dev -> main (hotfix)

[Ahmad-mtos]

PR Type

Bug fix

---

Description

• Fixed the get_executions query to include ordering by updated_at.

• Added a limit of 1 to the query results.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Bug fix	get_execution.py Adjusted query for ordering and limiting results                  agents-api/agents_api/queries/executions/get_execution.py Added ORDER BY updated_at DESC to the query. Added LIMIT 1 to restrict results to a single record. +3/-1

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

---

Important

Add ORDER BY updated_at DESC LIMIT 1 to SQL query in get_execution.py to ensure retrieval of the most recent execution.

• Behavior:
  • Modify SQL query in get_execution.py to include ORDER BY updated_at DESC LIMIT 1.
  • Ensures retrieval of the most recent execution when multiple entries exist for the same execution_id.

^{This description was created by for 2dde6c6. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[qodo-merge-for-open-source]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Query Logic Change The PR adds ordering by updated_at DESC and limits results to 1 record. Verify this matches the intended behavior of the get_execution function, which likely expects a single result for a specific execution_id. execution_id = $1 ORDER BY updated_at DESC LIMIT 1;

[qodo-merge-for-open-source]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	Remove redundant sorting and limiting The query is selecting from a table called latest_executions which likely already contains the most recent execution records. Adding ORDER BY updated_at DESC LIMIT 1 might be redundant and could potentially return incorrect results if the table design assumes uniqueness by execution_id. agents-api/agents_api/queries/executions/get_execution.py [33-36] WHERE - execution_id = $1 -ORDER BY updated_at DESC -LIMIT 1; + execution_id = $1; Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that if the table 'latest_executions' is designed to contain only the most recent execution records, then the ORDER BY and LIMIT clauses may be redundant and could potentially affect query performance. The table name strongly suggests this is the case.	Medium
More

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 2dde6c6 in 1 minute and 11 seconds

More details

• Looked at 15 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. agents-api/agents_api/queries/executions/get_execution.py:34

• Draft comment:
  Ordering change: Adding ORDER BY updated_at DESC and LIMIT 1 ensures the latest entry is returned. Confirm that updated_at is indexed for optimal performance.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
  The query is already filtering by execution_id which should be unique. The table name 'latest_executions' suggests it's a view specifically designed to get latest records. Adding ORDER BY and LIMIT seems redundant if execution_id is unique. The indexing suggestion isn't clearly necessary since we're doing a primary key lookup. The comment also asks for confirmation, which violates our rules.
  I might be wrong about execution_id being unique. Also, I don't have access to the view definition to confirm my assumptions about latest_executions.
  Even with those uncertainties, the comment asks for confirmation which violates our rules. Additionally, indexing suggestions without clear evidence of performance issues are speculative.
  Delete the comment because it asks for confirmation (violating our rules) and makes speculative performance suggestions without evidence of an actual problem.

2. agents-api/agents_api/queries/executions/get_execution.py:35

• Draft comment:
  Ordering by updated_at DESC with LIMIT 1 ensures the most recent record is returned. Confirm that execution_id may have multiple entries in the view and consider a tie-breaker if duplicate timestamps occur.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

3. agents-api/agents_api/queries/executions/get_execution.py:36

• Draft comment:
  Ensure the updated_at column is indexed in the underlying view to maintain query performance with the new ORDER BY clause.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

Workflow ID: wflow_wtQKZUe0z41lq8XC

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.