-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 939
fix(cookbooks): Fix regressed issues in cookbooks #1324
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
dev->main
dev->main
dev->main
dev -> main (March 18, 2025)
dev->main
dev -> main
dev -> main (hotfix)
Signed-off-by: Diwank Singh Tomer <diwank.singh@gmail.com>
dev -> main (Mar 29)
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
CI Feedback 🧐A test triggered by this PR failed. Here is an AI-generated analysis of the failure:
|
PR Code Suggestions ✨Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to 6478b12 in 1 minute and 49 seconds
More details
- Looked at
55
lines of code in1
files - Skipped
4
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. integrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/spider.py:52
- Draft comment:
Ensure commented-out parameters are intentional. If removal is permanent, remove dead code. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
Commented-out code is generally considered a code smell and should be removed if it's no longer needed. However, this could be temporary debugging or testing code. The comment doesn't provide strong guidance - it just asks to "ensure" the comments are intentional. Per the rules, we should not ask authors to "ensure" or "verify" things.
The comment could be more actionable by directly stating "Remove commented out code if no longer needed" instead of asking for verification. Also, this could be temporary debugging code that the author intends to uncomment later.
While commented-out code is a valid concern, the way this comment is phrased violates our rules about not asking authors to verify or ensure things. A more direct "remove if not needed" would be better.
The comment should be deleted because it asks the author to "ensure" something rather than making a clear, actionable request. If commented code is an issue, it should be raised differently.
2. integrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/spider.py:45
- Draft comment:
Avoid logging sensitive API key information; consider removing or masking the API key in logs. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
3. integrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/spider.py:52
- Draft comment:
Remove or document the commented-out parameters to clarify why they are disabled. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
<= threshold50%
None
Workflow ID: wflow_OWtzmGMCmrbiehHj
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev
in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 29c7eeb in 1 minute and 34 seconds
More details
- Looked at
52
lines of code in1
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
7
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. integrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/spider.py:48
- Draft comment:
If multiple pages are returned, overwriting 'results' may drop earlier entries. Consider accumulating them (e.g. appending to a list) if intended. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
2. integrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/spider.py:56
- Draft comment:
Consider chaining the caught exception (using 'raise RuntimeError(msg) from e') to preserve traceback for better debugging. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
3. integrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/spider.py:33
- Draft comment:
Ensure the DEMO_API_KEY check and fallback to environment variable is thoroughly documented to avoid confusion in API key handling. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%
<= threshold50%
None
4. integrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/spider.py:33
- Draft comment:
Using the walrus operator here to check for 'DEMO_API_KEY' is concise, but consider extracting 'DEMO_API_KEY' into a named constant. This improves readability and maintainability. Also, ensure that the environment-provided 'spider_api_key' is non-empty to avoid misconfigurations. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
5. integrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/spider.py:57
- Draft comment:
When handling exceptions here, consider using exception chaining (e.g. 'raise RuntimeError(msg) from e') so that the original traceback isn’t lost. This can aid in debugging. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
6. integrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/spider.py:42
- Draft comment:
The async loop assigns each yielded result to the same 'results' variable, overwriting previous values. Confirm that only a single (or final) result is intended. If multiple results are expected, consider accumulating them in a list. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
7. integrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/spider.py:6
- Draft comment:
Importing 'spider_api_key' from the environment enhances security. Just ensure that the environment variable is reliably set in all deployment contexts to avoid fallback issues. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
<= threshold50%
None
Workflow ID: wflow_QdulbUZbTh9GQdGU
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
PR Type
Enhancement, Bug fix, Documentation
Description
Enhanced security by replacing hardcoded API keys with environment variables.
Improved logging and error handling in
spider.py
for better debugging.Updated JSON transformation examples and clarified instructions in cookbooks.
Refined sarcastic headline generation logic and outputs in cookbooks.
Changes walkthrough 📝
05-video-processing-with-natural-language.ipynb
Security and example improvements in video processing notebook
cookbooks/05-video-processing-with-natural-language.ipynb
02-sarcastic-news-headline-generator.ipynb
Security and logic updates in sarcastic headline generator
cookbooks/02-sarcastic-news-headline-generator.ipynb
spider.py
Enhanced logging and error handling in spider utility
integrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/spider.py
Important
Enhance security, logging, and logic in cookbooks and
spider.py
by replacing hardcoded API keys, improving error handling, and refining examples.05-video-processing-with-natural-language.ipynb
and02-sarcastic-news-headline-generator.ipynb
.spider.py
for better debugging and traceability.05-video-processing-with-natural-language.ipynb
.02-sarcastic-news-headline-generator.ipynb
.This description was created by
for 29c7eeb. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.