Skip to content

Modify kvm-qemu.sh to apply changes in #1634 back #2606

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MHM98
Copy link
Contributor

@MHM98 MHM98 commented May 25, 2025

Modify kvm installer to address issue #2588

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @MHM98, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

Hello! Gemini here, providing a summary of this pull request to help everyone get up to speed quickly.

This pull request aims to address issue #2588 by modifying the kvm-qemu.sh installer script. Based on the title, it appears to be applying changes related to PR #1634 back into the script. Specifically, the change involves adjusting the list of files processed by the replace_seabios_clues_public function.

Highlights

  • Modifies KVM Installer Script: Changes are made to the installer/kvm-qemu.sh script, which is part of the KVM installation process.
  • Adjusts String Replacement Logic: A specific file, src/fw/paravirt.c, is commented out from the list of files where the script replaces 'QEMU' strings within the replace_seabios_clues_public function.

Changelog

  • installer/kvm-qemu.sh
    • Commented out src/fw/paravirt.c from the FILES array in the replace_seabios_clues_public function (line 781). This excludes this file from the string replacement process.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


A script needs a fix,
Comment out one file path,
Issue now resolved.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request modifies the kvm-qemu.sh installer script by commenting out src/fw/paravirt.c from a list of files processed by a sed command. The stated purpose is to address issue #2588 and revert a change from #1634.

The change itself is straightforward, but adding a small inline comment would significantly improve maintainability by providing context directly in the code for future reference.

Summary of Findings

  • Maintainability: Missing inline comment for change: The script installer/kvm-qemu.sh was modified to exclude src/fw/paravirt.c from a string replacement operation. An inline comment explaining the reason for this exclusion (referencing issue KVM vm does not see more than 2GB of memory. #2588) would improve code clarity and maintainability.

Merge Readiness

The pull request makes a targeted change to address a specific issue. However, to enhance the maintainability and clarity of the codebase, I recommend adding an inline comment as suggested. Once this minor change is incorporated, the PR should be in good shape for further review and merging. As a reviewer, I am not authorized to approve pull requests.

@@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ function replace_seabios_clues_public() {

FILES=(
src/hw/blockcmd.c
src/fw/paravirt.c
#src/fw/paravirt.c
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This change comments out src/fw/paravirt.c, preventing the replacement of "QEMU" strings within it. While the PR description and title reference issues #2588 and #1634, it would be beneficial for long-term maintainability to include a brief inline comment here.

Could you add a comment explaining why this specific file is excluded from the string replacement? This would help future developers understand the reasoning without needing to track down external issue trackers or PRs, especially concerning its impact on VM detection capabilities.

Suggested change
#src/fw/paravirt.c
#src/fw/paravirt.c # Excluded to address issue #2588 (and revert part of #1634)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant