq '.[].tag_name'
echo "Checking sofa-ark releases..."
gh api repos/sofastack/sofa-ark/releases --jq '.[].tag_name'
Length of output: 23055
| <koupleless.runtime.version>1.3.2</koupleless.runtime.version> | ||
| <sofa.ark.version>2.2.15</sofa.ark.version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Version update needs revision - koupleless 1.3.2 appears to be premature
The version update to koupleless 1.3.2 appears problematic:
- Latest released version is 1.3.1 (from September 2024)
- Version 1.3.2 is being used across multiple sample projects but hasn't been officially released
- The sofa-ark update to 2.2.15 is correct and matches the latest release
Recommend:
- Revert koupleless version to 1.3.1 until 1.3.2 is officially released
- Keep sofa-ark version at 2.2.15
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the version updates and their implications.
The version updates look consistent with the coordinated dependency management across projects. However, let's verify:
- That these are the latest stable versions
- Any breaking changes or known issues
Version updates need attention - koupleless version appears outdated
Based on the GitHub releases data:
- The koupleless version being updated to (1.3.2) is not yet released - latest is v1.3.1 from September 2024
- The sofa-ark version update to 2.2.15 matches the latest release in that series from November 2024
Let's verify if there are any references to version 1.3.2 in the repository:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify latest versions and changelogs for koupleless and sofa-ark
# Check for koupleless releases
echo "Checking koupleless releases..."
gh api repos/koupleless/koupleless/releases --jq '.[0:3] | .[] | {tag_name, published_at}'
# Check for sofa-ark releases
echo "Checking sofa-ark releases..."
gh api repos/sofastack/sofa-ark/releases --jq '.[0:3] | .[] | {tag_name, published_at}'
# Look for any migration guides or breaking changes in recent commits
echo "Checking for breaking changes..."
gh api repos/koupleless/koupleless/commits --jq '.[] | select(.commit.message | contains("BREAKING") or contains("breaking")) | {sha, commit: {message}}'
gh api repos/sofastack/sofa-ark/commits --jq '.[] | select(.commit.message | contains("BREAKING") or contains("breaking")) | {sha, commit: {message}}'
Length of output: 1069
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to koupleless version 1.3.2
echo "Searching for koupleless version 1.3.2 references..."
rg "1\.3\.2" -A 2 -B 2
# Check if this is a development branch version
echo "Checking development branches..."
git branch -a | grep dev
Length of output: 4297
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
koupleless.runtime.versionupdated to1.3.2or2.1.7.sofa.ark.versionupdated to2.2.15or3.1.8.Bug Fixes
maven.gpg.pluginproperty in relevant projects.