Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(http-add-on): Operator server uses the correct metrics port #559

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

JorTurFer
Copy link
Member

Checklist

  • Commits are signed with Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO - learn more)

Related to kedacore/http-add-on#812 (comment)

Signed-off-by: Jorge Turrado Ferrero <Jorge_turrado@hotmail.es>
@JorTurFer JorTurFer requested a review from a team as a code owner November 6, 2023 07:49
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ spec:
ports:
- name: https
port: {{ default 8443 .Values.operator.port }}
targetPort: https
targetPort: metrics
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Care to elaborate on this?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, there isn't any port named https in the operator:

ports:
- name: metrics
containerPort: 8080
- name: probes
containerPort: 8081

And there is one occurrence where .Value.operator.port is used:
https://github.com/kedacore/charts/blob/main/http-add-on/templates/operator/deployment.yaml#L26

That's why I supposed that the target port is the metrics port

eumel8 added a commit to eumel8/kedacharts that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
cherry picked kedacore#559

Signed-off-by: Frank Kloeker <f.kloeker@telekom.de>
@JorTurFer
Copy link
Member Author

Kindly reminder: PTAL @tomkerkhove xD

@JorTurFer JorTurFer closed this Jan 21, 2024
@JorTurFer JorTurFer deleted the JorTurFer-patch-1 branch January 21, 2024 16:05
@JorTurFer
Copy link
Member Author

I've included this PR on this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants